[gui-talk] [gua-talk] Google Search Settings Page No Longer Accessible

[Mike Freeman]

Ray:

The appearance of the page can depend on the cookie contents. I have a system where radio buttons astill appear. 

Mike Freeman


On Dec 20, 2011, at 15:38, Ray Foret Jr <rforetjr at att.net> wrote:

> We do know what we're talking about!  We're talking about the Google search settings page.  Perhaps you should read more carefully before you criticize.
> 
> 
> Sincerely,
> The Constantly Barefooted Ray!!!
> 
> Now a very proud and happy Mac user!!!
> 
> Skype name:
> barefootedray
> 
> Facebook:
> facebook.com/ray.foretjr.1
> 
> 
> 
> On Dec 20, 2011, at 3:57 PM, Frendly_Nadia wrote:
> 
>> Hey,
>> 
>> Besides you all lost me I have not noticed a huge change in google's
>> website besides the edit boxs when you use the website for surching.
>> 
>> I do not mind that people say or claim that things are not accessible
>> but, please please make sure you ask people before you say things on
>> this NFB mailing list. There is however a new layout to google that
>> they are or have already rolled out. graphicly its much bigger and
>> white on red buttens Some screen reader users will see the change with
>> screen readers. Another heads up is that youtube is getting a new GUI
>> .  So my advice is to start playing around with google. It has a lot
>> of good things need to get use to the new GUI as with new things comes
>> new user interfaces. Quick fact windows 8 is out for eaither develper
>> or beta release. Have some new technology and some things that people
>> at FS are going to have to overcome. Maybe they have already I do not
>> know, but I do know that JAWS 13 is out at this time. I know for sure
>> it is going to be a least a little change from windows 7. I tested the
>> windows 8 but, was not impressed with it. That is just my thought on
>> it make sure you ask around thoughts do vary on it quite a bit. Wish
>> you luck on your widows learning along with Google.
>> On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 6:44 PM, Rose Combs <rosecombs at q.com> wrote: