[Jobs] Making LiveOpps Accessible?

[Everett Gavel]

Hi Dave, and all,

"High & mighty," Dave?  Is speaking the truth now
considered to be high and mighty?  Heh, I can't wait to
read the rest of the feeback I see in my inbox.

It's depressing to hear about the Java problem.
Definitely.  But as for being "high and mighty," no,
don't think so.  Sometimes the truth is harsh, and what
I said about the too typical Q&A's on these lists is
just that, the truth.  Harsh, yes.  True?  Yes.  I'm
sure I'm going to get a lot more "high and mighty"
comments for simply saying it out loud, though.  That's
fine.  We don't all have to agree.  Things get boring
when that happens.  ;-)

That does suck, about the Java bit, though.  Thanks for
setting me on the right path, there, Dave.  I remember
way back when, hearing about that problem.  I did
obviously make the mistake of *assuming* that it was
fixed or worked-around by now, these years later.

I'm sure some will say that I also assume too much with
my comments on how some seem to look harder for an
easy-out rather than striving to find a "can-do," to
getting a job.  I disagree, of course.  And it's not
arrogance.  It's just one observation made over the
years of being here.

Anyway, thanks Dave.


Sincerely,
Everett
www.everettgavel.com


----- Original Message -----
> Everet,  Before you get all high and mighty, and give
us a lecture, we probably should know why this LiveOps
opportunity has been said to be inaccessible.
>
> At the risk of speculating, I noticed that one of the
requirements was to have a certain version of Java
installed.  So, I would guess that their system is not
accessible because of the use of Java.  This is not a
situation that can be fixed with JAWS scripts.
>
> It could take hundreds of thousands of dollars, and
months, if not years of development time to fix a
problem like this.
>
> It isn't to say that it shouldn't be done, however we
should find out what is going on before we run off
yelling.
>