[Nfbnet-members-list] Letter of Support for H.R. 3086, the Fair Wages for Workers with Disabilities Act
David Andrews
dandrews at visi.com
Sat Feb 25 01:34:54 UTC 2012
>From: "Freeh, Jessica" <JFreeh at nfb.org>
>To: "dandrews at visi.com" <dandrews at visi.com>
>Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 07:56:51 -0800
>Subject: please post on all listservs
>Thread-Topic: please post on all listservs
>Thread-Index: AczzDNloaZYGeh1lQGutoG9QUzUy9g==
>
>February 23, 2012
>
>
>
>Dear United States Representative:
>
>
>
>I am writing to you in support of H.R. 3086, the
>Fair Wages for Workers with Disabilities Act of
>2011. If you are already one of the cosponsors
>of this bill, I thank you. If you have not
>signed on as a cosponsor, I urge you to do so as
>quickly as you can. I am also writing to you
>representing disabled Americans who are affected
>by subminimum wage payments who want this bill
>to pass. Furthermore, I am writing to you to
>sound the alarm against those who say that they
>know better what to do for the disabled than
>disabled Americans themselves. They will tell
>you that disabled Americans cannot speak for
>themselves and that they have taken on this
>burden. They are trying to deny us our own
>voice in Congress and we ask you to listen to
>the people, not to the self-appointed so-called spokesmen of the people.
>
>
>
>The National Federation of the Blind and the
>growing list of over forty other organizations
>of disabled Americans that support this
>legislation are well aware that those of you who
>are cosponsoring this legislation or considering
>doing so are receiving considerable pressure
>from representatives of sheltered workshops and
>others holding special wage certificates that
>allow them to pay less than the federal minimum
>wage. You are being told that the workers who
>receive subminimum wages in the sheltered
>workshop system have nowhere else to go, and
>that their lives would be destroyed by H.R.
>3086. Those of you from Missouri, in fact, may
>have received a piece of correspondence that
>asks, Where will Sammy, Patti, and Becky go
>when you eliminate their jobs? This flyer also
>contains quotes from parents, siblings, and
>caregivers of sheltered workshop employees,
>wondering what H.R. 3086 will mean for their loved ones.
>
>
>
>Wh<?xml:namespace prefix = st1 ns =
>"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags"
>/>atever the motives of the people behind it,
>the correspondence is based on outdated ideas
>about the capacity of workers with disabilities
>and a misguided commitment to an antiquated
>model of service to such workers. Rather than
>participating in a constructive dialogue about
>what life will be like for workers with
>disabilities, once the subminimum wage exemption
>is phased out in three years as required by H.R.
>3086, the workshops choose to circulate
>correspondence meant to pull on your
>heartstrings, to evoke your pity, and to promote low expectations.
>
>
>
>The argument of the sheltered workshops is that
>some people, particularly those with severe
>developmental disabilities, are simply unfit for
>competitive employment. This is simply
>wrong. To continue this practice when proven
>employment strategies exist is inexcusable.
>
>
>
>We are also told that these individuals must be
>given a choice. We are all for freedom of
>choice, but true freedom of choice can only come
>with unbiased and accurate information. Do
>Sammy, Patti, and Becky know that people like
>them are in fact working in competitive
>jobs? Do they know that services like supported
>employment are already available to help them
>acquire and keep such jobs? Do their parents,
>guardians, and loved ones know this? My
>experience tells me that they do not. Rather,
>they have far more likely been told by sheltered
>workshop staffwho all too often share societys
>low expectations for disabled people and have an
>obvious conflict of interestthat Sammy, Patti,
>and Becky will never achieve competitive
>employment and that the sheltered workshop is
>the best they can hope for. In short, what they
>have been told is neither accurate nor unbiased.
>
>
>
>Despite the manipulative tone of the
>correspondence, however, it is fair enough to
>ask what will happen to Sammy, Patti, and Becky
>and others like them if this bill passes. I
>believe that the answer to this question is
>limited only by the spirit, ambition, and
>imagination of disabled workers themselves, and
>by our willingness as a society to work hard to
>help them succeed in their goals. I believe
>that disabled workers can do far better than
>receiving pennies per hour. Under this bill,
>they will either earn real wages in the
>workshops that currently employ them, or they
>will receive the training and support that they
>need to obtain competitive employment somewhere
>else. Imagine for a moment that all of the
>government and philanthropic resources that are
>currently supporting the sheltered workshop
>system were redirected to finding real
>employment opportunities for people with
>disabilities. If they were, I suspect that
>solutions as yet undreamt of would emerge to
>help such individuals succeed in competitive employment situations.
>
>
>
>The sheltered workshop industry has existed for
>over seventy years. Many argue that it is an
>acceptable status quo, which must not be
>changed. We reject this formulation. Even if
>you believe that those of us advocating against
>subminimum wages do not have all the answers,
>this is no excuse for allowing the system to
>continue. The current practice of paying
>subminimum wages is unfair, discriminatory, and
>immoral, and no amount of hand-wringing about
>what may follow it can change that. Please do
>not simply let inertia direct our course. We
>are urging you and other willing partners,
>including any from the sheltered workshop
>industry, to work with us to find real solutions
>for people like Sammy, Patti, and Becky, rather
>than shrugging your shoulders and saying that
>the exploitation must continue because we as a
>society will not expend the effort to come up with anything better.
>
>
>
>There was a time in our nations history when
>African-Americans were believed to have limited
>capacity and were fit only for slave labor on
>plantations. There was a time when women were
>thought capable only of maintaining the family
>home, and thus were not even permitted to
>vote. Fortunately we realized as a nation that
>it was bigotry and low expectations that were
>defining the roles of African-Americans and
>women rather than their true capabilities. We
>realized, albeit belatedly, that America would
>be a better nation if the true capacities of
>these citizens were unleashed. Americans with
>disabilities are now calling upon our fellow
>citizens to realize that the soft bigotry of low
>expectations is condemning workers with
>disabilities to near-slave labor, and that the
>system that arises from these low expectations must be abolished.
>
>
>
>H.R. 3086 allows for a grace period of three
>years before sheltered workshops and other
>nonprofit employers currently holding special
>wage certificates must begin to pay their
>workers at least the federal minimum wage. This
>is plenty of time for sheltered workshops to
>study the business models of similar entities
>that are already paying their employees
>competitive wages and make adjustments to their
>own policies and practices. Meanwhile, policy
>makers can redirect resources to enhance
>programs like supported employment, and create
>new solutions, to help workers with disabilities
>transition to real work for real wages.
>
>
>
>As for freedom of choice: I am a person with a
>disability. I have been blind all of my
>life. I know the pain and despair that comes
>with low expectations and
>prejudice. Fortunately, I was given the
>opportunity to make real choices about my life
>and career, and to experience the joy of the
>accomplishments that can only come through full
>and equal participation in society. I want
>Sammy, Patti, and Becky to have the choices that
>I had. If workers with disabilities truly want
>to stay in the sheltered workshop that currently
>employs them, or a facility like it, then no one
>will prohibit them from doing so. However, if
>H.R. 3086 is enacted, wherever they choose to
>work, they will receive real wages that allow
>them to live fuller lives. They will know the
>satisfaction of receiving the equal pay for
>equal work that they deserve, in addition to any
>satisfaction that they may receive from getting
>out of the house and being among their
>friends. They will no longer be dependent upon
>the resources of their loved ones or on public
>assistance in order to buy the things they
>need. They will have disposable income to spend
>in the community, thereby contributing to our
>society and its economy. They will go from a
>subsistent existence to one in which they can
>enjoy taking in a movie with their friends, an
>occasional restaurant meal, and all of the other
>small pleasures of life that other American
>workers take for granted. They will become free
>people with real choices, not virtual slaves with false ones.
>
>
>
>On behalf of the National Federation of the
>Blind, the over forty other organizations that
>support this bill, and the millions of disabled
>people we represent, we urge you to join us in
>our effort to change the paradigm of low
>expectations and kindly meant but devastating
>exploitation that has too long dominated the
>lives of over three hundred thousand Americans
>with disabilities. We ask you to express the
>courage to support H.R. 3086 and the creativity
>to seek solutions that allow Americans with
>disabilities to become productive citizens. I
>thank you for your attention to this urgent matter.
>
>
>
>Sincerely,
>
>
>
>
>[]
>
>
>
>
>Marc Maurer, President
>
>NATIONAL FEDERATION OF THE BLIND
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://nfbnet.org/pipermail/nfbnet-members-list_nfbnet.org/attachments/20120224/c7312ae0/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 2012 02-23 NFB MM Letter to Reps re Fair Wages.doc
Type: application/msword
Size: 422400 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://nfbnet.org/pipermail/nfbnet-members-list_nfbnet.org/attachments/20120224/c7312ae0/attachment.doc>
More information about the NFBNet-Members-List
mailing list