[gui-talk] Burning CD's

[Wayne Merritt]

Why would you burn at a lower speed? Just curious.

Wayne
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "albert griffith" <albertpgriffith at hotmail.com>
To: "'NFBnet GUI Talk Mailing List'" <gui-talk at nfbnet.org>
Sent: Sunday, April 22, 2007 3:31 AM
Subject: Re: [gui-talk] Burning CD's


> Yes.  Also, I'd cut the burn speed to 24x and make sure you have born 
> proof
> protection on.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: gui-talk-bounces at nfbnet.org [mailto:gui-talk-bounces at nfbnet.org] On
> Behalf Of slery
> Sent: Sunday, April 22, 2007 1:12 AM
> To: NFBnet GUI Talk Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [gui-talk] Burning CD's
>
> For best quality, it is better to use 4x regardless of what your computer 
> is
> capable of.
>
> Cindy
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: gui-talk-bounces at nfbnet.org [mailto:gui-talk-bounces at nfbnet.org]On
> Behalf Of Wayne Merritt
> Sent: Saturday, April 21, 2007 10:56 PM
> To: GUI Talk
> Subject: [gui-talk] Burning CD's
>
>
> Greetings. I have a basic burning question. I think I know the answer to
> this, but I want to be sure. I have an older computer that burns at a 32X
> speed. Even if I get CDR's that can be burned at 52X, my computer will 
> still
> burn at the 32X rate of my drive, right?
>
> Many thanks,
> Wayne
> www.wayneism.com
> My blog:
> http://wayneism.blogspot.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> gui-talk mailing list
> gui-talk at nfbnet.org
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gui-talk
>
> _______________________________________________
> gui-talk mailing list
> gui-talk at nfbnet.org
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gui-talk
>