[gui-talk] adobe audition3

Josh jkenn337 at gmail.com
Fri May 16 22:12:14 CDT 2008


I really like audition1.5 because it has lots more effects than gold wave 
has.

Josh

email: jkenn337 at gmail.com
msn: kenn6498ku at hotmail.com
skype: jkenn337
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Steve Jacobson" <steve.jacobson at visi.com>
To: "NFBnet GUI Talk Mailing List" <gui-talk at nfbnet.org>
Sent: Friday, May 16, 2008 11:05 PM
Subject: Re: [gui-talk] adobe audition3


> Josh,
>
> As I said previously, I have heard that it is about as accessible as 
> version 2.  Somethings worked all right and some
> things did not.  I have stuck with Audition 1.5 for now.  I think there 
> are JFW scripts for 1.5, but I use Window-Eyes and
> have gotten by pretty well using the mouse keys when I need to.  You can 
> also define many keys within Audition itself
> so I've done some of that.  It would certainly be possible to do more with 
> "SET" files than I have done, but sometimes I
> find it more productive to just use an application rather than spend a lot 
> of time to save a little since I don't use it that
> often.
>
> Adobe has always let one have multiple versions of Audition on a system. 
> For example, I had versions 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0
> on my system at the same time, so why don't you try the demo of 3.0 and 
> let us know what you find.  In 2.0, the time
> window couldn't be read as it can with 1.5, so you could check to see if 
> the same is true in 3.0.  Some of the plug-in
> effects don't speak in 2.0, either.  When I say "don't speak," I don't 
> mean that they don't talk automatically, rather the
> text simply does not seem to be there when using a screen reader, even 
> using the mouse keys or JFW cursor.
> However, it isn't all text that doesn' appear, some is fine.  That's why 
> it is hard to give you a yes or no answer.  Someone
> who really wanted something that version 2 or 3 had might figure out how 
> to live with the shortcomings.  If you plan to
> use Audition for multitrack recording using the Multitrack view, people 
> tell me that Sonar is a better bet.  My use of
> Audition has pretty much been limited to stereo recording, mostly getting 
> material off old tapes and records, applying a
> little noise reduction, and then putting the results on CD, so I don't use 
> the multitrack view much.
>
> If you get a more positive response from someone on one of the other lists 
> you have written to, I would like to hear about
> it.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Steve Jacobson
>
>
> On Fri, 16 May 2008 20:33:49 -0400, Josh wrote:
>
>>Hi,
>>I have adobe audition1.5. Is adobe audition3 accessible or not?
>
>>Josh
>
>>email: jkenn337 at gmail.com
>>msn: kenn6498ku at hotmail.com
>>skype: jkenn337
>>_______________________________________________
>>gui-talk mailing list
>>gui-talk at nfbnet.org
>>http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gui-talk
>>To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for 
>>gui-talk:
>>http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/gui-talk/steve.jacobson%40visi.com
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gui-talk mailing list
> gui-talk at nfbnet.org
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gui-talk
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for 
> gui-talk:
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/gui-talk/jkenn337%40gmail.com 



More information about the gui-talk mailing list