[gui-talk] write letters to California

[Steve Deeley]

Now that's what the general public wants to see is a blind person driving a car? Steve

Sent from Steve Deeley's iPhone 


On May 31, 2012, at 6:57 PM, David Andrews <dandrews at visi.com> wrote:

> I partially agree with Mike.  I think it would be premature to protest it at this point.  The driverless cars need further development and a "track record" no pun intended.  Later on we can go after it.
> 
> I also think we will see driverless cars before we see blind-drivable cars -- just my opinion.
> 
> Dave
> 
> At 05:29 PM 5/31/2012, you wrote:
>> I think the requirement is perfectly reasonable at this time and it would be absolutely stupid to protest this. In fact, it could hurt us. What we want is to be able to drive, not a self-driving vehicle.
>> 
>> Mike Freeman
>> sent from my iPhone
>> 
>> 
>> On May 31, 2012, at 13:41, "Hoffman, Allen" <Allen.Hoffman at HQ.DHS.GOV> wrote:
>> 
>> > http://www.latimes.com/business/money/la-fi-mo-google-car-protest-20120530,0,6380083.story
>> >
>> > In the California bill to allow self driving cars, it requires a legal driver behind the wheel in case somehting goes wrong.  so much for a solution for blind folks.
>> > Read this article and send in letters to get this changed!
>> >
>> > Allen Hoffman
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> gui-talk mailing list
> gui-talk at nfbnet.org
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gui-talk_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for gui-talk:
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/gui-talk_nfbnet.org/stevep.deeley%40insightbb.com