[Mt-blind] Mt-blind Digest, Vol 13, Issue 15
Daniel Burke
burke.dall at gmail.com
Sat Jul 28 16:09:38 CDT 2007
In the case of the one that Ted is referring to, and the one I'm referring
to, and to the three I know of in Helena right now, they are definitely loud
enough that they can easily mask the sound of traffic surges.
So it's not surprising that they make a "cuckoo" sound, is it? (grin)
By the way, we had the one in Missoula turned off.
Dan
-----Original Message-----
From: mt-blind-bounces at nfbnet.org [mailto:mt-blind-bounces at nfbnet.org] On
Behalf Of dmgina
Sent: Saturday, July 28, 2007 11:50 AM
To: mt-blind at nfbnet.org
Subject: Re: [Mt-blind] Mt-blind Digest, Vol 13, Issue 15
Hi there,
Is the sound of the light louder than the traffic going down the street.
I haven't done much with the lights having sounds.
Just did it one time with the chirping light in Michigan.
Stay safe out there.
Dar
----- source message -----
from: Edward C Robbins <robbinsec at juno.com>
to: mt-blind at nfbnet.org
date: saturday Jul 28 2007, 09:37:55
subject: Re: [Mt-blind] Mt-blind Digest, Vol 13, Issue 15
>
>
> Greetings,
> I have had my experiences with the "cookoo/chirp" signal on
> Central and 4th street in Great Falls. (It has recently been removed.)
> When ready to cross, I would focus on the sound, ignoreing the
> surge and other cues. Several times I would find my self crossing
> diagonally and once was walking up Central, past the intersection, when
> my plan was to cross it.
> I found out that the audible signal was located on one building
> and I was focusing in on the echo of the darn thing. We must use the
> skills we have learned and quit thinking that all these "marvalous"
> things for our good will save us all.
> Sincerely,
> Ted Robbins
>
> On Sat, 28 Jul 2007 09:20:15 com0600 "Daniel Burke" <burke.dall at gmail.com>
> writes:
> > You know Nancy, I had a similar experience in Missoula some years
> > ago. An
> > audible signal was put in at the corner of S. 3rd W and Russell,
> > near where
> > the BLVS offices were then located. I determined to cross there and
> > use the
> > signal one time. Despite everything I knew -- listen for the surge,
> > the
> > signal only tells you what color the light is and not that you
> > should start
> > -- the minute the thing went off I darn near jumped off the curb. It
> > gives a
> > false sense of information and security, in my view. It's easy to
> > take it
> > as a command. As it happened, I resisted the audible signal's
> > urging to get
> > into the crosswalk. Good think, as a car turned right directly in
> > front of
> > me and in some kind of a hurry to beat the surge of traffic that was
> > with
> > me. I would have been in its grill had I gone.
> >
> > Dan
> >
> >
> > ----comOriginal Message-----
> > From: mt-blind-bounces at nfbnet.org
> > [mailto:mt-blind-bounces at nfbnet.org] On
> > Behalf Of Nancy Cormier
> > Sent: Friday, July 27, 2007 9:16 PM
> > To: mt-blind at nfbnet.org
> > Subject: Re: [Mt-blind] Mt-blind Digest, Vol 13, Issue 15
> >
> > More on audible signals....
> > This is not research but a true story that teaches a good lesson.
> > In
> > Austin, TX I was working with a consumer at a very busy
> > intersection. My instructions were to wait for the appropriate
> > surge. She insisted on using the audible signal. She knew the
> > appropriate surge to travel with but was listening for the audible
> >
> > signal. The signal went off. As she started to step onto the
> > street the perpendicular traffic started to move. I pulled her to
> >
> > safety and she immediately realized the signal she heard was for the
> >
> > other direction. There was never any doubt after that incident
> > that she had to listen for the appropriate surge which comes after
> >
> > the audible signal starts.
> >
> > Nancy Cormier
> >
> > On Jul 25, 2007, at 9:50 PM, mt-blind-request at nfbnet.org wrote:
> >
> > > Send Mt-blind mailing list submissions to
> > > mt-blind at nfbnet.org
> > >
> > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> > > http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/mt-blind
> > > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> > > mt-blind-request at nfbnet.org
> > >
> > > You can reach the person managing the list at
> > > mt-blind-owner at nfbnet.org
> > >
> > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more
> > specific
> > > than "Re: Contents of Mt-blind digest..."
> > >
> > >
> > > Today's Topics:
> > >
> > > 1. Re: MAB Position on Accessible Pedestrian Signals (RJ still KJ)
> > > 2. Re: MAB Position on Accessible Pedestrian Signals (Daniel
> > Burke)
> > > 3. Re: MAB Position on Accessible Pedestrian Signals
> > > (Bernice DeHaas)
> > > 4. Re: MAB Position on Accessible Pedestrian Signals (Dan
> > Burke)
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > > Message: 1
> > > Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 13:41:36 com0600
> > > From: "RJ still KJ" <d28rik at msn.com>
> > > Subject: Re: [Mt-blind] MAB Position on Accessible Pedestrian
> > Signals
> > > To: "'Montana Association for the Blind List'"
> > <mt-blind at nfbnet.org>
> > > Message-ID: <BAY106-DAV414631C7823513F3E2CEADBF10 at phx.gbl>
> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=by iso-8859-1"
> > >
> > > President Dan and others on the list... Anyone know about the
> > > plans going
> > > down in Bozeman? Intersections on our Main Street has been torn
> > up
> > > all
> > > summer. I had heard from a couple that plans were to put audible
> >
> > > signals
> > > in. I don't know if there was any consultation such as was
> > > suggested in
> > > the 2003 resolution that Mr. Marks posted recently on this list.
> > I
> > > suspect
> > > it is possible there was some local input here, but do not know
> > > that. I
> > > would contact someone to give them a copy of the resolution if you
> >
> > > think it
> > > might be helpful. Likely as not, this is all too late for us. I
> >
> > > do not
> > > know of too many white cane users on our downtown streets other
> > > than Mr.
> > > Toohey and myself as I never run across any or hear mention by
> > > others. But
> > > perhaps there are. There are some tricky intersections in
> > > Bozeman. But if
> > > they do this to all the downtown corners it will be a noise that I
> >
> > > think
> > > will really annoy many. And even worse, in my opinion, it will be
> > a
> > > hindrance to the usual blind traveler techniques for making safe
> >
> > > crossings.
> > >
> > > Comments or information may be made to me by email at
> > > d28rik at msn.com or by
> > > phone at 406.586-4123. I don't regularly read all the posts on
> > > this list so
> > > I might miss your reply.
> > >
> > > Thanks.
> > > Rik James
> > > Bozeman
> > >
> > > ----comOriginal Message-----
> > > From: mt-blind-bounces at nfbnet.org [mailtoccmt-blind-
> > > bounces at nfbnet.org] On
> > > Behalf Of Daniel Burke
> > > Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2007 8:50 AM
> > > To: blind.grizzly at gmail.com; 'Montana Association for the Blind
> > List'
> > > Subject: Re: [Mt-blind] MAB Position on Accessible Pedestrian
> > Signals
> > >
> > > Thanks Jim,
> > >
> > > The interesting thing about audible signals is that there isn't
> > any
> > > substantive research to show that they actually increase safety
> > for
> > > blind
> > > pedestrians. The whole concept is one seemingly based on
> > > supposition -- if
> > > you can't see the signal, then you need to hear it. At about
> > > $25,000 per
> > > intersection to install, that's a pretty weak argument. For
> > even
> > > a city
> > > as small as Missoula, that would come out to nearly $3 million.
> >
> > > That is
> > > some serious government intervention with not much to justify the
> >
> > > expense.
> > >
> > > Dan
> > >
> > > ----comOriginal Message-----
> > > From: mt-blind-bounces at nfbnet.org [mailtoccmt-blind-
> > > bounces at nfbnet.org] On
> > > Behalf Of Jim Marks
> > > Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2007 9:44 PM
> > > To: 'Montana Association for the Blind List'
> > > Subject: [Mt-blind] MAB Position on Accessible Pedestrian Signals
> > >
> > > As promised, I looked up the MAB resolution on accessible
> > pedestrian
> > > signals. The resolution, which was adopted in 2003 in Butte,
> > > stands as the
> > > official policy on the audible signals. The resolution does not
> >
> > > oppose all
> > > such signals, but it certainly sets the tone that they are rarely
> >
> > > necessary
> > > or desirable. The resolution also calls for the less obnoxious
> > and
> > > more
> > > accessible vibro-tactile type. The MAB could change its policy by
> >
> > > adopting
> > > a different resolution at convention. Here is the resolution:
> > >
> > > Resolution 2003-06 Accessible Pedestrian Signals
> > >
> > > WHEREAS accessible pedestrian signals are audible and/or
> > vibro-tactile
> > > signals that provide alternative indicators for the blind when the
> >
> > > walk and
> > > do not walk signals are activated; and
> > >
> > > WHEREAS accessible pedestrian signals are expensive to install and
> >
> > > maintain
> > > and are necessary only for some rare intersections where
> > traditional
> > > orientation and mobility techniques for the blind do not work
> > > effectively;
> > > and
> > >
> > > WHEREAS blind pedestrians prefer vibro-tactile signals over
> > audible
> > > ones
> > > because vibro-tactile signals do not endanger blind pedestrians by
> >
> > > adding
> > > confusing and unnecessary noise to the soundscape, thus interfering
> >
> > > with the
> > > sounds of traffic that blind pedestrians use to cross
> > intersections
> > > safely;
> > > and WHEREAS blind and visually impaired Montanans are citizens who
> >
> > > want to
> > > spend public dollars wisely and to reinforce the notion that well-
> >
> > > trained
> > > and responsible blind and visually impaired citizens routinely
> > > cross most
> > > intersections without accessible pedestrian signals: Now,
> > therefore,
> > >
> > > Be it RESOLVED by the Montana Association for the Blind in
> > convention
> > > assembled on this fourth day of May, 2003, in the city of Butte,
> >
> > > Montana,
> > > that this organization proclaims that accessible pedestrian
> > signals
> > > are
> > > necessary for only a few intersections, not all intersections;
> > and
> > >
> > > Be it further RESOLVED that we call upon the Montana Department
> > of
> > > Transportation and city governments to consult with the Montana
> > > Association
> > > for the Blind before installing accessible pedestrian signals;
> > and
> > >
> > > Be it further RESOLVED that the Montana Department of
> > > Transportation and
> > > city governments install only accessible pedestrian signals of
> > the
> > > vibro-tactile type.
> > >
> > >
> > > Jim Marks
> > > blind.grizzly at GMail.com
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Mt-blind mailing list
> > > Mt-blind at nfbnet.org
> > > http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/mt-blind
> > >
> > > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > > Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> > > Version: 7.5.476 still Virus Database: 269.10.19/917 -- Release Date:
> >
> > > 7/25/2007
> > > 1:16 AM
> > >
> > >
> > > No virus found in this outgoing message.
> > > Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> > > Version: 7.5.476 still Virus Database: 269.10.19/917 -- Release Date:
> >
> > > 7/25/2007
> > > 1:16 AM
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Mt-blind mailing list
> > > Mt-blind at nfbnet.org
> > > http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/mt-blind
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ------------------------------
> > >
> > > Message: 2
> > > Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 18:12:54 com0600
> > > From: "Daniel Burke" <burke.dall at gmail.com>
> > > Subject: Re: [Mt-blind] MAB Position on Accessible Pedestrian
> > Signals
> > > To: "'Montana Association for the Blind List'"
> > <mt-blind at nfbnet.org>
> > > Message-ID: <013a01c7cf19$b763c6d0$0301a8c0 at upstairs>
> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=by windows-1250"
> > >
> > > Boy, it would be a shame to have audible signals downtown in
> > > Bozeman. It's
> > > one of the most walkable places in Montana on Main there, and it
> > will
> > > certainly be full of noise pollution and more difficult to track
> >
> > > traffic
> > > movements safely there.
> > >
> > > Dan
> > >
> > >
> > > ----comOriginal Message-----
> > > From: mt-blind-bounces at nfbnet.org [mailtoccmt-blind-
> > > bounces at nfbnet.org] On
> > > Behalf Of RJ still KJ
> > > Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2007 1:42 PM
> > > To: 'Montana Association for the Blind List'
> > > Subject: Re: [Mt-blind] MAB Position on Accessible Pedestrian
> > Signals
> > >
> > > President Dan and others on the list... Anyone know about the
> > > plans going
> > > down in Bozeman? Intersections on our Main Street has been torn
> > up
> > > all
> > > summer. I had heard from a couple that plans were to put audible
> >
> > > signals
> > > in. I don't know if there was any consultation such as was
> > > suggested in
> > > the 2003 resolution that Mr. Marks posted recently on this list.
> > I
> > > suspect
> > > it is possible there was some local input here, but do not know
> > > that. I
> > > would contact someone to give them a copy of the resolution if you
> >
> > > think it
> > > might be helpful. Likely as not, this is all too late for us. I
> >
> > > do not
> > > know of too many white cane users on our downtown streets other
> > > than Mr.
> > > Toohey and myself as I never run across any or hear mention by
> > > others. But
> > > perhaps there are. There are some tricky intersections in
> > > Bozeman. But if
> > > they do this to all the downtown corners it will be a noise that I
> >
> > > think
> > > will really annoy many. And even worse, in my opinion, it will be
> > a
> > > hindrance to the usual blind traveler techniques for making safe
> >
> > > crossings.
> > >
> > > Comments or information may be made to me by email at
> > > d28rik at msn.com or by
> > > phone at 406.586-4123. I don't regularly read all the posts on
> > > this list so
> > > I might miss your reply.
> > >
> > > Thanks.
> > > Rik James
> > > Bozeman
> > >
> > > ----comOriginal Message-----
> > > From: mt-blind-bounces at nfbnet.org [mailtoccmt-blind-
> > > bounces at nfbnet.org] On
> > > Behalf Of Daniel Burke
> > > Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2007 8:50 AM
> > > To: blind.grizzly at gmail.com; 'Montana Association for the Blind
> > List'
> > > Subject: Re: [Mt-blind] MAB Position on Accessible Pedestrian
> > Signals
> > >
> > > Thanks Jim,
> > >
> > > The interesting thing about audible signals is that there isn't
> > any
> > > substantive research to show that they actually increase safety
> > for
> > > blind
> > > pedestrians. The whole concept is one seemingly based on
> > > supposition -- if
> > > you can't see the signal, then you need to hear it. At about
> > > $25,000 per
> > > intersection to install, that's a pretty weak argument. For
> > even
> > > a city
> > > as small as Missoula, that would come out to nearly $3 million.
> >
> > > That is
> > > some serious government intervention with not much to justify the
> >
> > > expense.
> > >
> > > Dan
> > >
> > > ----comOriginal Message-----
> > > From: mt-blind-bounces at nfbnet.org [mailtoccmt-blind-
> > > bounces at nfbnet.org] On
> > > Behalf Of Jim Marks
> > > Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2007 9:44 PM
> > > To: 'Montana Association for the Blind List'
> > > Subject: [Mt-blind] MAB Position on Accessible Pedestrian Signals
> > >
> > > As promised, I looked up the MAB resolution on accessible
> > pedestrian
> > > signals. The resolution, which was adopted in 2003 in Butte,
> > > stands as the
> > > official policy on the audible signals. The resolution does not
> >
> > > oppose all
> > > such signals, but it certainly sets the tone that they are rarely
> >
> > > necessary
> > > or desirable. The resolution also calls for the less obnoxious
> > and
> > > more
> > > accessible vibro-tactile type. The MAB could change its policy by
> >
> > > adopting
> > > a different resolution at convention. Here is the resolution:
> > >
> > > Resolution 2003-06 Accessible Pedestrian Signals
> > >
> > > WHEREAS accessible pedestrian signals are audible and/or
> > vibro-tactile
> > > signals that provide alternative indicators for the blind when the
> >
> > > walk and
> > > do not walk signals are activated; and
> > >
> > > WHEREAS accessible pedestrian signals are expensive to install and
> >
> > > maintain
> > > and are necessary only for some rare intersections where
> > traditional
> > > orientation and mobility techniques for the blind do not work
> > > effectively;
> > > and
> > >
> > > WHEREAS blind pedestrians prefer vibro-tactile signals over
> > audible
> > > ones
> > > because vibro-tactile signals do not endanger blind pedestrians by
> >
> > > adding
> > > confusing and unnecessary noise to the soundscape, thus
> > interfering
> > > with the
> > > sounds of traffic that blind pedestrians use to cross
> > intersections
> > > safely;
> > > and WHEREAS blind and visually impaired Montanans are citizens who
> >
> > > want to
> > > spend public dollars wisely and to reinforce the notion that well-
> >
> > > trained
> > > and responsible blind and visually impaired citizens routinely
> > > cross most
> > > intersections without accessible pedestrian signals: Now,
> > therefore,
> > >
> > > Be it RESOLVED by the Montana Association for the Blind in
> > convention
> > > assembled on this fourth day of May, 2003, in the city of Butte,
> >
> > > Montana,
> > > that this organization proclaims that accessible pedestrian
> > signals
> > > are
> > > necessary for only a few intersections, not all intersections;
> > and
> > >
> > > Be it further RESOLVED that we call upon the Montana Department
> > of
> > > Transportation and city governments to consult with the Montana
> > > Association
> > > for the Blind before installing accessible pedestrian signals;
> > and
> > >
> > > Be it further RESOLVED that the Montana Department of
> > > Transportation and
> > > city governments install only accessible pedestrian signals of
> > the
> > > vibro-tactile type.
> > >
> > >
> > > Jim Marks
> > > blind.grizzly at GMail.com
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Mt-blind mailing list
> > > Mt-blind at nfbnet.org
> > > http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/mt-blind
> > >
> > > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > > Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> > > Version: 7.5.476 still Virus Database: 269.10.19/917 -- Release Date:
> >
> > > 7/25/2007
> > > 1:16 AM
> > >
> > >
> > > No virus found in this outgoing message.
> > > Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> > > Version: 7.5.476 still Virus Database: 269.10.19/917 -- Release Date:
> >
> > > 7/25/2007
> > > 1:16 AM
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Mt-blind mailing list
> > > Mt-blind at nfbnet.org
> > > http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/mt-blind
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Mt-blind mailing list
> > > Mt-blind at nfbnet.org
> > > http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/mt-blind
> > >
> > > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > > Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> > > Version: 7.5.476 still Virus Database: 269.10.19/917 -- Release Date:
> >
> > > 7/25/2007
> > > 1:16 AM
> > >
> > >
> > > No virus found in this outgoing message.
> > > Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> > > Version: 7.5.476 still Virus Database: 269.10.19/917 -- Release Date:
> >
> > > 7/25/2007
> > > 1:16 AM
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ------------------------------
> > >
> > > Message: 3
> > > Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 20:06:46 com0600
> > > From: "Bernice DeHaas" <berncom at mcn.net>
> > > Subject: Re: [Mt-blind] MAB Position on Accessible Pedestrian
> > Signals
> > > To: "Montana Association for the Blind List"
> > <mt-blind at nfbnet.org>
> > > Cc: Rik James <d28rik at msn.com>
> > > Message-ID: <000601c7cf29$aa5abab0$0a0110ac at Dimension>
> > > Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=by iso-8859-1";
> > > reply-type=original
> > >
> > > It is, I'm afraid, too late to make any changes in the Main
> > Street
> > > construction, but we have not heard of plans for audible signals
> > > there.
> > > The contracts have been let and the project is well under way.
> > For
> > > more
> > > information you can go to the Bozeman web site, www.bozeman.net,
> >
> > > and find
> > > "construction" or call the contractor, 388-4035, ext. 103. Last
> >
> > > winter John
> > > heard a rumor that they wanted to put roundabouts at 7th and
> > > Mendenhall and
> > > 7th and Main. He wrote letters to the City Commission and to the
> > City
> > > Manager protesting the idea, and the City Manager, Cris Kukulski,
> >
> > > called him
> > > in a few days. Mr. Kukulski described the project (no roundabouts
> >
> > > there)
> > > and didn't mention audible signals. He did say there will be
> > count-
> > > down
> > > timers at Willson and Main and at Rouse and Main giving a visual
> >
> > > clock of
> > > the number of seconds left before the lights change. I don't
> > think
> > > that
> > > will help blind people, but it probably will those of us who can
> >
> > > see and
> > > need to estimate how much time we have left to get across. From
> > my
> > > personal
> > > standpoint I find the audible signals really annoying.
> > >
> > > Bernice DeHaas
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Daniel Burke" <burke.dall at gmail.com>
> > > To: "'Montana Association for the Blind List'"
> > <mt-blind at nfbnet.org>
> > > Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2007 6:12 PM
> > > Subject: Re: [Mt-blind] MAB Position on Accessible Pedestrian
> > Signals
> > >
> > >
> > >> Boy, it would be a shame to have audible signals downtown in
> > Bozeman.
> > >> It's
> > >> one of the most walkable places in Montana on Main there, and it
> > will
> > >> certainly be full of noise pollution and more difficult to track
> >
> > >> traffic
> > >> movements safely there.
> > >>
> > >> Dan
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> ----comOriginal Message-----
> > >> From: mt-blind-bounces at nfbnet.org [mailtoccmt-blind-
> > >> bounces at nfbnet.org] On
> > >> Behalf Of RJ still KJ
> > >> Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2007 1:42 PM
> > >> To: 'Montana Association for the Blind List'
> > >> Subject: Re: [Mt-blind] MAB Position on Accessible Pedestrian
> > Signals
> > >>
> > >> President Dan and others on the list... Anyone know about the
> > plans
> > >> going
> > >> down in Bozeman? Intersections on our Main Street has been torn
> >
> > >> up all
> > >> summer. I had heard from a couple that plans were to put audible
> >
> > >> signals
> > >> in. I don't know if there was any consultation such as was
> > >> suggested in
> > >> the 2003 resolution that Mr. Marks posted recently on this list.
> > I
> > >> suspect
> > >> it is possible there was some local input here, but do not know
> >
> > >> that. I
> > >> would contact someone to give them a copy of the resolution if
> > you
> > >> think
> > >> it
> > >> might be helpful. Likely as not, this is all too late for us. I
> >
> > >> do not
> > >> know of too many white cane users on our downtown streets other
> >
> > >> than Mr.
> > >> Toohey and myself as I never run across any or hear mention by
> > >> others.
> > >> But
> > >> perhaps there are. There are some tricky intersections in
> > >> Bozeman. But
> > >> if
> > >> they do this to all the downtown corners it will be a noise that
> > I
> > >> think
> > >> will really annoy many. And even worse, in my opinion, it will
> > be a
> > >> hindrance to the usual blind traveler techniques for making safe
> > >> crossings.
> > >>
> > >> Comments or information may be made to me by email at
> > >> d28rik at msn.com or by
> > >> phone at 406.586-4123. I don't regularly read all the posts on
> >
> > >> this list
> > >> so
> > >> I might miss your reply.
> > >>
> > >> Thanks.
> > >> Rik James
> > >> Bozeman
> > >>
> > >> ----comOriginal Message-----
> > >> From: mt-blind-bounces at nfbnet.org [mailtoccmt-blind-
> > >> bounces at nfbnet.org] On
> > >> Behalf Of Daniel Burke
> > >> Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2007 8:50 AM
> > >> To: blind.grizzly at gmail.com; 'Montana Association for the Blind
> > List'
> > >> Subject: Re: [Mt-blind] MAB Position on Accessible Pedestrian
> > Signals
> > >>
> > >> Thanks Jim,
> > >>
> > >> The interesting thing about audible signals is that there isn't
> > any
> > >> substantive research to show that they actually increase safety
> >
> > >> for blind
> > >> pedestrians. The whole concept is one seemingly based on
> > >> supposition --
> > >> if
> > >> you can't see the signal, then you need to hear it. At about
> > >> $25,000 per
> > >> intersection to install, that's a pretty weak argument. For
> > >> even a city
> > >> as small as Missoula, that would come out to nearly $3 million.
> >
> > >> That is
> > >> some serious government intervention with not much to justify the
> >
> > >> expense.
> > >>
> > >> Dan
> > >>
> > >> ----comOriginal Message-----
> > >> From: mt-blind-bounces at nfbnet.org [mailtoccmt-blind-
> > >> bounces at nfbnet.org] On
> > >> Behalf Of Jim Marks
> > >> Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2007 9:44 PM
> > >> To: 'Montana Association for the Blind List'
> > >> Subject: [Mt-blind] MAB Position on Accessible Pedestrian
> > Signals
> > >>
> > >> As promised, I looked up the MAB resolution on accessible
> > pedestrian
> > >> signals. The resolution, which was adopted in 2003 in Butte,
> > >> stands as
> > >> the
> > >> official policy on the audible signals. The resolution does not
> >
> > >> oppose
> > >> all
> > >> such signals, but it certainly sets the tone that they are
> > rarely
> > >> necessary
> > >> or desirable. The resolution also calls for the less obnoxious
> >
> > >> and more
> > >> accessible vibro-tactile type. The MAB could change its policy
> > by
> > >> adopting
> > >> a different resolution at convention. Here is the resolution:
> > >>
> > >> Resolution 2003-06 Accessible Pedestrian Signals
> > >>
> > >> WHEREAS accessible pedestrian signals are audible and/or vibro-
> > >> tactile
> > >> signals that provide alternative indicators for the blind when
> > the
> > >> walk
> > >> and
> > >> do not walk signals are activated; and
> > >>
> > >> WHEREAS accessible pedestrian signals are expensive to install
> > and
> > >> maintain
> > >> and are necessary only for some rare intersections where
> > traditional
> > >> orientation and mobility techniques for the blind do not work
> > >> effectively;
> > >> and
> > >>
> > >> WHEREAS blind pedestrians prefer vibro-tactile signals over
> > >> audible ones
> > >> because vibro-tactile signals do not endanger blind pedestrians
> > by
> > >> adding
> > >> confusing and unnecessary noise to the soundscape, thus
> > >> interfering with
> > >> the
> > >> sounds of traffic that blind pedestrians use to cross
> > intersections
> > >> safely;
> > >> and WHEREAS blind and visually impaired Montanans are citizens
> > who
> > >> want to
> > >> spend public dollars wisely and to reinforce the notion that
> > well-
> > >> trained
> > >> and responsible blind and visually impaired citizens routinely
> > >> cross most
> > >> intersections without accessible pedestrian signals: Now,
> > therefore,
> > >>
> > >> Be it RESOLVED by the Montana Association for the Blind in
> > convention
> > >> assembled on this fourth day of May, 2003, in the city of Butte,
> >
> > >> Montana,
> > >> that this organization proclaims that accessible pedestrian
> > >> signals are
> > >> necessary for only a few intersections, not all intersections;
> > and
> > >>
> > >> Be it further RESOLVED that we call upon the Montana Department
> > of
> > >> Transportation and city governments to consult with the Montana
> > >> Association
> > >> for the Blind before installing accessible pedestrian signals;
> > and
> > >>
> > >> Be it further RESOLVED that the Montana Department of
> > >> Transportation and
> > >> city governments install only accessible pedestrian signals of
> > the
> > >> vibro-tactile type.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Jim Marks
> > >> blind.grizzly at GMail.com
> > >>
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> Mt-blind mailing list
> > >> Mt-blind at nfbnet.org
> > >> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/mt-blind
> > >>
> > >> No virus found in this incoming message.
> > >> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> > >> Version: 7.5.476 still Virus Database: 269.10.19/917 -- Release Date:
> >
> > >> 7/25/2007
> > >> 1:16 AM
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> > >> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> > >> Version: 7.5.476 still Virus Database: 269.10.19/917 -- Release Date:
> >
> > >> 7/25/2007
> > >> 1:16 AM
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> Mt-blind mailing list
> > >> Mt-blind at nfbnet.org
> > >> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/mt-blind
> > >>
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> Mt-blind mailing list
> > >> Mt-blind at nfbnet.org
> > >> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/mt-blind
> > >>
> > >> No virus found in this incoming message.
> > >> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> > >> Version: 7.5.476 still Virus Database: 269.10.19/917 -- Release Date:
> >
> > >> 7/25/2007
> > >> 1:16 AM
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> > >> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> > >> Version: 7.5.476 still Virus Database: 269.10.19/917 -- Release Date:
> >
> > >> 7/25/2007
> > >> 1:16 AM
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> Mt-blind mailing list
> > >> Mt-blind at nfbnet.org
> > >> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/mt-blind
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ------------------------------
> > >
> > > Message: 4
> > > Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:58:20 com0600
> > > From: "Dan Burke" <burke.dall at gmail.com>
> > > Subject: Re: [Mt-blind] MAB Position on Accessible Pedestrian
> > Signals
> > > To: "Bernice DeHaas" <berncom at mcn.net>, "Montana
> > Association for the
> > > Blind List" <mt-blind at nfbnet.org>
> > > Message-ID:
> > >
> > <71aeeee30707252058x430c7109g2a3c5d098d799276 at mail.gmail.com>
> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
> > >
> > > Thanks John & Bernice. Great info & vigilance!
> > >
> > > Dan
> > >
> > >
> > > On 7/25/07, Bernice DeHaas <berncom at mcn.net> wrote:
> > >> It is, I'm afraid, too late to make any changes in the Main
> > Street
> > >> construction, but we have not heard of plans for audible signals
> >
> > >> there.
> > >> The contracts have been let and the project is well under way.
> >
> > >> For more
> > >> information you can go to the Bozeman web site, www.bozeman.net,
> >
> > >> and find
> > >> "construction" or call the contractor, 388-4035, ext. 103. Last
> >
> > >> winter John
> > >> heard a rumor that they wanted to put roundabouts at 7th and
> > >> Mendenhall and
> > >> 7th and Main. He wrote letters to the City Commission and to the
> >
> > >> City
> > >> Manager protesting the idea, and the City Manager, Cris Kukulski,
> >
> > >> called him
> > >> in a few days. Mr. Kukulski described the project (no
> > roundabouts
> > >> there)
> > >> and didn't mention audible signals. He did say there will be
> > >> count-down
> > >> timers at Willson and Main and at Rouse and Main giving a visual
> >
> > >> clock of
> > >> the number of seconds left before the lights change. I don't
> > >> think that
> > >> will help blind people, but it probably will those of us who can
> >
> > >> see and
> > >> need to estimate how much time we have left to get across. From
> >
> > >> my personal
> > >> standpoint I find the audible signals really annoying.
> > >>
> > >> Bernice DeHaas
> > >>
> > >> ----- Original Message -----
> > >> From: "Daniel Burke" <burke.dall at gmail.com>
> > >> To: "'Montana Association for the Blind List'"
> > <mt-blind at nfbnet.org>
> > >> Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2007 6:12 PM
> > >> Subject: Re: [Mt-blind] MAB Position on Accessible Pedestrian
> > Signals
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>> Boy, it would be a shame to have audible signals downtown in
> > >>> Bozeman.
> > >>> It's
> > >>> one of the most walkable places in Montana on Main there, and it
> >
> > >>> will
> > >>> certainly be full of noise pollution and more difficult to track
> >
> > >>> traffic
> > >>> movements safely there.
> > >>>
> > >>> Dan
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> ----comOriginal Message-----
> > >>> From: mt-blind-bounces at nfbnet.org [mailtoccmt-blind-
> > >>> bounces at nfbnet.org] On
> > >>> Behalf Of RJ still KJ
> > >>> Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2007 1:42 PM
> > >>> To: 'Montana Association for the Blind List'
> > >>> Subject: Re: [Mt-blind] MAB Position on Accessible Pedestrian
> > >>> Signals
> > >>>
> > >>> President Dan and others on the list... Anyone know about the
> >
> > >>> plans
> > >>> going
> > >>> down in Bozeman? Intersections on our Main Street has been torn
> >
> > >>> up all
> > >>> summer. I had heard from a couple that plans were to put
> > audible
> > >>> signals
> > >>> in. I don't know if there was any consultation such as was
> > >>> suggested in
> > >>> the 2003 resolution that Mr. Marks posted recently on this list.
> > I
> > >>> suspect
> > >>> it is possible there was some local input here, but do not know
> >
> > >>> that. I
> > >>> would contact someone to give them a copy of the resolution if
> >
> > >>> you think
> > >>> it
> > >>> might be helpful. Likely as not, this is all too late for us.
> > I
> > >>> do not
> > >>> know of too many white cane users on our downtown streets other
> >
> > >>> than Mr.
> > >>> Toohey and myself as I never run across any or hear mention by
> >
> > >>> others.
> > >>> But
> > >>> perhaps there are. There are some tricky intersections in
> > >>> Bozeman. But
> > >>> if
> > >>> they do this to all the downtown corners it will be a noise that
> >
> > >>> I think
> > >>> will really annoy many. And even worse, in my opinion, it will
> > be a
> > >>> hindrance to the usual blind traveler techniques for making
> > safe
> > >>> crossings.
> > >>>
> > >>> Comments or information may be made to me by email at
> > >>> d28rik at msn.com or by
> > >>> phone at 406.586-4123. I don't regularly read all the posts on
> >
> > >>> this list
> > >>> so
> > >>> I might miss your reply.
> > >>>
> > >>> Thanks.
> > >>> Rik James
> > >>> Bozeman
> > >>>
> > >>> ----comOriginal Message-----
> > >>> From: mt-blind-bounces at nfbnet.org [mailtoccmt-blind-
> > >>> bounces at nfbnet.org] On
> > >>> Behalf Of Daniel Burke
> > >>> Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2007 8:50 AM
> > >>> To: blind.grizzly at gmail.com; 'Montana Association for the Blind
> >
> > >>> List'
> > >>> Subject: Re: [Mt-blind] MAB Position on Accessible Pedestrian
> > >>> Signals
> > >>>
> > >>> Thanks Jim,
> > >>>
> > >>> The interesting thing about audible signals is that there isn't
> > any
> > >>> substantive research to show that they actually increase safety
> >
> > >>> for blind
> > >>> pedestrians. The whole concept is one seemingly based on
> > >>> supposition --
> > >>> if
> > >>> you can't see the signal, then you need to hear it. At about
> > >>> $25,000 per
> > >>> intersection to install, that's a pretty weak argument. For
> >
> > >>> even a city
> > >>> as small as Missoula, that would come out to nearly $3 million.
> >
> > >>> That is
> > >>> some serious government intervention with not much to justify the
> >
> > >>> expense.
> > >>>
> > >>> Dan
> > >>>
> > >>> ----comOriginal Message-----
> > >>> From: mt-blind-bounces at nfbnet.org [mailtoccmt-blind-
> > >>> bounces at nfbnet.org] On
> > >>> Behalf Of Jim Marks
> > >>> Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2007 9:44 PM
> > >>> To: 'Montana Association for the Blind List'
> > >>> Subject: [Mt-blind] MAB Position on Accessible Pedestrian
> > Signals
> > >>>
> > >>> As promised, I looked up the MAB resolution on accessible
> > pedestrian
> > >>> signals. The resolution, which was adopted in 2003 in Butte,
> > >>> stands as
> > >>> the
> > >>> official policy on the audible signals. The resolution does not
> >
> > >>> oppose
> > >>> all
> > >>> such signals, but it certainly sets the tone that they are
> > rarely
> > >>> necessary
> > >>> or desirable. The resolution also calls for the less obnoxious
> >
> > >>> and more
> > >>> accessible vibro-tactile type. The MAB could change its policy
> > by
> > >>> adopting
> > >>> a different resolution at convention. Here is the resolution:
> > >>>
> > >>> Resolution 2003-06 Accessible Pedestrian Signals
> > >>>
> > >>> WHEREAS accessible pedestrian signals are audible and/or vibro-
> >
> > >>> tactile
> > >>> signals that provide alternative indicators for the blind when
> >
> > >>> the walk
> > >>> and
> > >>> do not walk signals are activated; and
> > >>>
> > >>> WHEREAS accessible pedestrian signals are expensive to install
> > and
> > >>> maintain
> > >>> and are necessary only for some rare intersections where
> > traditional
> > >>> orientation and mobility techniques for the blind do not work
> > >>> effectively;
> > >>> and
> > >>>
> > >>> WHEREAS blind pedestrians prefer vibro-tactile signals over
> > >>> audible ones
> > >>> because vibro-tactile signals do not endanger blind pedestrians
> >
> > >>> by adding
> > >>> confusing and unnecessary noise to the soundscape, thus
> > >>> interfering with
> > >>> the
> > >>> sounds of traffic that blind pedestrians use to cross
> > intersections
> > >>> safely;
> > >>> and WHEREAS blind and visually impaired Montanans are citizens
> >
> > >>> who want to
> > >>> spend public dollars wisely and to reinforce the notion that
> > well-
> > >>> trained
> > >>> and responsible blind and visually impaired citizens routinely
> >
> > >>> cross most
> > >>> intersections without accessible pedestrian signals: Now,
> > therefore,
> > >>>
> > >>> Be it RESOLVED by the Montana Association for the Blind in
> > >>> convention
> > >>> assembled on this fourth day of May, 2003, in the city of Butte,
> >
> > >>> Montana,
> > >>> that this organization proclaims that accessible pedestrian
> > >>> signals are
> > >>> necessary for only a few intersections, not all intersections;
> > and
> > >>>
> > >>> Be it further RESOLVED that we call upon the Montana Department
> > of
> > >>> Transportation and city governments to consult with the Montana
> > >>> Association
> > >>> for the Blind before installing accessible pedestrian signals;
> > and
> > >>>
> > >>> Be it further RESOLVED that the Montana Department of
> > >>> Transportation and
> > >>> city governments install only accessible pedestrian signals of
> > the
> > >>> vibro-tactile type.
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> Jim Marks
> > >>> blind.grizzly at GMail.com
> > >>>
> > >>> _______________________________________________
> > >>> Mt-blind mailing list
> > >>> Mt-blind at nfbnet.org
> > >>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/mt-blind
> > >>>
> > >>> No virus found in this incoming message.
> > >>> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> > >>> Version: 7.5.476 still Virus Database: 269.10.19/917 -- Release
Date:
> >
> > >>> 7/25/2007
> > >>> 1:16 AM
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> > >>> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> > >>> Version: 7.5.476 still Virus Database: 269.10.19/917 -- Release
Date:
> >
> > >>> 7/25/2007
> > >>> 1:16 AM
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> _______________________________________________
> > >>> Mt-blind mailing list
> > >>> Mt-blind at nfbnet.org
> > >>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/mt-blind
> > >>>
> > >>> _______________________________________________
> > >>> Mt-blind mailing list
> > >>> Mt-blind at nfbnet.org
> > >>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/mt-blind
> > >>>
> > >>> No virus found in this incoming message.
> > >>> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> > >>> Version: 7.5.476 still Virus Database: 269.10.19/917 -- Release
Date:
> >
> > >>> 7/25/2007
> > >>> 1:16 AM
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> > >>> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> > >>> Version: 7.5.476 still Virus Database: 269.10.19/917 -- Release
Date:
> >
> > >>> 7/25/2007
> > >>> 1:16 AM
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> _______________________________________________
> > >>> Mt-blind mailing list
> > >>> Mt-blind at nfbnet.org
> > >>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/mt-blind
> > >>
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> Mt-blind mailing list
> > >> Mt-blind at nfbnet.org
> > >> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/mt-blind
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > > ------------------------------
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Mt-blind mailing list
> > > Mt-blind at nfbnet.org
> > > http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/mt-blind
> > >
> > >
> > > End of Mt-blind Digest, Vol 13, Issue 15
> > >
inininininininininininininininininininininininininininininininininininininin
inininininininininininininininininininininininininininininininininininininin
inin*
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Mt-blind mailing list
> > Mt-blind at nfbnet.org
> > http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/mt-blind
> >
> > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> > Version: 7.5.476 still Virus Database: 269.10.22/923 -- Release Date:
> > 7/27/2007
> > 6:01 PM
> >
> >
> > No virus found in this outgoing message.
> > Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> > Version: 7.5.476 still Virus Database: 269.10.22/923 -- Release Date:
> > 7/27/2007
> > 6:01 PM
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Mt-blind mailing list
> > Mt-blind at nfbnet.org
> > http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/mt-blind
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mt-blind mailing list
> Mt-blind at nfbnet.org
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/mt-blind
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/mt-blind
Dar
www.mypowermall.com/biz/home/5779
every saint has a past
every sinner has a future
_______________________________________________
Mt-blind mailing list
Mt-blind at nfbnet.org
http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/mt-blind
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.10.22/923 - Release Date: 7/27/2007
6:01 PM
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.10.22/923 - Release Date: 7/27/2007
6:01 PM
More information about the Mt-blind
mailing list