[Colorado-talk] question as to whether a legally blind jurortainted a criminal trial

[Angela Long]

OK I have to respond to this. You don't HAVE to declare your disability when
you go to jury duty. You can go through a trial, listen to the arguments,
and then examine the evidence when you go to deliberations. They give
everything to you then so you can look at it closely at that time. Now on a
personal note-I sat on a jury for a serial rapist several years ago, and I
did declare my disability. They asked me what I needed, and I told them that
I would probably need to see evidence at a very close range. So, all I had
to do was ask for it and they would post the evidence to the jury during the
trial. They also let me move around so I could see videos and diagrams. From
what I understand, my requests actually made the jury examine the evidence
more carefully on the case. They felt my requests made them better jurors.
Of course, the guy we convicted looked at me like he wanted to do really bad
things to me when I asked for stuff, but I didn't care. I know he's in
prison now and I hope he has a really mean boyfriend named Bubba. Anyway, my
point is that having a visual impairment doesn't make any difference in
sitting on a jury except for maybe causing a more careful examination of
evidence. So, that's my two cents. 

Angela K. Long
PRESIDENT

A CERTIFIED 8(A) PROGRAM PARTICIPANT 
Phone: 303-339-2048
Fax: 303-339-2055
13341 CLAYTON ST.
THORNTON CO 80241
angela at sextanttech.net



-----Original Message-----
From: colorado-talk-bounces at nfbnet.org
[mailto:colorado-talk-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of Chris Foster
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2008 9:50 AM
To: NFB of Colorado Discussion List; Colorado Association of Blind Students
Mailing list
Subject: [Colorado-talk] question as to whether a legally blind jurortainted
a criminal trial

Hello Listers,
I would invite you to read the below article out of Grand Junction.
While there are a lot of missing pieces to the puzzle, this article may,
yet again, call in to question how we as blind people serve on jurries.
Of course, we know that we can and should serve.  However, a defense
team is working to use a juror's blindness to upset an entire trial.
I'll look forward to everyone's thoughts and opinions.  Chris Foster 
 
 


 <http://www.gjfreepress.com/assets/pdf/GJ590811214.PDF> Blagg Motion
for New Trial
GRAND JUNCTION, Colo. - Attorneys early next year will take up the
question of whether a legally blind juror tainted Michael Blagg's 2004
murder conviction.

In a telephone conference Friday morning with Chief Judge David Bottger,
parties agreed to meet again Feb. 17 to schedule a hearing date.

Assistant Mesa County District Attorney Rich Tuttle will handle the
issue for the District Attorney's Office. Blagg will be represented by
Brian Conners and Tina Fang, both state public defenders.

Former public defenders David Eisner and Ken Singer in 2005 sought a new
trial for Blagg, claiming Marilyn Charlesworth of Orchard Mesa failed to
disclose her disability during jury selection.

The Colorado Court of Appeals in 2005 said the issue couldn't be
examined until the appeal process for Blagg's jury trial conviction was
settled.

The Colorado Supreme Court in September essentially ended that appeal
process, declining to hear the case.

Blagg, 45, is serving life without parole for shooting and killing his
wife, Jennifer, at his family's home in the Redlands in November 2001.
Their daughter, Abby, was never found and is presumed dead.

According to the 2005 motion from Eisner and Singer, Charlesworth
allegedly told other jurors on the Blagg panel that she was legally
blind. 

"She couldn't see a lot of the stuff that they presented, like the
pictures, and that stuff, that were shown, she couldn't see those unless
they were right in front of her."

The motion said an investigator with the public defender's office
interviewed Shirley Kreutzer, a court bailiff during Blagg's trial, who
claimed Charlesworth at one point asked her if she could move from the
back row to the front in the jury box where she could see better.

Kreutzer reportedly asked Charlesworth if she'd made her vision problems
known.

"... Ms. Charlesworth stated that she didn't consider the fact that she
was legally blind to be a handicap," the motion said.

Reach Paul Shockley at  <mailto:pshockley at gjfreepress.com>
pshockley at gjfreepress.com 


_______________________________________________
Colorado-talk mailing list
Colorado-talk at nfbnet.org
http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/colorado-talk_nfbnet.org
To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
Colorado-talk:
http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/colorado-talk_nfbnet.org/angela%40sext
anttech.net