[nfb-talk] FW: Responding

[Steve Jacobson]

Cory,

There may be another issue here.  If you did a regular reply as indicated below, then perhaps something else is happening since it appears his message went to 
William as well as to the list.  this does not seem to be happening all of the time, though.

On Tue, 12 Jun 2007 10:56:19 -0400, Kori King wrote:

>I think I've been responding correctly by just hitting the Control R in 
>Outlook Express, but just out of curiosity, what would be the command for 
>"Respond to all"?
>----- Original Message ----- 
>From: "Wm. Ritchhart" <william.ritchhart at sbcglobal.net>
>To: <nfb-talk at nfbnet.org>
>Sent: Monday, June 11, 2007 6:27 PM
>Subject: [nfb-talk] FW: Responding


>> Here is another reason for people to not use the "Respond to All."  I
>> meant for this response to go to the entire list.  Since I did not check
>> the header, it went only to Terry.
>>
>>
>>
>> William
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Wm. Ritchhart [mailto:william.ritchhart at sbcglobal.net]
>> Sent: Monday, June 11, 2007 5:54 PM
>> To: 'Powers, Terry (NIH/OD/DEAS) [E]'
>> Subject: RE: [nfb-talk] Responding
>>
>> Terry,
>>
>> You missed the point of my message in reference to the "response to all"
>> option that people use when the respond.  I simply ask that when people
>> respond to a list post that they do not do a "respond to all", because
>> it then sends the message twice.  I don't know how many lists you are
>> on.  I actually am not interested in how many lists you are on.  I just
>> do not think it is needed for people to do a "respond to all."
>>
>>
>> William
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Powers, Terry (NIH/OD/DEAS) [E]
>> [mailto:powerst at dcpcepn.nci.nih.gov]
>> Sent: Monday, June 11, 2007 9:16 AM
>> To: william.ritchhart at sbcglobal.net; NFB Talk Mailing List
>> Subject: RE: [nfb-talk] Responding
>>
>> William;
>> What was the purpose of this message.  Just because one person asked
>> what Freedom Box, was, does not mean others might not benefit from the
>> answer.  I have heard the name many a time, but never knew what it truly
>> was.  You need to think of the group as a whole not just yourself.
>>
>> Terry Powers
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Wm. Ritchhart [mailto:william.ritchhart at sbcglobal.net]
>> Sent: Sunday, June 10, 2007 10:21 AM
>> To: nfb-talk at nfbnet.org
>> Subject: [nfb-talk] Responding
>>
>> Folks,
>>
>> I would like to suggest that when responding that you do not do a
>> respond to all.  The in box is pretty full without all the duplicates
>> from both the person responding and the posts from the list.  If you
>> respond to a list mail, the person who you responding to will also
>> receive the response.
>>
>> If your response is meant for only the person you are responding to,
>> then you should be sure to not include the list address.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>>
>> William
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> nfb-talk mailing list
>> nfb-talk at nfbnet.org
>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfb-talk
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> nfb-talk mailing list
>> nfb-talk at nfbnet.org
>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfb-talk
>> 


>_______________________________________________
>nfb-talk mailing list
>nfb-talk at nfbnet.org
>http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfb-talk