[Reader-users] Determining The Correct Tilt: Was RE:my mom'sletter
Gary Wunder
gwunder at earthlink.net
Mon Nov 5 12:38:25 CST 2007
$150 from the NFB'S Independence Market - 410.659.9314.
Gary
----- Original Message -----
From: "Chris Meredith" <cmered at microsoft.com>
To: "Kurzweil National Federation of the Blind Reader user list"
<reader-users at nfbnet.org>
Sent: Monday, November 05, 2007 12:33 PM
Subject: Re: [Reader-users] Determining The Correct Tilt: Was RE:my
mom'sletter
>I didn't know there was such an animal as a stand for this device. Where
>might I find it, and how much might it set me back?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: reader-users-bounces at nfbnet.org
> [mailto:reader-users-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of Pam Drake
> Sent: Saturday, November 03, 2007 6:14 PM
> To: 'Kurzweil National Federation of the Blind Reader user list'
> Subject: Re: [Reader-users] Determining The Correct Tilt: Was RE: my
> mom'sletter
>
> Mike,
>
> Thanks for the very detailed instructions. Without a sighted person
> easily
> available to verify my camera position it really helps to have the extra
> verbal input, especially for one who refers to the word "straight" as the
> eight-letter S-word". Sorry if that offended anybody, but that concept
> just
> is very hard for me. So is centering, but you have given me a reference
> to
> work on.
>
>
>
> Oh yes, the parts of the machine are very easy to identify. I even had
> the
> two pieces come apart the day I first tried the ill-fated battery change;
> so
> I know how important it is to make sure the camera and PDA are snugly
> attached and the Velcro securely fastened.
>
> So I gather from your information that my definition of "tilt" isn't
> accurate. That's good to know. I tend to take things very literally at
> times, and that can of course cause mistakes.
>
> Thanks again.
>
> Pam
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: reader-users-bounces at nfbnet.org
> [mailto:reader-users-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of Mike Freeman
> Sent: Saturday, November 03, 2007 7:41 AM
> To: Kurzweil National Federation of the Blind Reader user list
> Subject: Re: [Reader-users] Determining The Correct Tilt: Was RE: my mom's
> letter
>
> Pam:
>
> You're making this harder than it need be.
>
> First, as elementary as it sounds, please be aware that the camera is the
> oblongish projection from the PDA. The camera lens is the
> glass/plastic/feeling disk that you feel through the opening in the part
> of
> the case that holds the camera. Hence, when you "point the camera" at
> something, you are aiming this disk -- the lens -- at it.
>
> Second, you want the camera placed such that the center of the lens is
> pointing straight down toward the reading material and such that it is
> centered on the material (such as a piece of paper or page from a book),
> i.e., the edges of the paper are equidistant in the horizontal plane from
> the center of the lens. You can learn to find this point by putting the
> Reader on the surface and sliding it till there is an equal amount of
> paper
> to the left, right, top and bottom from the lens. Now bring the camera up
> *flat* till it is 16/18 inches above the reading surface. In the Field of
> View Report, what you want to hear is "All Four Edges Visible". Don't
> worry
> about how much the camera is rotated with respect to the page; while this
> is
> useful in that the closer the camera is aligned to the page (either 0
> degrees or 90 degrees off -- the software will adjust for the rotation and
> will say the picture is "upside down"
> if the camera is rotated 180 degrees with respect to the page), the better
> the image, the difference is slight and isn't nearly as critical as
> whether
> you have all four edges of the paper visible or not. The software will
> compensate for the rotation. You also want the printed image to take up
> somewhere around 50% of the total area seen by the camera; if the camera
> is
> too far away from the reading surface, the image may not be sufficiently
> distinct to get good recognition; if the camera is too close, it won't
> see
> the entire surface. I've taken images with as little as 20% of the camera
> image consisting of print but this is not ideal.
>
> Third, if you can't quite get all four edges visible, take the picture
> anyway; you may be surprised. However, you won't be guaranteed that the
> Reader will see all the print that is there.
>
> All this takes far longer to talk about then to do. Don't obsess over it;
> just practice, practice, practice. And then practice some more.
> You'll get the hang of it. If you truly don't have the hand coordination
> or
> steadiness to master the thing; the Reader stand works wonderfully. I
> bought
> the Reader before there *was* a stand so if I wanted to use it, I perforce
> had to get at least decent at positioning it over the printed material.
> There are many who are better at it than am I; however, I'm "good enough
> for
> government work" -- which is where I work. (grin)
>
> I will say this; after you get good with the Reader, you'll have a much
> better understanding of what it is like to look directly at something as
> opposed to viewing at an angle.
>
> Never fear; I'm quite certain you'll get it. But, as I say, less
> obsessing,
> more practicing. (huge grin)
>
> Warmly,
>
> Mike Freeman
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Pam Drake
> To: 'Kurzweil National Federation of the Blind Reader user list'
> Sent: Saturday, November 03, 2007 1:00 AM
> Subject: [Reader-users] Determining The Correct Tilt: Was RE: my mom's
> letter
>
>
> I am trying to determine how to recognize and perfect the tilt. I'm
> imagining it as a kind of downward slant, placing the camera at the
> proper
> height, but closer to the paper than the pda. Is this assumption
> correct?
> Can anyone possibly describe what position I'm trying to find? Is it a
> steep angle? Shannon first told me of this privately in a phone
> conversation, and I think I have the idea, but wanted to run my idea by
> the
> list to get any further clarification from anyone. My spatial judgment
> is
> somewhat off, so the more possible illustrations I can get of this idea,
> the
> better.
>
> Thanks, as always.
>
> Pam
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: reader-users-bounces at nfbnet.org
> [mailto:reader-users-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of Shannon!
> Sent: Sunday, October 28, 2007 1:52 PM
> To: Kurzweil National Federation of the Blind Reader user list
> Subject: [Reader-users] my mom's letter
>
> Hi James,
> I most definitely shall keep the letter, not only to show what the reader
> can do, but also to help me learn to be a better picture taker. I was
> getting 2 and a half thirds of the letter, but no matter what I did, I
> could
> not get it all. So when my husband came home, I turned the view finder
> on
> so he could see and we practiced the tilt of the camera. IN my case, I
> was
> holding it high enough, but my tilt was wrong. This is probably the
> hardest, (though not really hard), thing about the Reader, is getting
> that
> camera tilt right, especially if you absolutely must, or want to, read
> the
> full page.
> I've got the letter saved on my cf card and the original print letter,
> just
> in case I need to practice the tilt some more.
> Shannon
> Don't question the gifts you have been given; just do what you can to
> pass
> the gifts along.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Reader-users mailing list
> Reader-users at nfbnet.org
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/reader-users
> _______________________________________________
> Reader-users mailing list
> Reader-users at nfbnet.org
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/reader-users
More information about the Reader-users
mailing list