[nfb-talk] FW: Responding

[Mary Ellen Sanchez]

Hi Kori.  How are you doing?  I hope you are well.  I am wondering doyou use
any instant messenger?   If so, I would like to talk with you.
Your Friend,
Mary Ellen.

-----Original Message-----
From: nfb-talk-bounces at nfbnet.org [mailto:nfb-talk-bounces at nfbnet.org] On
Behalf Of Kori King
Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2007 9:56 AM
To: william.ritchhart at sbcglobal.net; NFB Talk Mailing List
Subject: Re: [nfb-talk] FW: Responding

I think I've been responding correctly by just hitting the Control R in
Outlook Express, but just out of curiosity, what would be the command for
"Respond to all"?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Wm. Ritchhart" <william.ritchhart at sbcglobal.net>
To: <nfb-talk at nfbnet.org>
Sent: Monday, June 11, 2007 6:27 PM
Subject: [nfb-talk] FW: Responding


> Here is another reason for people to not use the "Respond to All."  I 
> meant for this response to go to the entire list.  Since I did not 
> check the header, it went only to Terry.
>
>
>
> William
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wm. Ritchhart [mailto:william.ritchhart at sbcglobal.net]
> Sent: Monday, June 11, 2007 5:54 PM
> To: 'Powers, Terry (NIH/OD/DEAS) [E]'
> Subject: RE: [nfb-talk] Responding
>
> Terry,
>
> You missed the point of my message in reference to the "response to all"
> option that people use when the respond.  I simply ask that when 
> people respond to a list post that they do not do a "respond to all", 
> because it then sends the message twice.  I don't know how many lists 
> you are on.  I actually am not interested in how many lists you are 
> on.  I just do not think it is needed for people to do a "respond to all."
>
>
> William
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Powers, Terry (NIH/OD/DEAS) [E]
> [mailto:powerst at dcpcepn.nci.nih.gov]
> Sent: Monday, June 11, 2007 9:16 AM
> To: william.ritchhart at sbcglobal.net; NFB Talk Mailing List
> Subject: RE: [nfb-talk] Responding
>
> William;
> What was the purpose of this message.  Just because one person asked 
> what Freedom Box, was, does not mean others might not benefit from the 
> answer.  I have heard the name many a time, but never knew what it 
> truly was.  You need to think of the group as a whole not just yourself.
>
> Terry Powers
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wm. Ritchhart [mailto:william.ritchhart at sbcglobal.net]
> Sent: Sunday, June 10, 2007 10:21 AM
> To: nfb-talk at nfbnet.org
> Subject: [nfb-talk] Responding
>
> Folks,
>
> I would like to suggest that when responding that you do not do a 
> respond to all.  The in box is pretty full without all the duplicates 
> from both the person responding and the posts from the list.  If you 
> respond to a list mail, the person who you responding to will also 
> receive the response.
>
> If your response is meant for only the person you are responding to, 
> then you should be sure to not include the list address.
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> William
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> nfb-talk mailing list
> nfb-talk at nfbnet.org
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfb-talk
>
> _______________________________________________
> nfb-talk mailing list
> nfb-talk at nfbnet.org
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfb-talk
> 


_______________________________________________
nfb-talk mailing list
nfb-talk at nfbnet.org
http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfb-talk


No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
Version: 7.5.472 / Virus Database: 269.8.14/845 - Release Date: 6/12/2007
6:39 AM
 

No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
Version: 7.5.472 / Virus Database: 269.8.14/845 - Release Date: 6/12/2007
6:39 AM