[nfbwatlk] Talking Signs
Bob Sellers
robertsellers500 at comcast.net
Sat Sep 9 04:56:24 CDT 2006
The quiet cars and the short walk cycles is something we should be
discussing and proposing corrective actions, but I also think it is
importent that we don't make it a blindness only issue. Otherwise it makes
the blind look as though we are looking for special treatment.
Bob
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mike Freeman" <k7uij at panix.com>
To: "NFB of Washington Talk Mailing List" <nfbwatlk at nfbnet.org>
Sent: Friday, September 08, 2006 10:35 AM
Subject: Re: [nfbwatlk] Talking Signs
> With respect, although the issue of quiet cars should be addressed, I do
> not think it rises to the level of endangering our independence. Some of
> us are going to travel, quiet cars or not. And I think it quite likely
> that the issue of increasingly short WALK cycles poses an equal or
> greater danger to the blind (as to all other pedestrians) as do quiet
> cars. Neither danger will be easily or quickly resolved.
>
> Mike
>
> On Fri, 8 Sep 2006, Noel Nightingale wrote:
>
> >
> > In addition, the issue of talking signs is a distraction from the real
> > problem we are facing. That is, the real danger to us losing our
> > independence. The issue of quiet cars. Particularly, when hybrid cars
> > are in their electric mode, they cannot be heard until they are going
> > quite fast. That is the issue that government ought to be fixing.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: nfbwatlk-bounces at nfbnet.org [mailto:nfbwatlk-bounces at nfbnet.org]
> > On Behalf Of Mackenstadt, Gary
> > Sent: Friday, September 08, 2006 9:28 AM
> > To: nfbwatlk at nfbnet.org
> > Subject: [nfbwatlk] Talking Signs
> >
> >
> > I have read with interest all of the comments about talking signs.
> > Quite frankly, they do not impress me. Recognizing that I am being
> > extremely conservative on blindness issues once again, I still cannot
> > help but thinking that we spend a lot of time trying to address the loss
> > of sight. Until blind persons are independent travelers in the world,
> > using either long white canes or dogs, it seems to me that a lot of this
> > stuff concerning travel and technology is nonsense. Blind persons have
> > travelled very compidently for a long time, provided that they had had
> > the necessary training, experience and confidence. In my judgement,
> > technology like audible street signals have been more of a hindrance
> > than a help. Of course, technology has provided blind persons with a
> > lot of opportunity, particularly in school and on the job. Also
> > technology available to the general public has created barriers to the
> > blind--the list is endless. Of course, I carry a cell phone all the
> > time and have used it a couple of time when lost; so who knows what
> > might be next. Talking signs do nothing for me. Maybe, I'm just
> > narrow-minded.
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > nfbwatlk mailing list
> > nfbwatlk at nfbnet.org
> > http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfbwatlk
> >
> _______________________________________________
> nfbwatlk mailing list
> nfbwatlk at nfbnet.org
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfbwatlk
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.12.2/442 - Release Date: 9/8/2006
>
>
More information about the nfbwatlk
mailing list