[nfb-talk] FW: Responding

Mike Freeman k7uij at panix.com
Tue Jun 12 22:26:20 CDT 2007


Sometimes a note will have both the originator's address *and* the list 
address. In such instances, even a simple Reply will go to both the 
individual and the list.

OE's command to "Reply All" is Control+Shift+R.

Mike

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Steve Jacobson
  To: NFB Talk Mailing List
  Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2007 8:45 AM
  Subject: Re: [nfb-talk] FW: Responding


  Cory,

  There may be another issue here.  If you did a regular reply as 
indicated below, then perhaps something else is happening since it 
appears his message went to
  William as well as to the list.  this does not seem to be happening 
all of the time, though.

  On Tue, 12 Jun 2007 10:56:19 -0400, Kori King wrote:

  >I think I've been responding correctly by just hitting the Control R 
in
  >Outlook Express, but just out of curiosity, what would be the command 
for
  >"Respond to all"?
  >----- Original Message ----- 
  >From: "Wm. Ritchhart" <william.ritchhart at sbcglobal.net>
  >To: <nfb-talk at nfbnet.org>
  >Sent: Monday, June 11, 2007 6:27 PM
  >Subject: [nfb-talk] FW: Responding


  >> Here is another reason for people to not use the "Respond to All." 
I
  >> meant for this response to go to the entire list.  Since I did not 
check
  >> the header, it went only to Terry.
  >>
  >>
  >>
  >> William
  >>
  >>
  >> -----Original Message-----
  >> From: Wm. Ritchhart [mailto:william.ritchhart at sbcglobal.net]
  >> Sent: Monday, June 11, 2007 5:54 PM
  >> To: 'Powers, Terry (NIH/OD/DEAS) [E]'
  >> Subject: RE: [nfb-talk] Responding
  >>
  >> Terry,
  >>
  >> You missed the point of my message in reference to the "response to 
all"
  >> option that people use when the respond.  I simply ask that when 
people
  >> respond to a list post that they do not do a "respond to all", 
because
  >> it then sends the message twice.  I don't know how many lists you 
are
  >> on.  I actually am not interested in how many lists you are on.  I 
just
  >> do not think it is needed for people to do a "respond to all."
  >>
  >>
  >> William
  >>
  >>
  >> -----Original Message-----
  >> From: Powers, Terry (NIH/OD/DEAS) [E]
  >> [mailto:powerst at dcpcepn.nci.nih.gov]
  >> Sent: Monday, June 11, 2007 9:16 AM
  >> To: william.ritchhart at sbcglobal.net; NFB Talk Mailing List
  >> Subject: RE: [nfb-talk] Responding
  >>
  >> William;
  >> What was the purpose of this message.  Just because one person 
asked
  >> what Freedom Box, was, does not mean others might not benefit from 
the
  >> answer.  I have heard the name many a time, but never knew what it 
truly
  >> was.  You need to think of the group as a whole not just yourself.
  >>
  >> Terry Powers
  >>
  >>
  >> -----Original Message-----
  >> From: Wm. Ritchhart [mailto:william.ritchhart at sbcglobal.net]
  >> Sent: Sunday, June 10, 2007 10:21 AM
  >> To: nfb-talk at nfbnet.org
  >> Subject: [nfb-talk] Responding
  >>
  >> Folks,
  >>
  >> I would like to suggest that when responding that you do not do a
  >> respond to all.  The in box is pretty full without all the 
duplicates
  >> from both the person responding and the posts from the list.  If 
you
  >> respond to a list mail, the person who you responding to will also
  >> receive the response.
  >>
  >> If your response is meant for only the person you are responding 
to,
  >> then you should be sure to not include the list address.
  >>
  >> Thanks,
  >>
  >>
  >> William
  >>
  >>
  >>
  >> _______________________________________________
  >> nfb-talk mailing list
  >> nfb-talk at nfbnet.org
  >> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfb-talk
  >>
  >> _______________________________________________
  >> nfb-talk mailing list
  >> nfb-talk at nfbnet.org
  >> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfb-talk
  >>


  >_______________________________________________
  >nfb-talk mailing list
  >nfb-talk at nfbnet.org
  >http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfb-talk




  _______________________________________________
  nfb-talk mailing list
  nfb-talk at nfbnet.org
  http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfb-talk
-------------- next part --------------
Sometimes a note will have both the originator's address *and* the list address. In such instances, even a simple Reply will go to both the individual and the list.
 
OE's command to "Reply All" is Control+Shift+R.
 
Mike
 
----- Original Message -----
From:
mailto:steve.jacobson at visi.com Steve Jacobson
To:
mailto:nfb-talk at nfbnet.org NFB Talk Mailing List
Sent:
Tuesday, June 12, 2007 8:45 AM
Subject:
Re: [nfb-talk] FW: Responding
Cory,
There may be another issue here.  If you did a regular reply as indicated below, then perhaps something else is happening since it appears his message went to
William as well as to the list.  this does not seem to be happening all of the time, though.
On Tue, 12 Jun 2007 10:56:19 -0400, Kori King wrote:
>I think I've been responding correctly by just hitting the Control R in
>Outlook Express, but just out of curiosity, what would be the command for
>"Respond to all"?
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Wm. Ritchhart" < mailto:william.ritchhart at sbcglobal.net william.ritchhart at sbcglobal.net
>
>To: < mailto:nfb-talk at nfbnet.org nfb-talk at nfbnet.org
>
>Sent: Monday, June 11, 2007 6:27 PM
>Subject: [nfb-talk] FW: Responding
>> Here is another reason for people to not use the "Respond to All."  I
>> meant for this response to go to the entire list.  Since I did not check
>> the header, it went only to Terry.
>>
>>
>>
>> William
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Wm. Ritchhart [mailto:william.ritchhart at sbcglobal.net]
>> Sent: Monday, June 11, 2007 5:54 PM
>> To: 'Powers, Terry (NIH/OD/DEAS) [E]'
>> Subject: RE: [nfb-talk] Responding
>>
>> Terry,
>>
>> You missed the point of my message in reference to the "response to all"
>> option that people use when the respond.  I simply ask that when people
>> respond to a list post that they do not do a "respond to all", because
>> it then sends the message twice.  I don't know how many lists you are
>> on.  I actually am not interested in how many lists you are on.  I just
>> do not think it is needed for people to do a "respond to all."
>>
>>
>> William
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Powers, Terry (NIH/OD/DEAS) [E]
>> [mailto:powerst at dcpcepn.nci.nih.gov]
>> Sent: Monday, June 11, 2007 9:16 AM
>> To: mailto:william.ritchhart at sbcglobal.net william.ritchhart at sbcglobal.net
; NFB Talk Mailing List
>> Subject: RE: [nfb-talk] Responding
>>
>> William;
>> What was the purpose of this message.  Just because one person asked
>> what Freedom Box, was, does not mean others might not benefit from the
>> answer.  I have heard the name many a time, but never knew what it truly
>> was.  You need to think of the group as a whole not just yourself.
>>
>> Terry Powers
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Wm. Ritchhart [mailto:william.ritchhart at sbcglobal.net]
>> Sent: Sunday, June 10, 2007 10:21 AM
>> To: mailto:nfb-talk at nfbnet.org nfb-talk at nfbnet.org
>> Subject: [nfb-talk] Responding
>>
>> Folks,
>>
>> I would like to suggest that when responding that you do not do a
>> respond to all.  The in box is pretty full without all the duplicates
>> from both the person responding and the posts from the list.  If you
>> respond to a list mail, the person who you responding to will also
>> receive the response.
>>
>> If your response is meant for only the person you are responding to,
>> then you should be sure to not include the list address.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>>
>> William
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> nfb-talk mailing list
>> mailto:nfb-talk at nfbnet.org nfb-talk at nfbnet.org
>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfb-talk http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfb-talk
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> nfb-talk mailing list
>> mailto:nfb-talk at nfbnet.org nfb-talk at nfbnet.org
>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfb-talk http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfb-talk
>>
>_______________________________________________
>nfb-talk mailing list
>nfb-talk at nfbnet.org
>http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfb-talk
_______________________________________________
nfb-talk mailing list
mailto:nfb-talk at nfbnet.org nfb-talk at nfbnet.org
http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfb-talk http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfb-talk


More information about the nfb-talk mailing list