[Reader-users] My Impressions After Hands-On

[James Gashel]

You should expect this in a few days.  

thanks, James Gashel

sent from my wireless dash

-----Original Message-----
From: "Cindy Handel" <cindy425 at verizon.net>
To: "Kurzweil National Federation of the Blind Reader user list" <reader-users at nfbnet.org>
Sent: 6/27/2007 8:20 AM
Subject: Re: [Reader-users] My Impressions After Hands-On

When will the upgrade be available online?

Cindy
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "James Gashel" <jim at knfbreader.com>
To: "'Kurzweil National Federation of the Blind Reader user list'" 
<reader-users at nfbnet.org>
Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2007 11:13 PM
Subject: Re: [Reader-users] My Impressions After Hands-On


Hi Evelyn

That is my intention.  Please bring your SD card so we can trade it for the
upgrade.  We will perform the upgrade procedure at the NFB reader sales and
demonstration area in the exhibit hall, beginning Sunday, July 1.

Thanks, J. G.


-----Original Message-----
From: reader-users-bounces at nfbnet.org
[mailto:reader-users-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of Evelyn Weckerly
Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2007 12:59 PM
To: Kurzweil National Federation of the Blind Reader user list
Subject: Re: [Reader-users] My Impressions After Hands-On

Jim,

Will we be able to pick up the upgrade at convention? I don't mean online
either. It would be great if we could.

Evelyn

At 07:54 AM 6/26/2007, you wrote:
>Hi joe and all,  I believe we are only days away from release 3.8,
>which includes reverse contrast text recognitionl  I have read lots of
>things that our present software will not read.  Please Stand by for
>more info.
>thanks, James Gashel
>
>sent from my wireless dash
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: "Joseph LaFauci" <joeleah at iquest.net>
>To: "Reader-Users at Nfbnet. Org" <reader-users at nfbnet.org>
>Sent: 6/26/2007 7:02 AM
>Subject: [Reader-users] My Impressions After Hands-On
>
>Hi all,
> >From my perspective, the KNFB reader has pros and cons.  I was able
> >to get
>my hands on one yesterday after having read all of the available
>on-line info.
>It is certainly the most portable device currently available and when
>you get a good picture,  it does a good job of recognizing and reading
text.
>I was disappointed in the lack of reverse text capability.  I think
>that should have been in place by now.
>The 16 or so inches focusing distance is understandable due to the use
>of a digital camera, but I personally would have opted for a scanning
>wand.  I know this would make the unit a two-piece system, but when in
>a case, the overall size wouldn't be any greater.
>I have been a user of the Optacon for many years, so I guess I'm
>telling my age, but the flexibility of that old machine was hard to

[truncated by sender]