[nfb-talk] Accessible currency in the best interest ofthe blind?

Mike Freeman k7uij at panix.com
Wed May 14 21:07:43 CDT 2008


Joe:

I'm not sure it has helped all that much except insofar asas it enabled 
more people in wheelchairs to be visible and, since there are more of 
them than there are of us (the blind), it allowed a few more 
opportunities to gain understanding.

I truly do not believe that accessible currency will materially afect 
how many blind persons get out and about -- better mobility training and 
a better understanding of blindness is the only real way to do that. So 
I consider your comparison of curb cuts with accessible currency to be 
in error.

Mike Freeman
... "It is human nature to think wisely and act foolishly." -- Anatole 
France


  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: T. Joseph Carter
  To: NFB Talk Mailing List
  Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 11:36 AM
  Subject: Re: [nfb-talk] Accessible currency in the best interest ofthe 
blind?


  Alan,

  Only inasmuch as curb cuts changed the perception that people in
  wheelchairs can actually get from one place to another.  Those things
  didn't really change overall perceptions of people in wheelchairs, 
just
  the idea that they now could go from one place to another.

  Prior to it, wheelchair users tell me they were constantly faced with
  employers who couldn't figure out how they'd get to work, so wouldn't 
hire
  them.  This despite the obvious: They had shown up for their 
interview, so
  they managed somehow, obviously!  In the short term, it didn't really
  change other attitudes at all.  In the long term, it really hasn't 
done
  much to remediate major ignorance and prejudice.  It has helped a lot 
of
  people grasp the notion that a person in a wheelchair is just a person 
who
  can't walk.

  Arguably, the perception that we can now identify our own currency 
isn't
  going to have as big an effect as the perception that wheelchair users 
are
  somehow magically able to get to work now that they have curb cuts. 
By
  itself, it's not eye-opening enough to have quite that much effect. 
The
  effect is not small, and it's billions upon billions of dollars 
cheaper
  than putting curb cuts on every intersection!

  As to the size of the effect..  For months after the introduction of 
the
  new bills, over the course of several years as each new denomination 
is
  released, a sighted person looking at the new money is going to have 
the
  opportunity to think something like:  It's a little shorter so blind
  people can tell it's a $10.  All it took for someone who can't see to 
know
  what this is is to be a little shorter than a $20.

  This of course keeping in mind that I only favor a currency change
  following the rollout schedule already in place where our currency is
  updated every 10-15 years, one bill every several years.  Doing 
otherwise
  makes the cost prohibitive.  Doing it this way we get it almost for 
free.
  I say almost because the money will be spent and the currency 
refreshed
  whether we get a more blind-friendly currency out of it or not.

  I assume there will be some added costs for accelerating the printing
  schedule somewhat so that the old bills can be taken out of 
circulation
  sooner, and there may be additional costs in the design phase.  Most 
of
  those costs are spread out over the better part of two decades, so 
they
  don't amount to anything significant per-year based on my best 
figuring.

  Of course, I favor a tax subsidy for vending machine owners over 
several
  years as well to cover 80% of the cost of updating their machines, 
because
  I also believe the dollar must be included in the revision.  But then, 
the
  dollar should be done last, which allows business owners time to use 
the
  tax breaks to financial advantage to make up the remaining 20% if they
  can, and time enough to actually get their machines updated for the 
new
  bills.

  The particular adaptation I support is the one that maintains the 
current
  size of the $100 bill and gradually shortens the bills.  The dollar 
would
  be a little less than two-thirds its current size when the transition 
were
  finished.  No new cash drawers needed, though after the transition is
  complete the internal divider structure of new cash drawers may change 
in
  time.

  I've been thinking about this for years now.  I'm a nerd, what can I 
say?

  Joseph

  On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 05:26:51AM -0500, Alan Wheeler wrote:
  > Joseph,
  > I can see your point, but I have my own reservations.  Will 
accessible currency *REALLY* change perceptions of the sighted that 
much?
  >
  > I only ask because I've seen people who, no matter what technology 
or other aspects of life as a blind person they are educated about, 
still walk away with all their misperceptions and misconceptions intact. 
To a degree, accessible currency might be nothing more than a band-aid 
on a broken leg.
  >
  > Alan
  >
  >
  >    Hell was full, so I came back !
  > ~~~
  > Alan D Wheeler
  > awheeler at neb.rr.com
  > IM me at: awheeler1965 at sbcglobal.net
  > Skype: redwheel1
  > Don't be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing 
of your mind, so that you may prove what is the good, well-pleasing, and 
perfect will of God.
  > Romans 12:2
  >
  > ----- Original Message ----- 
  > From: "T. Joseph Carter" <tjosephcarter at gmail.com>
  > To: "NFB Talk Mailing List" <nfb-talk at nfbnet.org>
  > Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 12:51 AM
  > Subject: [nfb-talk] Accessible currency in the best interest of the 
blind?
  >
  >
  > > Alan,
  > >
  > > I'll refer you to my own messages wherein I describe the impact on 
the
  > > perception of sighted people that we blind folk can handle money 
without
  > > getting ourselves ripped off.  Regardless of the fact that we have 
some
  > > ways to do it now, even if there's some technology dependency 
involved,
  > > sighted people still sometimes ask me how it can be done.
  > >
  > > In a job interview, they may not ask.  They may just assume you 
can't,
  > > particularly if it's not a job as a cashier necessarily, but where
  > > handling money might come up once in awhile.  I'd rather them have 
an
  > > over-simplistic view of how it would be no problem for me to do it 
than an
  > > over-simplistic view of how they think I can't.
  > >
  > > I had a couple of other thoughts on it as well, but I think they 
don't
  > > need to be repeated again.  I do think an opinion on the issue 
without the
  > > associated NFB-bashing is warranted, however.
  > >
  > > Joseph
  > >
  > > On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 07:07:00PM -0500, Alan Wheeler wrote:
  > >> John,
  > >> I may not have facts, but since the blind have survived, quite 
nicely without accessible currency, how can you back up the claim that 
accessible currency is in the "best interest" of the blind?  I'm not 
arguing the point.  I am merely asking you to back up your own 
statements.  You ask me and others for facts, show us yours, we'll show 
you ours.
  > >>
  > >> Alan
  > >>
  > >>    I tried sniffing Coke once, but the ice cubes got stuck in my 
nose
  > >> ~~~
  > >> Alan D Wheeler
  > >> awheeler at neb.rr.com
  > >> IM me at: awheeler1965 at sbcglobal.net
  > >> Skype: redwheel1
  > >> Don't be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the 
renewing of your mind, so that you may prove what is the good, 
well-pleasing, and perfect will of God.
  > >> Romans 12:2
  > >>
  > >> ----- Original Message ----- 
  > >> From: "John G. Heim" <jheim at math.wisc.edu>
  > >> To: "NFB Talk Mailing List" <nfb-talk at nfbnet.org>
  > >> Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 6:56 PM
  > >> Subject: Re: [nfb-talk] To Be or Not to Be, Irritated
  > >>
  > >>
  > >> > Alan, I have all my outgoing messages in the outbox in my mail 
program. Do
  > >> > you want me to repost them? Basically, the logic goes like 
this:
  > >> >
  > >> > 1. As the leading advocacy group for the blind, the NFB 
represents me
  > >> > whether I like it or  not.
  > >> > 2. Yetthe the NFB has done things that apparently are not in 
the best
  > >> > interest of blind people, myself included. The primary example 
is coming out
  > >> > against accessible money.
  > >> > 3. When an organization that is supposed to be an advocacy 
group does things
  > >> > against the best interest of those whom they represent, it is 
unethical.
  > >> >
  > >> > Now, which part of that are you going to dispute
  > >> >
  > >> > We've spent the last month thrashing out point #2. I've been 
begging for
  > >> > cold hard facts that might dispute it. None have been 
forthcoming.   If you
  > >> > have any, I'm still interested.
  > >> >
  > >> > ----- Original Message ----- 
  > >> > From: "Alan Wheeler" <awheeler1965 at gmail.com>
  > >> > To: "NFB Talk Mailing List" <nfb-talk at nfbnet.org>
  > >> > Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 5:45 PM
  > >> > Subject: Re: [nfb-talk] To Be or Not to Be, Irritated
  > >> >
  > >> >
  > >> >> Can you back up your claim that the NFB is unethical?  I think 
that is
  > >> >> mere opinion and baseless in fact.
  > >> >>
  > >> >
  > >> > _______________________________________________
  > >> > nfb-talk mailing list
  > >> > nfb-talk at nfbnet.org
  > >> > http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfb-talk
  > >> > To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account 
info for nfb-talk:
  > >> > 
http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nfb-talk/awheeler1965%40gmail.com
  > >> _______________________________________________
  > >> nfb-talk mailing list
  > >> nfb-talk at nfbnet.org
  > >> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfb-talk
  > >> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info 
for nfb-talk:
  > >> 
http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nfb-talk/tjosephcarter%40gmail.com
  > > _______________________________________________
  > > nfb-talk mailing list
  > > nfb-talk at nfbnet.org
  > > http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfb-talk
  > > To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info 
for nfb-talk:
  > > 
http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nfb-talk/awheeler1965%40gmail.com
  > _______________________________________________
  > nfb-talk mailing list
  > nfb-talk at nfbnet.org
  > http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfb-talk
  > To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info 
for nfb-talk:
  > 
http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nfb-talk/tjosephcarter%40gmail.com
  _______________________________________________
  nfb-talk mailing list
  nfb-talk at nfbnet.org
  http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfb-talk
  To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for 
nfb-talk:
  http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nfb-talk/k7uij%40panix.com


More information about the nfb-talk mailing list