[nfb-talk] Fact Sheet Number 1:
Kenneth Chrane
kenneth.chrane at verizon.net
Thu Jan 18 20:41:47 CST 2007
Making Work Pay: Removing the Earnings Penalty
for Blind Social Security Beneficiaries
Purpose:
To amend Title II of the Social Security Act by mandating
increases in the level of earnings allowed for blind individuals before
applying a work penalty.
Background:
By increasing the Social Security earnings limit in 1996,
Congress gave seniors a powerful incentive to work. Advocates stressed that
seniors would continue to work, earn, and pay taxes since they could do so
without fearing loss of income from Social Security.
Today the need for a higher earnings limit for the blind is much
more compelling because of an all or nothing penalty for exceeding the
limit. Nevertheless, the earnings limit for blind individuals has not been
increased, though historically this limit was tied to the applicable limit
for seniors. In 2007, the earnings limit applicable to seniors is $34,400
for an individual who reaches Full Retirement Age (FRA). This limit is
adjusted annually. For blind individuals, gross earnings exceeding $1,500
monthly ($18,000 annually) cause complete loss of benefits until attainment
of FRA. At that point, as is now the case for seniors, there is no earnings
limit. This existing inequity must be rectified.
Existing Law:
Like "retirement age," "blindness" is specifically defined in
the Social Security Act and can be readily determined. By contrast,
evaluating "disability" is far more subjective. Although blindness is
specifically defined, monthly benefits are not paid to all blind people, but
only to those not working or whose work earnings are below an annually
adjusted statutory earnings limit. Personal wealth derived from all sources
other than work is subject to no penalty at all. However, excess income
generated from work results in a total loss of cash benefits for blind
beneficiaries. Recognizing the negative impact of the earnings limit on
seniors, Congress changed the law in 1996 and later eliminated their
earnings limit altogether. The present situation for blind people is
identical to that which seniors faced prior to 1996.
Examples: For the blind who find employment, earnings almost
never replace lost benefits once taxes and work expenses are paid.
Therefore, few beneficiaries can truly afford to attempt significant work,
and those who do often sacrifice income and the security of a monthly check.
The following examples illustrate the penalty for working.
§ A single blind person with no dependents having annual cash
benefits of roughly $11,700 or $978 per month (an average benefit), with no
other income, receives this amount tax-free. Gross pay to replace benefits
must be approximately $20,000, taking into account taxes (not paid without
working) and work expenses (such as commuting and buying work-appropriate
clothing). This is $2,000 above the amount blind people are allowed.
Annual earnings less than $20,000 will result in an income loss. While some
will still choose to work, many will not because they cannot afford the lost
income.
§ For a blind beneficiary with dependents, the situation is even
worse. With two dependents, the family's total benefit averages $17,500
tax-free annually. Therefore, earnings in excess of $18,000 (the annual
earnings limit for blind persons), will not replace benefits. Using
conservative assumptions, including combined state and federal taxes of
twenty-five percent of gross pay and childcare for two children at $500 per
month, replacing $17,500 in benefits would require over $32,000 in gross
pay. When dependents are involved, the choice whether or not to work is
profoundly restricted, and the amount necessary to replace combined family
benefits vastly exceeds the blind person's earnings limit.
Need for Legislation:
Steadily increasing the earnings limit for blind people over
five years, thereby linking it to the limit applicable in the year of FRA,
will allow blind people to work without facing an overwhelming financial
penalty for their effort. This would provide more than 100,000 blind
beneficiaries with an effective work incentive. In 2007 a blind individual's
earnings cannot exceed a rigid monthly limit of $1,500. Earnings exceeding
this threshold result in immediate withdrawal of the entire sum paid to a
primary beneficiary and dependents, following completion of a trial work
period. The economic risk occurring to a blind head of household negates
any possible economic benefit.
An increase in the earnings limit would be cost-beneficial.
With an estimated seventy-four percent unemployment rate, an overwhelming
majority of working-age blind people are already beneficiaries. With the
meaningful work incentive proposed here, many would become taxpayers as
well. Congress raised the earnings exemption for seniors, and Congress
alone can raise the limit for the blind. The chance to work, earn, and pay
taxes is a constructive and valid goal for senior citizens and blind
Americans alike.
Requested Action:
§ Congress should enact annual increases in the statutory earnings
limit for blind individuals over five years, ultimately linking it to that
applicable to individuals in the year they attain full retirement age. The
earnings limit should be increased according to the following schedule:
§ For 2008 $21,600
§ For 2009 $26,400
§ For 2010 $30,000
§ For 2011 $34,200
§ For 2012 the amount applicable to individuals who attain Full
Retirement Age in that year.
§ Please support Blind Americans by sponsoring or cosponsoring the
Blind Persons Earnings Fairness Act of 2007.
§ Please advise members of the National Federation of the Blind of
your commitment to sponsor or cosponsor this legislation.
Contact Information:
James McCarthy, Director of Governmental Affairs
National Federation of the Blind, 1800 Johnson Street, Baltimore, Maryland
21230
Email: jmccarthy at nfb.org Phone: (410) 659-9314, extension 2240
More information about the nfb-talk
mailing list