[Reader-users] Fw: questions

Mike Freeman k7uij at panix.com
Mon Jun 4 23:05:25 CDT 2007


Janet:

Often in printed legislation, words that *were* in the law are indicated 
in some way as having been crossed out and the ssubstitute wording is 
also indicated by a change in print style or other method. Put another 
way, the law you see -- especially if it is from a recently-passed 
bill -- does not just contain the new language; it contains both old and 
new language in such a way that a sighted person can tell what has been 
changed.

Mike

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Janet Coleman
  To: Kurzweil National Federation of the Blind Reader user list
  Sent: Monday, June 04, 2007 10:44 AM
  Subject: Re: [Reader-users] Fw: questions


  I don't believe that anything was crossed out on the pages  that I was
  reading.  I believe that I was reading only the pages that had new
  legislation relating to mental health practice.  So, now I am 
wondering if I
  did something wrong with my reader  or is there something  wrong with 
my
  reader.  I tried  it at different heights --lower and higher.  I tried 
books
  and labels and bills and memos.  I just had no luck, and it was very
  disillusioning to me.
      Probably there is no reason to send a hard copy, and if I had been
  wiser, I would have just downloaded  via the computer and  had the 
computer
  read it to me.
      But still,  WHAT AM I DOING WRONG? Janet
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: "James Gashel" <jim at knfbreader.com>
  To: "'Kurzweil National Federation of the Blind Reader user list'"
  <reader-users at nfbnet.org>
  Sent: Monday, June 04, 2007 12:20 PM
  Subject: Re: [Reader-users] Fw: questions


  > Hi Janet:
  >
  > Sending me the printed copy is certainly an option.  I have printed 
the
  > page
  > and read it pretty well in version 3.4.8, which is the version you 
are
  > using.  According to your original message, I expected to get very 
little
  > text, but I was actually able to read the entire page.  Perhaps it 
has
  > something to do with the printer used to print the text for you.
  >
  > You should know that this text includes words and lines that are 
crossed
  > out.  This is a common practice in legislation.  The reader 
generally
  > skips
  > the crossed out words and reads the words that are not crossed out. 
I
  > found
  > that the text between lines 17 and 21 on page 90 was entirely 
crossed out.
  > However, the Reader did make an effort to make one or two words out 
of
  > this
  > block of text, but the attempt was unsuccessful.  Then the speech 
was
  > completely understandable once again after it reached line 21.
  >
  > Incidentally, I also brought up the same file in adobe, which is the
  > software used to read PDF files.  This is the form of legislative 
files
  > you
  > can download from the Nebraska Unicameral.
  >
  > Interestingly enough, when I went to the same page to read the text
  > between
  > lines 17 and 21 on page 90, I was able to read every word of the 
crossed
  > out
  > text without any indication whatsoever that the text had been 
crossed out.
  > This means that it is almost impossible to read and understand 
legislation
  > that contains strike-overs if you are using adobe.  Unless I knew
  > differently, I would have assumed that the words it was reading 
between
  > lines 17 and 21 on page 90 were still part of the law and had not 
been
  > crossed out.
  >
  > Finally, I brought the PDF document up on the pc using Kurzweil 
1,000.
  > The
  > results were definitely better than adobe.  I was able to tell that
  > something was definitely "messed up" in regard to the crossed out 
text
  > mentioned above, but I would have no way of knowing that it was 
really
  > crossed out.  I could pretty well assume that it had been, though, 
which
  > is
  > somewhat better than our reader.
  >
  > Here is the bottom-line:
  >
  > I will be happy to look at the hard copy page(s) if you want to send 
it.
  > Please send to:
  >
  > James Gashel, National Federation of the Blind, 1800 Johnson St.,
  > Baltimore,
  > MD 21218.
  >
  > Also, please send me an email message telling me that you have sent 
the
  > material.
  >
  > The electronic images would also be helpful if you can send them.
  >
  > Thanks, J. G.
  >
  >
  >
  >
  >
  > -----Original Message-----
  > From: reader-users-bounces at nfbnet.org
  > [mailto:reader-users-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of Janet Coleman
  > Sent: Monday, June 04, 2007 10:24 AM
  > To: Kurzweil National Federation of the Blind Reader user list
  > Subject: Re: [Reader-users] Fw: questions
  >
  > I have checked with someone who was in the original test group with 
the
  > reader.  He suggested that it might be helpful if I sent you the 
hard copy
  > from which I tried to take the pictures.  If this would  be helpful, 
I'll
  > do
  > that.  I would just need a mailing address for you.
  > Janet Coleman
  > ----- Original Message -----
  > From: "james gashel" <jgashel at verizon.net>
  > To: "'Kurzweil National Federation of the Blind Reader user list'"
  > <reader-users at nfbnet.org>
  > Sent: Monday, June 04, 2007 7:18 AM
  > Subject: Re: [Reader-users] Fw: questions
  >
  >
  >> Hi Janet:
  >>
  >
  >> I haven't had a chance to look at this yet.  However, let me also 
ask
  >> you if you have saved any of the problem images.  If the answer is
  >> "yes," my next question is, do you have the technology you would 
need
  >> to forward one or more of the images to me?  All you need is a card
  >> reader that will accept the storage card from your Reader.  Some
  >> computers have built-in card readers.  In other cases, you need to 
get
  >> a card reader that connects to the pc through the USB port.  In 
either
  >> case, the card will appear on the pc as another drive.  You can 
copy
  >> any file to a place on the hard drive of the pc and then work from
  >> there to attach the image files to an email message.
  >>
  >> If you believe you can do this, I would like to have a look at one 
or
  >> two of the images you are having trouble reading.  You can attach
  >> images to an email message, but don't send more than one (maximum 
two)
  >> with any single message.  The address to use is 
<jim at knfbreader.com>
  >>
  >> Meanwhile, we will also try to pull up the bill and look at it here 
as
  >> well.
  >>
  >>
  >> Thanks, J. G.
  >>
  >>
  >>
  >> -----Original Message-----
  >> From: reader-users-bounces at nfbnet.org
  >> [mailto:reader-users-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of Janet Coleman
  >> Sent: Monday, June 04, 2007 6:50 AM
  >> To: Kurzweil National Federation of the Blind Reader user list
  >> Subject: Re: [Reader-users] Fw: questions
  >>
  >> It is legislative bill 247.  I  was reading a section beginning on
  >> page 90.
  >>
  >> I was using a  copy of the bill that was sent  to me.
  >> thanks for your  help.  I ended up reading only the sections
  >> underlined since these were the new legislation  parts.
  >> I was finally able to make it through using the  CCTV , but I had
  >> hoped to use the reader which would've been much easier.
  >> Janet
  >> ----- Original Message -----
  >> From: "james gashel" <jgashel at verizon.net>
  >> To: "'Kurzweil National Federation of the Blind Reader user list'"
  >> <reader-users at nfbnet.org>
  >> Sent: Monday, June 04, 2007 4:07 AM
  >> Subject: Re: [Reader-users] Fw: questions
  >>
  >>
  >>> Hi Janet:
  >>>
  >>> I think the only way we can know what is going on with this image 
is
  >>> to see the pictures you are taking.  Another way, in this 
instance,
  >>> is if you give me the number of the bill, we can print it out and
  >>> take pictures of our own.
  >>> Let's start with the second option.  Please give me the number of 
the
  >>> bill, and I will try it out on this end.
  >>>
  >>> Thanks, J. G.
  >>>
  >>> -----Original Message-----
  >>> From: reader-users-bounces at nfbnet.org
  >>> [mailto:reader-users-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of Janet 
Coleman
  >>> Sent: Sunday, June 03, 2007 11:15 PM
  >>> To: reader-users at nfbnet.org
  >>> Subject: [Reader-users] Fw: questions
  >>>
  >>>
  >>> ----- Original Message -----
  >>> From: "Janet Coleman" <Janet.Coleman at Alltel.net>
  >>> To: <readers-users at nfbnet.org>
  >>> Sent: Sunday, June 03, 2007 2:49 PM
  >>> Subject: questions
  >>>
  >>>
  >>>> This entire weekend, I have been trying to get my relatively new
  >>>> reader to
  >>>
  >>>> do two things, and I've  had only minimal luck.
  >>>>    First, I have been trying to read a legislative bill just 
passed
  >>>> by the
  >>>
  >>>> Nebraska Unicameral.  I get typically two responses--no text  or
  >>>> embedded text.  There is text available.  the bill is  at least
  >>>> three spaced lines and the new legislation is underlined.  I've
  >>>> tried it in both books and labels and in bills and memos.  I have
  >>>> been able to get only a few words read and then am told end of 
text
  >>>> or embedded text.  What am I doing wrong?
  >>>>    The second thing is that I have tried to read a newspaper
  >>>> advertisement. Again although there is text, I am told that there 
is
  >>>> no text.  It is printed in black and white and while the numbers 
are
  >>>> large the text is  not.
  >>>>
  >>>> Janet Coleman
  >>>> janet.coleman at alltel.net
  >>>
  >>>
  >>> _______________________________________________
  >>> Reader-users mailing list
  >>> Reader-users at nfbnet.org
  >>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/reader-users
  >>>
  >>>
  >>> _______________________________________________
  >>> Reader-users mailing list
  >>> Reader-users at nfbnet.org
  >>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/reader-users
  >>>
  >>
  >>
  >> _______________________________________________
  >> Reader-users mailing list
  >> Reader-users at nfbnet.org
  >> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/reader-users
  >>
  >>
  >> _______________________________________________
  >> Reader-users mailing list
  >> Reader-users at nfbnet.org
  >> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/reader-users
  >>
  >
  >
  > _______________________________________________
  > Reader-users mailing list
  > Reader-users at nfbnet.org
  > http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/reader-users
  >
  >
  > _______________________________________________
  > Reader-users mailing list
  > Reader-users at nfbnet.org
  > http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/reader-users
  >


  _______________________________________________
  Reader-users mailing list
  Reader-users at nfbnet.org
  http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/reader-users
-------------- next part --------------
Janet:
 
Often in printed legislation, words that *were* in the law are indicated in some way as having been crossed out and the ssubstitute wording is also indicated by a change in print style or other method. Put another way, the law you see -- especially if it is from a recently-passed bill -- does not just contain the new language; it contains both old and new language in such a way that a sighted person can tell what has been changed.
 
Mike
 
----- Original Message -----
From:
mailto:Janet.Coleman at Alltel.net Janet Coleman
To:
mailto:reader-users at nfbnet.org Kurzweil National Federation of the Blind Reader user list
Sent:
Monday, June 04, 2007 10:44 AM
Subject:
Re: [Reader-users] Fw: questions
I don't believe that anything was crossed out on the pages  that I was
reading.  I believe that I was reading only the pages that had new
legislation relating to mental health practice.  So, now I am wondering if I
did something wrong with my reader  or is there something  wrong with my
reader.  I tried  it at different heights --lower and higher.  I tried books
and labels and bills and memos.  I just had no luck, and it was very
disillusioning to me.
    Probably there is no reason to send a hard copy, and if I had been
wiser, I would have just downloaded  via the computer and  had the computer
read it to me.
    But still,  WHAT AM I DOING WRONG? Janet
----- Original Message -----
From: "James Gashel" < mailto:jim at knfbreader.com jim at knfbreader.com
>
To: "'Kurzweil National Federation of the Blind Reader user list'"
< mailto:reader-users at nfbnet.org reader-users at nfbnet.org
>
Sent: Monday, June 04, 2007 12:20 PM
Subject: Re: [Reader-users] Fw: questions
> Hi Janet:
>
> Sending me the printed copy is certainly an option.  I have printed the
> page
> and read it pretty well in version 3.4.8, which is the version you are
> using.  According to your original message, I expected to get very little
> text, but I was actually able to read the entire page.  Perhaps it has
> something to do with the printer used to print the text for you.
>
> You should know that this text includes words and lines that are crossed
> out.  This is a common practice in legislation.  The reader generally
> skips
> the crossed out words and reads the words that are not crossed out.  I
> found
> that the text between lines 17 and 21 on page 90 was entirely crossed out.
> However, the Reader did make an effort to make one or two words out of
> this
> block of text, but the attempt was unsuccessful.  Then the speech was
> completely understandable once again after it reached line 21.
>
> Incidentally, I also brought up the same file in adobe, which is the
> software used to read PDF files.  This is the form of legislative files
> you
> can download from the Nebraska Unicameral.
>
> Interestingly enough, when I went to the same page to read the text
> between
> lines 17 and 21 on page 90, I was able to read every word of the crossed
> out
> text without any indication whatsoever that the text had been crossed out.
> This means that it is almost impossible to read and understand legislation
> that contains strike-overs if you are using adobe.  Unless I knew
> differently, I would have assumed that the words it was reading between
> lines 17 and 21 on page 90 were still part of the law and had not been
> crossed out.
>
> Finally, I brought the PDF document up on the pc using Kurzweil 1,000.
> The
> results were definitely better than adobe.  I was able to tell that
> something was definitely "messed up" in regard to the crossed out text
> mentioned above, but I would have no way of knowing that it was really
> crossed out.  I could pretty well assume that it had been, though, which
> is
> somewhat better than our reader.
>
> Here is the bottom-line:
>
> I will be happy to look at the hard copy page(s) if you want to send it.
> Please send to:
>
> James Gashel, National Federation of the Blind, 1800 Johnson St.,
> Baltimore,
> MD 21218.
>
> Also, please send me an email message telling me that you have sent the
> material.
>
> The electronic images would also be helpful if you can send them.
>
> Thanks, J. G.
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mailto:reader-users-bounces at nfbnet.org reader-users-bounces at nfbnet.org
> [mailto:reader-users-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of Janet Coleman
> Sent: Monday, June 04, 2007 10:24 AM
> To: Kurzweil National Federation of the Blind Reader user list
> Subject: Re: [Reader-users] Fw: questions
>
> I have checked with someone who was in the original test group with the
> reader.  He suggested that it might be helpful if I sent you the hard copy
> from which I tried to take the pictures.  If this would  be helpful, I'll
> do
> that.  I would just need a mailing address for you.
> Janet Coleman
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "james gashel" < mailto:jgashel at verizon.net jgashel at verizon.net
>
> To: "'Kurzweil National Federation of the Blind Reader user list'"
> < mailto:reader-users at nfbnet.org reader-users at nfbnet.org
>
> Sent: Monday, June 04, 2007 7:18 AM
> Subject: Re: [Reader-users] Fw: questions
>
>
>> Hi Janet:
>>
>
>> I haven't had a chance to look at this yet.  However, let me also ask
>> you if you have saved any of the problem images.  If the answer is
>> "yes," my next question is, do you have the technology you would need
>> to forward one or more of the images to me?  All you need is a card
>> reader that will accept the storage card from your Reader.  Some
>> computers have built-in card readers.  In other cases, you need to get
>> a card reader that connects to the pc through the USB port.  In either
>> case, the card will appear on the pc as another drive.  You can copy
>> any file to a place on the hard drive of the pc and then work from
>> there to attach the image files to an email message.
>>
>> If you believe you can do this, I would like to have a look at one or
>> two of the images you are having trouble reading.  You can attach
>> images to an email message, but don't send more than one (maximum two)
>> with any single message.  The address to use is < mailto:jim at knfbreader.com jim at knfbreader.com
>
>>
>> Meanwhile, we will also try to pull up the bill and look at it here as
>> well.
>>
>>
>> Thanks, J. G.
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: mailto:reader-users-bounces at nfbnet.org reader-users-bounces at nfbnet.org
>> [mailto:reader-users-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of Janet Coleman
>> Sent: Monday, June 04, 2007 6:50 AM
>> To: Kurzweil National Federation of the Blind Reader user list
>> Subject: Re: [Reader-users] Fw: questions
>>
>> It is legislative bill 247.  I  was reading a section beginning on
>> page 90.
>>
>> I was using a  copy of the bill that was sent  to me.
>> thanks for your  help.  I ended up reading only the sections
>> underlined since these were the new legislation  parts.
>> I was finally able to make it through using the  CCTV , but I had
>> hoped to use the reader which would've been much easier.
>> Janet
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "james gashel" < mailto:jgashel at verizon.net jgashel at verizon.net
>
>> To: "'Kurzweil National Federation of the Blind Reader user list'"
>> < mailto:reader-users at nfbnet.org reader-users at nfbnet.org
>
>> Sent: Monday, June 04, 2007 4:07 AM
>> Subject: Re: [Reader-users] Fw: questions
>>
>>
>>> Hi Janet:
>>>
>>> I think the only way we can know what is going on with this image is
>>> to see the pictures you are taking.  Another way, in this instance,
>>> is if you give me the number of the bill, we can print it out and
>>> take pictures of our own.
>>> Let's start with the second option.  Please give me the number of the
>>> bill, and I will try it out on this end.
>>>
>>> Thanks, J. G.
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: mailto:reader-users-bounces at nfbnet.org reader-users-bounces at nfbnet.org
>>> [mailto:reader-users-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of Janet Coleman
>>> Sent: Sunday, June 03, 2007 11:15 PM
>>> To: mailto:reader-users at nfbnet.org reader-users at nfbnet.org
>>> Subject: [Reader-users] Fw: questions
>>>
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Janet Coleman" < mailto:Janet.Coleman at Alltel.net Janet.Coleman at Alltel.net
>
>>> To: < mailto:readers-users at nfbnet.org readers-users at nfbnet.org
>
>>> Sent: Sunday, June 03, 2007 2:49 PM
>>> Subject: questions
>>>
>>>
>>>> This entire weekend, I have been trying to get my relatively new
>>>> reader to
>>>
>>>> do two things, and I've  had only minimal luck.
>>>>    First, I have been trying to read a legislative bill just passed
>>>> by the
>>>
>>>> Nebraska Unicameral.  I get typically two responses--no text  or
>>>> embedded text.  There is text available.  the bill is  at least
>>>> three spaced lines and the new legislation is underlined.  I've
>>>> tried it in both books and labels and in bills and memos.  I have
>>>> been able to get only a few words read and then am told end of text
>>>> or embedded text.  What am I doing wrong?
>>>>    The second thing is that I have tried to read a newspaper
>>>> advertisement. Again although there is text, I am told that there is
>>>> no text.  It is printed in black and white and while the numbers are
>>>> large the text is  not.
>>>>
>>>> Janet Coleman
>>>> mailto:janet.coleman at alltel.net janet.coleman at alltel.net
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Reader-users mailing list
>>> mailto:Reader-users at nfbnet.org Reader-users at nfbnet.org
>>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/reader-users http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/reader-users
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Reader-users mailing list
>>> mailto:Reader-users at nfbnet.org Reader-users at nfbnet.org
>>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/reader-users http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/reader-users
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Reader-users mailing list
>> mailto:Reader-users at nfbnet.org Reader-users at nfbnet.org
>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/reader-users http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/reader-users
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Reader-users mailing list
>> mailto:Reader-users at nfbnet.org Reader-users at nfbnet.org
>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/reader-users http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/reader-users
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Reader-users mailing list
> mailto:Reader-users at nfbnet.org Reader-users at nfbnet.org
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/reader-users http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/reader-users
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Reader-users mailing list
> mailto:Reader-users at nfbnet.org Reader-users at nfbnet.org
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/reader-users http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/reader-users
>
_______________________________________________
Reader-users mailing list
mailto:Reader-users at nfbnet.org Reader-users at nfbnet.org
http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/reader-users http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/reader-users


More information about the Reader-users mailing list