[Blindtlk] technological toilet, this is for real!

[Kirk Harmon]

Well said!
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Steve" <stevep.deeley at insightbb.com>
To: "'NFBnet Blind Talk Mailing List'" <blindtlk at nfbnet.org>
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 9:17 PM
Subject: Re: [Blindtlk] technological toilet, this is for real!


>I think it is time to flush this particular topic!!
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: blindtlk-bounces at nfbnet.org [mailto:blindtlk-bounces at nfbnet.org]
> On Behalf Of Kathy Davis
> Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 8:25 AM
> To: NFBnet Blind Talk Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [Blindtlk] technological toilet, this is for real!
> 
> 
> Well, I'll say one thing...I would imagine that Dr. Maurer will
> incorporate this topic in his 2008 banquet speech.
> 
> Kathy
> 
> Kathy Davis, Counselor, LMHC
> Senior Professor
> Daytona Beach Community College
> 386-506-3369
> davisk at dbcc.edu
> 
>>>> "T. Joseph Carter" <tjosephcarter at gmail.com> Saturday, January 12, 
>>>> 2008 5:53 PM >>>
> X-nfbnet.org-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more
> information
> 
> And who determined that four squares of TP are sufficient, and in three
> installments anyway?  *laugh*
> 
> Joseph
> 
> On Sat, Jan 12, 2008 at 02:58:32PM -0500, Kirk Harmon wrote:
>> However Mike, the question is, after touching ourselves, do we then 
>> touch
>> the buttons or after? LOL!
>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> From: "Mike Freeman" <k7uij at panix.com>
>> To: "NFBnet Blind Talk Mailing List" <blindtlk at nfbnet.org>
>> Sent: Saturday, January 12, 2008 1:48 PM
>> Subject: Re: [Blindtlk] technological toilet, this is for real!
>> 
>> 
>> > Waaaaait a minute here. Let's curb our indignation for a moment and 
>> > use our noodles. What is one of the greatest complaints many 
>> > (especially
>> > females) have about public restrooms? Lack of cleanliness. So
> everything
>> > is disinfected (whether this really works is, perhaps, another
> story).
>> > And we don't want people touching anything (except, of course,
>> > ourselves) so there's an incentive to have pushbuttons. And
> automatic
>> > doors are a consequence of those with mobility impairments asking
> for
>> > accessibility. Yes, the thing will probably be a pain for us, the
> blind.
>> > And yes, it probably costs more than it ought. But there *is*
>> > rationality behind many of the features.
> _______________________________________________
> blindtlk mailing list
> blindtlk at nfbnet.org 
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindtlk
> 
> _______________________________________________
> blindtlk mailing list
> blindtlk at nfbnet.org http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindtlk
> 
> 
> -- 
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
> Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.2/1223 - Release Date:
> 1/13/2008 8:23 PM
> _______________________________________________
> blindtlk mailing list
> blindtlk at nfbnet.org
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindtlk
>