[gui-talk] adobe audition3

[Steve Jacobson]

Josh,

I suggested Gold Wave before I knew you had Audition 1.5.  Audition 1.5 does have more but it was four or five times 
the price.  It is pretty good, though.  When it came out, it was quite a bit cheaper than Sound Forge with noise reduction 
making it very attractive.  Sound Forge has come down in price some now, though.times the 

On Fri, 16 May 2008 23:12:14 -0400, Josh wrote:

>I really like audition1.5 because it has lots more effects than gold wave 
>has.

>Josh

>email: jkenn337 at gmail.com
>msn: kenn6498ku at hotmail.com
>skype: jkenn337
>----- Original Message ----- 
>From: "Steve Jacobson" <steve.jacobson at visi.com>
>To: "NFBnet GUI Talk Mailing List" <gui-talk at nfbnet.org>
>Sent: Friday, May 16, 2008 11:05 PM
>Subject: Re: [gui-talk] adobe audition3


>> Josh,
>>
>> As I said previously, I have heard that it is about as accessible as 
>> version 2.  Somethings worked all right and some
>> things did not.  I have stuck with Audition 1.5 for now.  I think there 
>> are JFW scripts for 1.5, but I use Window-Eyes and
>> have gotten by pretty well using the mouse keys when I need to.  You can 
>> also define many keys within Audition itself
>> so I've done some of that.  It would certainly be possible to do more with 
>> "SET" files than I have done, but sometimes I
>> find it more productive to just use an application rather than spend a lot 
>> of time to save a little since I don't use it that
>> often.
>>
>> Adobe has always let one have multiple versions of Audition on a system. 
>> For example, I had versions 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0
>> on my system at the same time, so why don't you try the demo of 3.0 and 
>> let us know what you find.  In 2.0, the time
>> window couldn't be read as it can with 1.5, so you could check to see if 
>> the same is true in 3.0.  Some of the plug-in
>> effects don't speak in 2.0, either.  When I say "don't speak," I don't 
>> mean that they don't talk automatically, rather the
>> text simply does not seem to be there when using a screen reader, even 
>> using the mouse keys or JFW cursor.
>> However, it isn't all text that doesn' appear, some is fine.  That's why 
>> it is hard to give you a yes or no answer.  Someone
>> who really wanted something that version 2 or 3 had might figure out how 
>> to live with the shortcomings.  If you plan to
>> use Audition for multitrack recording using the Multitrack view, people 
>> tell me that Sonar is a better bet.  My use of
>> Audition has pretty much been limited to stereo recording, mostly getting 
>> material off old tapes and records, applying a
>> little noise reduction, and then putting the results on CD, so I don't use 
>> the multitrack view much.
>>
>> If you get a more positive response from someone on one of the other lists 
>> you have written to, I would like to hear about
>> it.
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Steve Jacobson
>>
>>
>> On Fri, 16 May 2008 20:33:49 -0400, Josh wrote:
>>
>>>Hi,
>>>I have adobe audition1.5. Is adobe audition3 accessible or not?
>>
>>>Josh
>>
>>>email: jkenn337 at gmail.com
>>>msn: kenn6498ku at hotmail.com
>>>skype: jkenn337
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>gui-talk mailing list
>>>gui-talk at nfbnet.org
>>>http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gui-talk
>>>To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for 
>>>gui-talk:
>>>http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/gui-talk/steve.jacobson%40visi.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> gui-talk mailing list
>> gui-talk at nfbnet.org
>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gui-talk
>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for 
>> gui-talk:
>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/gui-talk/jkenn337%40gmail.com 

>_______________________________________________
>gui-talk mailing list
>gui-talk at nfbnet.org
>http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gui-talk
>To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for gui-talk:
>http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/gui-talk/steve.jacobson%40visi.com