[nfb-talk] jury dudy

Mike Freeman k7uij at panix.com
Sun Jan 6 09:39:52 CST 2008


Mike is right. I have also served on a jury without problems. But 
lawyers *are* allowed a certain number of peremptory challenges for 
which they do not have to give a reason. After they've exhausted their 
quota (a certain number for the prosecution and a certain number for the 
defense), they must give reasons for their challenges and it is at this 
point that challenges based upon blindness can be disputed, at least in 
Washington.

Mike

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: mhingson
  To: 'NFB Talk Mailing List'
  Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2008 11:49 PM
  Subject: Re: [nfb-talk] jury dudy


  Unfortunately we do not have control over what a judge might do nor do 
we
  have control over the numerous peremptory challenges both lawyers may
  exercise during jury selection.  I have been called to serve several 
times.
  I am sure that when I showed up to serve there were those who were 
concerned
  about whether or not I would be able to serve on a jury.  I simply 
made it
  very clear that I intended to serve if chosen and that blindness 
should not
  be an issue.  In December 2006 I not only served on a jury but was the 
jury
  foreman.

  Blind people can serve on juries and I know that many have done so. 
You
  should continue to encourage her friend to serve if called.


  Michael Hingson,
  For information on Michael's speaking topics and speaking availability
  please visit <http://www.michaelhingson.com>
  For information on Guide Dogs for the Blind please visit
  <http://www.guidedogs.com>
  -----Original Message-----
  From: nfb-talk-bounces at nfbnet.org [mailto:nfb-talk-bounces at nfbnet.org] 
On
  Behalf Of dewey bradley
  Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2008 11:17 PM
  To: NFB Talk Mailing List
  Subject: Re: [nfb-talk] jury dudy

  thanks for the comments!
  what's really messed up is that this guy was called and he wont, go in 
and
  see If he can but Julie Deden the director of the Colorado center for 
the
  blind, well I think It was her.
  she has been called in like 3 or 4 times, and when she shows up to 
serve,
  the judge sends her home, because she is blind.
  It might not be Julie I'm thinking about, but I'm pretty shore.  Julie 
If
  you are on this list, then was that you?
  but the point is that when people want to serve and be like everyone 
else,
  they tell you no, but when people like my friend get called, he says 
that we
  can't do It.
  I just wonder If I ever get called and show up, witch I will do, they 
might
  send me away because of him telling them that we can't do It.
  I do agree that we shouldn't make someone do It, but I don't know of 
any
  other way of doing It.
  My friend Joe, I didn't call and ask If I can talk about him, that's 
why I
  wont say his last name.
  but It was in June of 06 and the Denver post made a big deal out of 
It.
  that was so wonderful, he's blind and he can breeth by himself.

  ----- Original Message -----
  From: "David Evans" <drevans at bellsouth.net>
  To: "NFB Talk Mailing List" <nfb-talk at nfbnet.org>
  Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2008 11:18 PM
  Subject: Re: [nfb-talk] jury dudy


  >
  > Dear Dewey,
  >
  > I think that William is right.
  > Dependence is learned just the same way as independence is learned. 
If
  > you
  > have always been put down and told that you can not do things as 
well as
  > other people, then you won't.
  > He is like the whipped puppy.  When any crisis or situation comes 
along he
  > feels he can't handle he cowers and makes a puddle.
  > Anything that challenges him and he withdraws and puts on the pity 
face
  > until someone comes along to cut his meat, show him around the 
bathroom or
  > helps him to cross the street.
  > It will take something terrific to get him to change himself and his 
life.
  > Just don't let him drag you down with him.
  > As for serving on a jury.  A blind person can do it just the same as
  > anyone
  > else can.
  > I have been called several times.  I told the judge and the lawyers 
just
  > how
  > I would handle each piece of evidence and testimony.
  > I said that I would listen to the evidence, examine the exhibits and 
think
  > about what I heard to the best of my ability.
  > Paperwork, I said, could be looked at with a CCTV or by scanning it 
with
  > Open Book and read for content.
  > I told them that I might not see people clearly , but I got 
impression of
  > people by their body language and the inflection in their voice.
  > They seated me and we found the guy guilty of armed robbery.  They 
caught
  > him red handed with the loot still in his pockets and his face on 
the
  > video
  > tape doing the robbery.  Open and shut.  He hurt a lady when he 
robbed her
  > and she identified him.
  >
  > If I ever do something wrong, I hope William will be on my jury as I 
know
  > he
  > will let me go, even if I am a axe murderer.  Grin.
  >
  > David Evans, NFBF
  >
  >
  >
  > ----- Original Message ----- 
  > From: "Wm. Ritchhart" <william.ritchhart at sbcglobal.net>
  > To: "'NFB Talk Mailing List'" <nfb-talk at nfbnet.org>
  > Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2008 10:07 PM
  > Subject: Re: [nfb-talk] jury dudy
  >
  >
  >> Well, I think when I was taking Criminal Justice in college, the
  >> professor said the jury is to hear the evidence.  I too, however 
would
  >> not serve on a jury.  Not because of my vision.  But because of the 
way
  >> our system does not work.  And were I forced to serve against my 
will, I
  >> would not vote guilty.  No matter the evidence.
  >>
  >> As for your friend calling you an NFB Nazi, there is not much point 
in
  >> arguing with him.  Your best approach would probably be to teach by
  >> example and hope he wakes up and makes some changes.  Don't hold 
your
  >> breath.  Once people like your friend learn how to be helpless, 
they
  >> generally do not unlearn it.
  >>
  >>
  >> William
  >>
  >>
  >> -----Original Message-----
  >> From: nfb-talk-bounces at nfbnet.org 
[mailto:nfb-talk-bounces at nfbnet.org]
  >> On Behalf Of dewey bradley
  >> Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2008 8:41 PM
  >> To: nfb-talk at nfbnet.org
  >> Subject: [nfb-talk] jury dudy
  >>
  >> I wanted to ask everyone a question.
  >> some people agree, and some disagree with me on this one.
  >> I have a friend, I wont say his name because I'm not on this list 
to
  >> slam anyone.
  >> but this person.
  >> twice he has been called for jury dudy, and both times he has call 
and
  >> told them that he's blind and therefor can't serve.
  >> He says that blind people can't serve, because if he was a lawyer 
he
  >> would move for a mistrial, because the jury can't see the evidence 
is.
  >> When I try to tell him about my friend Joe serving 2 years ago and 
they
  >> convicted the guy, and It's still uphelt.
  >> He just calls me a NFB notsey,what ever that means.
  >> so what do you guys think about that.
  >> maybe he calls me that because when I need to cross the street, I 
just
  >> do It instead of standing there and waiteing for someone to help 
me,
  >> like he does.
  >> what would you respond to him when he says that?
  >>
  >> _______________________________________________
  >> nfb-talk mailing list
  >> nfb-talk at nfbnet.org
  >> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfb-talk
  >
  > _______________________________________________
  > nfb-talk mailing list
  > nfb-talk at nfbnet.org
  > http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfb-talk

  _______________________________________________
  nfb-talk mailing list
  nfb-talk at nfbnet.org
  http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfb-talk

  _______________________________________________
  nfb-talk mailing list
  nfb-talk at nfbnet.org
  http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfb-talk
-------------- next part --------------
Mike is right. I have also served on a jury without problems. But lawyers *are* allowed a certain number of peremptory challenges for which they do not have to give a reason. After they've exhausted their quota (a certain number for the prosecution and a certain number for the defense), they must give reasons for their challenges and it is at this point that challenges based upon blindness can be disputed, at least in Washington.
 
Mike
 
----- Original Message -----
From:
mailto:mhingson at sbcglobal.net mhingson
To:
mailto:nfb-talk at nfbnet.org 'NFB Talk Mailing List'
Sent:
Saturday, January 05, 2008 11:49 PM
Subject:
Re: [nfb-talk] jury dudy
Unfortunately we do not have control over what a judge might do nor do we
have control over the numerous peremptory challenges both lawyers may
exercise during jury selection.  I have been called to serve several times.
I am sure that when I showed up to serve there were those who were concerned
about whether or not I would be able to serve on a jury.  I simply made it
very clear that I intended to serve if chosen and that blindness should not
be an issue.  In December 2006 I not only served on a jury but was the jury
foreman.
Blind people can serve on juries and I know that many have done so.  You
should continue to encourage her friend to serve if called.
Michael Hingson,
For information on Michael's speaking topics and speaking availability
please visit < http://www.michaelhingson.com http://www.michaelhingson.com
>
For information on Guide Dogs for the Blind please visit
< http://www.guidedogs.com http://www.guidedogs.com
>
-----Original Message-----
From: mailto:nfb-talk-bounces at nfbnet.org nfb-talk-bounces at nfbnet.org
[mailto:nfb-talk-bounces at nfbnet.org] On
Behalf Of dewey bradley
Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2008 11:17 PM
To: NFB Talk Mailing List
Subject: Re: [nfb-talk] jury dudy
thanks for the comments!
what's really messed up is that this guy was called and he wont, go in and
see If he can but Julie Deden the director of the Colorado center for the
blind, well I think It was her.
she has been called in like 3 or 4 times, and when she shows up to serve,
the judge sends her home, because she is blind.
It might not be Julie I'm thinking about, but I'm pretty shore.  Julie If
you are on this list, then was that you?
but the point is that when people want to serve and be like everyone else,
they tell you no, but when people like my friend get called, he says that we
can't do It.
I just wonder If I ever get called and show up, witch I will do, they might
send me away because of him telling them that we can't do It.
I do agree that we shouldn't make someone do It, but I don't know of any
other way of doing It.
My friend Joe, I didn't call and ask If I can talk about him, that's why I
wont say his last name.
but It was in June of 06 and the Denver post made a big deal out of It.
that was so wonderful, he's blind and he can breeth by himself.
----- Original Message -----
From: "David Evans" < mailto:drevans at bellsouth.net drevans at bellsouth.net
>
To: "NFB Talk Mailing List" < mailto:nfb-talk at nfbnet.org nfb-talk at nfbnet.org
>
Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2008 11:18 PM
Subject: Re: [nfb-talk] jury dudy
>
> Dear Dewey,
>
> I think that William is right.
> Dependence is learned just the same way as independence is learned.  If
> you
> have always been put down and told that you can not do things as well as
> other people, then you won't.
> He is like the whipped puppy.  When any crisis or situation comes along he
> feels he can't handle he cowers and makes a puddle.
> Anything that challenges him and he withdraws and puts on the pity face
> until someone comes along to cut his meat, show him around the bathroom or
> helps him to cross the street.
> It will take something terrific to get him to change himself and his life.
> Just don't let him drag you down with him.
> As for serving on a jury.  A blind person can do it just the same as
> anyone
> else can.
> I have been called several times.  I told the judge and the lawyers just
> how
> I would handle each piece of evidence and testimony.
> I said that I would listen to the evidence, examine the exhibits and think
> about what I heard to the best of my ability.
> Paperwork, I said, could be looked at with a CCTV or by scanning it with
> Open Book and read for content.
> I told them that I might not see people clearly , but I got impression of
> people by their body language and the inflection in their voice.
> They seated me and we found the guy guilty of armed robbery.  They caught
> him red handed with the loot still in his pockets and his face on the
> video
> tape doing the robbery.  Open and shut.  He hurt a lady when he robbed her
> and she identified him.
>
> If I ever do something wrong, I hope William will be on my jury as I know
> he
> will let me go, even if I am a axe murderer.  Grin.
>
> David Evans, NFBF
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Wm. Ritchhart" < mailto:william.ritchhart at sbcglobal.net william.ritchhart at sbcglobal.net
>
> To: "'NFB Talk Mailing List'" < mailto:nfb-talk at nfbnet.org nfb-talk at nfbnet.org
>
> Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2008 10:07 PM
> Subject: Re: [nfb-talk] jury dudy
>
>
>> Well, I think when I was taking Criminal Justice in college, the
>> professor said the jury is to hear the evidence.  I too, however would
>> not serve on a jury.  Not because of my vision.  But because of the way
>> our system does not work.  And were I forced to serve against my will, I
>> would not vote guilty.  No matter the evidence.
>>
>> As for your friend calling you an NFB Nazi, there is not much point in
>> arguing with him.  Your best approach would probably be to teach by
>> example and hope he wakes up and makes some changes.  Don't hold your
>> breath.  Once people like your friend learn how to be helpless, they
>> generally do not unlearn it.
>>
>>
>> William
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: mailto:nfb-talk-bounces at nfbnet.org nfb-talk-bounces at nfbnet.org
[mailto:nfb-talk-bounces at nfbnet.org]
>> On Behalf Of dewey bradley
>> Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2008 8:41 PM
>> To: mailto:nfb-talk at nfbnet.org nfb-talk at nfbnet.org
>> Subject: [nfb-talk] jury dudy
>>
>> I wanted to ask everyone a question.
>> some people agree, and some disagree with me on this one.
>> I have a friend, I wont say his name because I'm not on this list to
>> slam anyone.
>> but this person.
>> twice he has been called for jury dudy, and both times he has call and
>> told them that he's blind and therefor can't serve.
>> He says that blind people can't serve, because if he was a lawyer he
>> would move for a mistrial, because the jury can't see the evidence is.
>> When I try to tell him about my friend Joe serving 2 years ago and they
>> convicted the guy, and It's still uphelt.
>> He just calls me a NFB notsey,what ever that means.
>> so what do you guys think about that.
>> maybe he calls me that because when I need to cross the street, I just
>> do It instead of standing there and waiteing for someone to help me,
>> like he does.
>> what would you respond to him when he says that?
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> nfb-talk mailing list
>> mailto:nfb-talk at nfbnet.org nfb-talk at nfbnet.org
>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfb-talk http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfb-talk
>
> _______________________________________________
> nfb-talk mailing list
> mailto:nfb-talk at nfbnet.org nfb-talk at nfbnet.org
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfb-talk http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfb-talk
_______________________________________________
nfb-talk mailing list
mailto:nfb-talk at nfbnet.org nfb-talk at nfbnet.org
http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfb-talk http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfb-talk
_______________________________________________
nfb-talk mailing list
mailto:nfb-talk at nfbnet.org nfb-talk at nfbnet.org
http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfb-talk http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfb-talk


More information about the nfb-talk mailing list