[nfbwatlk] Uber sued for allegedly refusing rides to theblind and putting a dog in the trunk from The Washington Post
Walt Cone
walt.cone at gmail.com
Sun Sep 14 15:24:07 UTC 2014
I guess the question I have is why did the person give up control of there
dog so it could be put in the trunk in the first place? I got in to quite
an argument with a person from the other organization who says
The NFB is su happy and if the person had control of there dog there
wouldn't have been a problem in the first place.
-----Original Message-----
From: nfbwatlk [mailto:nfbwatlk-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of debby
phillips via nfbwatlk
Sent: Sunday, September 14, 2014 10:10 AM
To: Prows, Bennett (HHS/OCR); NFB of Washington Talk Mailing List;
tanna.shoyo at gmail.com
Subject: Re: [nfbwatlk] Uber sued for allegedly refusing rides to theblind
and putting a dog in the trunk from The Washington Post
The only question I have is what's the deal with the dog in the trunk? Ain't
no way my Neena is going into a trunk! I have had one of my dogs ride in a
back hatch, but I could reach her, pet her, talk to her, and when I arrived
at my destination I was able to get her out of the car. But a trunk where I
couldn't have
access? Hell no, we won't go!!! Debby and Neena
_______________________________________________
nfbwatlk mailing list
nfbwatlk at nfbnet.org
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfbwatlk_nfbnet.org
To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
nfbwatlk:
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nfbwatlk_nfbnet.org/walt.cone%40gmail.com
More information about the NFBWATlk
mailing list