[blindlaw] FMLA and Blind Rehab

[Mazen]

knowing nothing about the FMLA, it seems like giving paid leave for at least
part of the  time for getting mobility training is a reasonable
accommodation whether or not there was a medical necessity. My employer has
agreed to give me one week of paid leave for such training provided that I
am able to meet my hours expectations notwithstanding the leave. 

Requiring unpaid leave or the use of vacation time appears to me to be
punishing the employee for their choice of  mobility. I'm curious if there's
any caselaw on the subject?

M~

Mazen M. Basrawi
Bingham McCutchen LLP 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Ford, Tim (DHS-OLS) [mailto:TFord at dhs.ca.gov] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2007 8:05 AM
To: NFBnet Blind Law Mailing List
Subject: Re: [blindlaw] FMLA and Blind Rehab

I think it would be a real stretch of FMLA to allow leave for this.  The
other approach might be some sort of reasonable accommodation concept, but
since this is not caused by any change in the person's medical condition,
but apparently strictly a life style choice, I do not see that as a viable
approach.  Perhaps vacation time is the only option.  I am house counsel for
my state agency's Office of Civil Rights, and I frankly admit that if this
scenario came to me, I would deny use of anything but vacation leave, and if
the person did not have enough time on the books, then they would have to
take it as unpaid leave.


-----Original Message-----
From: blindlaw-bounces at nfbnet.org [mailto:blindlaw-bounces at nfbnet.org]
On Behalf Of Craig Borne
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2007 6:18 AM
To: NFBnet Blind Law Mailing List
Subject: [blindlaw] FMLA and Blind Rehab

Has anyone encountered this situation:
Employee is blind and has been for the past 10 years.  Employee functions
very well in work place.  Employee has been a white cane user for those 10
years, but now would like to use a guide dog.
Guide dog programs are typically about 28 days for first time participants.
Office HR believes that employee will need to take "leave without pay" for
the 28 day period because guide dog training is not "medically necessary."
Any thoughts on how a preference in mobility aids would have this scenario
fall under FMLA?
Thank you,
Craig

Craig Borne, Esq.
Manager, ADA and Title VI Compliance
Office of ADA, Regulations, Risk Management, and Special Projects
(OARRS)
 
Maryland Department of Transportation
7201 Corporate Center Drive
P.O. Box 548, M.S. 330
Hanover, MD 21076
Phone: 410-865-1378
Fax: 410-865-1113
E-Mail: cborne at mdot.state.md.us
 
*** This communication may contain information that is legally privileged,
confidential or exempt from disclosure. If you are not the intended
recipient, please note that any dissemination, distribution and/or copying
of this communication is strictly prohibited. Anyone who receives this
message in error should notify the sender immediately either by telephone or
by return email and delete it from his/her computer.  Thank you.  
 



The information contained in this communication (including any
attachments) may be confidential and legally privileged.  This email may not
serve as a contractual agreement unless explicit written agreement for this
purpose has been made. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby
notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this
communication or any of its contents is strictly prohibited.  If you have
received this communication in error, please re-send this communication to
the sender indicating that it was received in error and delete the original
message and any copy of it from your computer system.

_______________________________________________
blindlaw mailing list
blindlaw at nfbnet.org
http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw