[Reader-users] Is it really necessary to have portrait orrientation?

James Jolley james.jolley1 at btinternet.com
Mon Jun 4 16:42:32 CDT 2007


Hi Jim and folks,

I noted that Jim mentioned in one of his messages that he often gets portrait orrientation. I can't seem to get that all that much, but still get good results if the field of view says something to the effect of, "Top, bottom and right edges are visible, 60 percent filled".

It seems to always work then. If it gives me something different like "top right and bottom edges are visible" I just move accross a bit to the left and see what comes of it. To be honest, I never really use the field of view to get it perfect, If it get 50 percent or more in, then alls fair.

Is that just me or are many users the same?

Best

-James-
-------------- next part --------------
Hi Jim and folks,
 
I noted that Jim mentioned in one of his messages that he often gets portrait orrientation. I can't seem to get that all that much, but still get good results if the field of view says something to the effect of, "Top, bottom and right edges are visible, 60 percent filled".
 
It seems to always work then. If it gives me something different like "top right and bottom edges are visible" I just move accross a bit to the left and see what comes of it. To be honest, I never really use the field of view to get it perfect, If it get 50 percent or more in, then alls fair.
 
Is that just me or are many users the same?
 
Best
 
-James-


More information about the Reader-users mailing list