[gui-talk] Ray Kurzweil Teams with Baker & Taylor on NeweReaderSoftware

Steve Jacobson steve.jacobson at visi.com
Sat Oct 24 22:12:33 UTC 2009


James,

Thanks for this explanation, and it is a little clearer to me.  Let us 
know what happens.

Best regards,

Steve Jacobson

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "James Pepper" <b75205 at gmail.com>
To: "NFBnet GUI Talk Mailing List" <gui-talk at nfbnet.org>
Sent: Saturday, October 24, 2009 2:13 AM
Subject: Re: [gui-talk] Ray Kurzweil Teams with Baker & Taylor on 
NeweReaderSoftware


> Steve:
>
> The fact remains that the majority of publishers, around 90% of them 
> put
> their content into a PDF format to send to professional printers and 
> it is
> from that compilation that they make their "accessible versions." 
> Once the
> PDF file is made, usually after they make the index, the content is 
> reviewed
> and it is sent to the printer.
>
> Existing software does not provide 100% accessibility, there are 
> always
> problems and they take a lot of time to edit these documents.   And 
> your
> publishers are not going to be happy delaying a book release to lay 
> out the
> accessibility after the fact, especially when they know that they will 
> not
> make a dime on the book because of the free accessibility laws and 
> they know
> that accessibility is right now a no win situation.  You are damned if 
> you
> do, and damned if you don't.  But if they could use the same document 
> they
> use to print the file, make it accessible using my process, then they 
> can
> sell the document themselves and control the copyrights.
>
> My procedure can be integrated in many different programs resulting in
> accessible content created as it is made.  I chose Office as an 
> illustration
> because if we can get Microsoft on board with this it will affect the 
> whole
> world. For instance my process would add about 2 billion more 
> potential
> customers to Adobe.  It is not just for the blind it is for all those 
> who
> can use their products worldwide.  I think that would be a great 
> incentive
> to stand up and take notice of the new format.
>
> Also the current crop of ebooks are not necessarily accessible even 
> though
> they claim accessibility.  Accessible to JAWS does not help the people 
> who
> do not own JAWS.  But making it accessible to any text to speech 
> engine
> would make accessibility universal even if they use different formats. 
> The
> functionality is the key, not who makes the software.  Anyone could 
> download
> a free text to speech engine and solve their problems.
>
> The Social Security Administration has been ordered to become 
> accessible to
> the blind.  I can achieve this with my system right now, it will take 
> time
> to make the documents because the list is extensive! But it can be 
> done.  I
> can do this very rapidly and accurately and in many langauges. The 
> level of
> accessibility will be the entire document accessible using free screen
> readers so that Social Security will be for all of the people not just 
> those
> who are fortunate to own a professional grade screen reader.
>
> James Pepper
> _______________________________________________
> gui-talk mailing list
> gui-talk at nfbnet.org
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gui-talk_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for 
> gui-talk:
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/gui-talk_nfbnet.org/steve.jacobson%40visi.com
> 





More information about the GUI-Talk mailing list