[nfbwatlk] Fw: NFB Article by Dr. Maurer in today's New YorkTimes
Prows, Bennett (HHS/OCR)
Bennett.Prows at HHS.GOV
Wed Dec 20 10:06:48 CST 2006
I agree. Despite what the lawyers tell you, we need to worry more about
our principles, i.e. we believe that blindness can be boiled down to a
mere nuisance, and given the proper training, ..., say in how to
differentiate our money, we can perform equally with our sighted peers.
The NFB is really the organization that *makes* legal precedent work for
us, and not, , the other way around. In many cases, we don't file suit,
or appeal, because we don't want the wrong message or decision to come
out of the courts. But, when the chips are down, and we know our
philosophy is right, we need to speak out, and send the message that we
won't compromise. In this case, supporting the US. Treasury Department
seems to be the right thing to do. So, Gary is right, we need to
support Doctor Maurer by letting him know he's right "on the money;."
Bennett Prows
-----Original Message-----
From: nfbwatlk-bounces at nfbnet.org [mailto:nfbwatlk-bounces at nfbnet.org]
On Behalf Of Mackenstadt, Gary
Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2006 7:20 AM
To: NFB of Washington Talk Mailing List
Subject: Re: [nfbwatlk] Fw: NFB Article by Dr. Maurer in today's New
YorkTimes
It is truly a great article. I believe that our position on this issue
is really on the money--no pun intended. We need to let Dr. Maurer know
that we really support this position. I believe that our position
really reflects the organizational integrity. I also believe that a lot
of blind people, who may not belong to the NFB, support our position
because the Federal court decision does not make sense. The lawyers can
talk about legal standards all they want. However, as a blind person, I
am concerned about my role in society. As independent blind
individuals, we need few modifications to participate fully in the
community. Modifying money is not necessary for first-class
citizenship. For the most part, blind people are economically poor.
Blind individuals need access to money, not accessible money.
-----Original Message-----
From: nfbwatlk-bounces at nfbnet.org [mailto:nfbwatlk-bounces at nfbnet.org]On
Behalf Of Judy Jones
Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2006 8:22 PM
To: NFB of Washington Talk Mailing List
Subject: Re: [nfbwatlk] Fw: NFB Article by Dr. Maurer in today's New
YorkTimes
Hello to all,
This is such a great article!!!
Money can be such a great equilizer. Has anyone ever told you all,
"Sorry,
I can't take your money, you're blind." Or, "Don't worry about paying
those
bills or that mortgage; we don't accept money from blind people."
We have a hard time with gainful employment to earn money, but to my
knowledge, no one has ever stopped us as a body from spending it!
(grin)
Judy
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mike Freeman" <k7uij at panix.com>
To: "NFB of Washington Talk" <nfbwatlk at nfbnet.org>
Sent: Monday, December 18, 2006 5:26 PM
Subject: [nfbwatlk] Fw: NFB Article by Dr. Maurer in today's New York
Times
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Pare, John" <JPare at NFB.ORG>
> To: "Pare, John" <JPare at NFB.ORG>
> Sent: Monday, December 18, 2006 7:52 AM
> Subject: NFB Article by Dr. Maurer in today's New York Times
>
>
>
>
> The Midas Touch
> By Marc Maurer
> The New York Times
> December 18, 2006
>
>
> IN a ruling in a lawsuit last month, Judge James Robertson of Federal
> District Court said that United States currency discriminates against
> blind people because bills are all the same size and cannot be
> distinguished by touch. His decision was applauded by some advocates
for
> the blind, including the American Council of the Blind, which brought
> the lawsuit. But as president of the National Federation of the Blind,
> the nation's oldest and largest organization of the blind, I believe
> that Judge Robertson's ruling is wrong.
>
> Discrimination occurs when the blind are barred from enjoying
benefits,
> goods or services. This definition of discrimination is what most
people
> understand the word to mean. If a landlord refuses to rent an
apartment
> to someone because of race, color, creed or disability, then
> discrimination occurs. Sometimes people with disabilities are barred
> from certain facilities or services because of the way they are
> designed. A person in a wheelchair cannot climb the steps of a public
> building; if the building does not have a wheelchair ramp, that person
> is prevented from entering it. In another example, my group is suing
the
> Target Corporation because the company's Web site doesn't accommodate
> the special text-reading software that the blind use to surf the
> Internet. In both cases, a person with a disability is kept out of a
> public place or denied use of a service, just as African-Americans
were
> not welcome at whites-only lunch counters.
>
> But while blind people cannot identify paper currency by touch, that
> does not prevent us from spending money. When we hand merchants our
> money, they take it and provide us with the goods or services we have
> paid for, no questions asked. People with whom we transact business
> provide us with correct change if needed, and we then organize the
money
> in a manner that allows us to identify it in the future. We transact
> business in this way every day.
>
> There is no evidence that the blind are shortchanged more often than
the
> sighted; if a question does arise about a particular transaction, it
is
> the responsibility of the blind person to sort out the matter.
> Identifying money by feel, as the blind are often able to do in many
> other countries, may be more convenient, but inconvenience is not the
> same thing as discrimination.
>
> While it is crucial that minorities have a voice in society, it is
also
> the responsibility of every minority group to use that voice wisely
and
> not to cry ''discrimination'' when no discrimination has occurred. The
> blind of America will fight discrimination wherever we find it, but we
> achieve nothing by falsely portraying ourselves as victims and
engaging
> in frivolous litigation.
>
> Marc Maurer is the president of the National Federation of the Blind.
>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------
> _______________________________________________
> nfbwatlk mailing list
> nfbwatlk at nfbnet.org
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfbwatlk
>
_______________________________________________
nfbwatlk mailing list
nfbwatlk at nfbnet.org
http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfbwatlk
_______________________________________________
nfbwatlk mailing list
nfbwatlk at nfbnet.org
http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfbwatlk
More information about the nfbwatlk
mailing list