[nfb-talk] FW: Responding

[don nepple]

s> From: koranking at cox.net> To: william.ritchhart at sbcglobal.net; nfb-talk at nfbnet.org> Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 10:56:19 -0400> Subject: Re: [nfb-talk] FW: Responding> > I think I've been responding correctly by just hitting the Control R in > Outlook Express, but just out of curiosity, what would be the command for > "Respond to all"?> ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Wm. Ritchhart" <william.ritchhart at sbcglobal.net>> To: <nfb-talk at nfbnet.org>> Sent: Monday, June 11, 2007 6:27 PM> Subject: [nfb-talk] FW: Responding> > > > Here is another reason for people to not use the "Respond to All." I> > meant for this response to go to the entire list. Since I did not check> > the header, it went only to Terry.> >> >> >> > William> >> >> > -----Original Message-----> > From: Wm. Ritchhart [mailto:william.ritchhart at sbcglobal.net]> > Sent: Monday, June 11, 2007 5:54 PM> > To: 'Powers, Terry (NIH/OD/DEAS) [E]'> > Subject: RE: [nfb-talk] Responding> >> > Terry,> >> > You missed the point of my message in reference to the "response to all"> > option that people use when the respond. I simply ask that when people> > respond to a list post that they do not do a "respond to all", because> > it then sends the message twice. I don't know how many lists you are> > on. I actually am not interested in how many lists you are on. I just> > do not think it is needed for people to do a "respond to all."> >> >> > William> >> >> > -----Original Message-----> > From: Powers, Terry (NIH/OD/DEAS) [E]> > [mailto:powerst at dcpcepn.nci.nih.gov]> > Sent: Monday, June 11, 2007 9:16 AM> > To: william.ritchhart at sbcglobal.net; NFB Talk Mailing List> > Subject: RE: [nfb-talk] Responding> >> > William;> > What was the purpose of this message. Just because one person asked> > what Freedom Box, was, does not mean others might not benefit from the> > answer. I have heard the name many a time, but never knew what it truly> > was. You need to think of the group as a whole not just yourself.> >> > Terry Powers> >> >> > -----Original Message-----> > From: Wm. Ritchhart [mailto:william.ritchhart at sbcglobal.net]> > Sent: Sunday, June 10, 2007 10:21 AM> > To: nfb-talk at nfbnet.org> > Subject: [nfb-talk] Responding> >> > Folks,> >> > I would like to suggest that when responding that you do not do a> > respond to all. The in box is pretty full without all the duplicates> > from both the person responding and the posts from the list. If you> > respond to a list mail, the person who you responding to will also> > receive the response.> >> > If your response is meant for only the person you are responding to,> > then you should be sure to not include the list address.> >> > Thanks,> >> >> > William> >> >> >> > _______________________________________________> > nfb-talk mailing list> > nfb-talk at nfbnet.org> > http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfb-talk> >> > _______________________________________________> > nfb-talk mailing list> > nfb-talk at nfbnet.org> > http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfb-talk> > > > > _______________________________________________> nfb-talk mailing list> nfb-talk at nfbnet.org> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfb-talk
_________________________________________________________________
Hotmail to go? Get your Hotmail, news, sports and much more! Check out the New MSN Mobile! 
http://mobile.msn.com
-------------- next part --------------
P { margin:0px; padding:0px } body { FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY:Tahoma }
s
> From: koranking at cox.net
> To: william.ritchhart at sbcglobal.net; nfb-talk at nfbnet.org
> Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 10:56:19 -0400
> Subject: Re: [nfb-talk] FW: Responding
>
> I think I've been responding correctly by just hitting the Control R in
> Outlook Express, but just out of curiosity, what would be the command for
> "Respond to all"?
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Wm. Ritchhart" <william.ritchhart at sbcglobal.net>
> To: <nfb-talk at nfbnet.org>
> Sent: Monday, June 11, 2007 6:27 PM
> Subject: [nfb-talk] FW: Responding
>
>
> > Here is another reason for people to not use the "Respond to All." I
> > meant for this response to go to the entire list. Since I did not check
> > the header, it went only to Terry.
> >
> >
> >
> > William
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Wm. Ritchhart [mailto:william.ritchhart at sbcglobal.net]
> > Sent: Monday, June 11, 2007 5:54 PM
> > To: 'Powers, Terry (NIH/OD/DEAS) [E]'
> > Subject: RE: [nfb-talk] Responding
> >
> > Terry,
> >
> > You missed the point of my message in reference to the "response to all"
> > option that people use when the respond. I simply ask that when people
> > respond to a list post that they do not do a "respond to all", because
> > it then sends the message twice. I don't know how many lists you are
> > on. I actually am not interested in how many lists you are on. I just
> > do not think it is needed for people to do a "respond to all."
> >
> >
> > William
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Powers, Terry (NIH/OD/DEAS) [E]
> > [mailto:powerst at dcpcepn.nci.nih.gov]
> > Sent: Monday, June 11, 2007 9:16 AM
> > To: william.ritchhart at sbcglobal.net; NFB Talk Mailing List
> > Subject: RE: [nfb-talk] Responding
> >
> > William;
> > What was the purpose of this message. Just because one person asked
> > what Freedom Box, was, does not mean others might not benefit from the
> > answer. I have heard the name many a time, but never knew what it truly
> > was. You need to think of the group as a whole not just yourself.
> >
> > Terry Powers
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Wm. Ritchhart [mailto:william.ritchhart at sbcglobal.net]
> > Sent: Sunday, June 10, 2007 10:21 AM
> > To: nfb-talk at nfbnet.org
> > Subject: [nfb-talk] Responding
> >
> > Folks,
> >
> > I would like to suggest that when responding that you do not do a
> > respond to all. The in box is pretty full without all the duplicates
> > from both the person responding and the posts from the list. If you
> > respond to a list mail, the person who you responding to will also
> > receive the response.
> >
> > If your response is meant for only the person you are responding to,
> > then you should be sure to not include the list address.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> >
> > William
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > nfb-talk mailing list
> > nfb-talk at nfbnet.org
> > http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfb-talk
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > nfb-talk mailing list
> > nfb-talk at nfbnet.org
> > http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfb-talk
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> nfb-talk mailing list
> nfb-talk at nfbnet.org
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfb-talk
Hotmail to go? Get your Hotmail, news, sports and much more! http://mobile.msn.com Check out the New MSN Mobile