[nfbcs] WebAIM Project Survey

[Nicole Torcolini]

Personally, I think that the survey could have been made in a way that could
have collected more data as well as the reasoning  behind the data.
Specifically:

1. The which web browser do you use most often could have allowed for more
than one to be selected as well as explanation as to why.
2. The which screen readers do you use could have had a place for an
explanation as well as ranking.
3. The which would have a bigger impact question should have an equal
option.
4. The text only or screen reader version of a website question should have
had two additional questions about if the other website is actually more
accessible and if the other website has the same functionality as the main
website.
5. The primary reason question should have allowed for more than one
selection.

-----Original Message-----
From: nfbcs [mailto:nfbcs-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of David Andrews
Sent: Thursday, December 26, 2013 11:28 AM
To: NFB in Computer Science Mailing List
Subject: Re: [nfbcs] WebAIM Project Survey

Steve:

I would urge you to write the webaim people.  You are right that this will
skew the survey.  It is a good organization and a valuable survey.

Dave

At 12:11 PM 12/26/2013, you wrote:
>To add to what Nicole has written, the survey has at the beginning of 
>the page a warning to Window-Eyes users which includes suggesting that 
>one might need to use another screen reader.  I took the survey with 
>Window-Eyes and did not have a problem, and I frankly question how 
>survey results can be completely objective with a statement like that.  
>As far as I can tell, it was based on a very specific way the survey 
>implemented certain accessibility standards in the survey that was 
>released a year and a half ago that Window-Eyes has since addressed.
>
>Best regards,
>
>Steve Jacobson
>
>         On Thu, 26 Dec 2013 09:30:34 -0800, Nicole Torcolini wrote:
>
> >The WebAIM Project welcomes people to complete its Screen Reader User 
> >Survey
> >#5 by January 15. These are popular questionaires, and the results 
> >from previous years, still available, are interesting:
> >http://webaim.org/projects/screenreadersurvey5/
> ><http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001TOofC-H0ko_daXHubPaIopuwZKRDODBADPW
> R8QIKA0UT>muEYc5HdsfV4frHjrMjOSV_u0Y8fIIS1HQcjWD2_1fASHgGP01hQzR-WzChA
> R8QIKA0UT>ssXgQhhGvCDTmk1I
> >PnMC1zYdw5Js6_IuuHAJXU2mTc5RIYR45B7v4dF_q3_mqpsw0GK1Uko0ftWbnEkoUtI1Q
> >8OrDbuy 
> >rgD_E-Uh57coZHLnZw==&c=VI9qJY9UdExrwZ8a0CX8IrGSKL6D3163LwyMI8ze-eluU_
> >N4yk6HO 
> >w==&ch=4Rmq949jiGyUNuEI02fx2iE9eeC1Uo2nQKKZLhS315axK8E5z7cVoA==>


_______________________________________________
nfbcs mailing list
nfbcs at nfbnet.org
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfbcs_nfbnet.org
To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for nfbcs:
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nfbcs_nfbnet.org/ntorcolini%40wavecable.co
m