[gui-talk] write letters to California

[Mike Freeman]

Dave:

You may well be right that fully-automatic cars will be introduced before
blind-drivable cars are introduced. But, as you say, howling may be
premature.

Mike


-----Original Message-----
From: gui-talk-bounces at nfbnet.org [mailto:gui-talk-bounces at nfbnet.org] On
Behalf Of David Andrews
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2012 3:57 PM
To: Discussion of the Graphical User Interface, GUI Talk Mailing List
Subject: Re: [gui-talk] write letters to California

I partially agree with Mike.  I think it would be premature to 
protest it at this point.  The driverless cars need further 
development and a "track record" no pun intended.  Later on we can go after
it.

I also think we will see driverless cars before we see blind-drivable 
cars -- just my opinion.

Dave

At 05:29 PM 5/31/2012, you wrote:
>I think the requirement is perfectly reasonable at this time and it 
>would be absolutely stupid to protest this. In fact, it could hurt 
>us. What we want is to be able to drive, not a self-driving vehicle.
>
>Mike Freeman
>sent from my iPhone
>
>
>On May 31, 2012, at 13:41, "Hoffman, Allen" <Allen.Hoffman at HQ.DHS.GOV>
wrote:
>
> > 
>
http://www.latimes.com/business/money/la-fi-mo-google-car-protest-20120530,0
,6380083.story
> >
> > In the California bill to allow self driving cars, it requires a 
> legal driver behind the wheel in case somehting goes wrong.  so 
> much for a solution for blind folks.
> > Read this article and send in letters to get this changed!
> >
> > Allen Hoffman


_______________________________________________
gui-talk mailing list
gui-talk at nfbnet.org
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gui-talk_nfbnet.org
To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
gui-talk:
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/gui-talk_nfbnet.org/k7uij%40panix.com