[blindlaw] bulk scanners

albert griffith albertpgriffith at hotmail.com
Tue Apr 24 21:56:11 CDT 2007


Since the K1000 program uses Abby as one of its OCR. packages, how could
this be accurate?  It also uses Scansoft's OCR. program so you have choices.
I'm not blindly loyal to the folks at Kurzweil  but it seems the word
processing, format conversion, and note taking features would make it a more
blind user friendly package.   

-----Original Message-----
From: blindlaw-bounces at nfbnet.org [mailto:blindlaw-bounces at nfbnet.org] On
Behalf Of Sarah Clark
Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2007 9:56 PM
To: NFBnet Blind Law Mailing List
Subject: Re: [blindlaw] bulk scanners

Well it would depend on how accurate you'd like your scanning and how much
work you'd be willing to do to fix the errors.
We have compared Abbyy, Kursweil and OmniPage on the same book (on numerous
occasions), giving each of them a chance individually to recognize the same
text.  Abbyy did a much better job, with far fewer errors than any of the
others.  OmniPage is a good program too, but in our experience Abby has
consistently performed better.

Sarah


----- Original Message -----
From: "albert griffith" <albertpgriffith at hotmail.com>
To: "'NFBnet Blind Law Mailing List'" <blindlaw at nfbnet.org>
Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2007 5:13 PM
Subject: Re: [blindlaw] bulk scanners


>I think if I had allot of scanning to do, I'd purchase one of the OCR.
> programs designed for the blind.  I prefer Kurzweil's but Freedom 
> Scientific
> has one as well.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: blindlaw-bounces at nfbnet.org [mailto:blindlaw-bounces at nfbnet.org] On
> Behalf Of Locke Milholland
> Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2007 5:39 PM
> To: NFBnet Blind Law Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [blindlaw] bulk scanners
>
> Does the ABBYY  fine reader software require extra Jaws scripting, or is 
> it
> user friendly as is?
>
> Locke
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Dennis Clark" <dennisgclark at sbcglobal.net>
> To: "NFBnet Blind Law Mailing List" <blindlaw at nfbnet.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2007 4:27 PM
> Subject: Re: [blindlaw] bulk scanners
>
>
>> Hi Joe,
>> You've got it.  The pages in the document feeder have both sides scanned
>> at
>> once.  This is of course user selectable, so if your document has 
>> printing
>> on only one side, you would make that selection.  My practice is to have
>> the
>> binder cut off my books at Kinko's, and then scan them using the document
>> feeder in duplex mode.  I then use ABBYY Finereader to perform OCR on the
>> images.  You can then save the document in RTF format.  The RTF document
>> can
>> then be read with Kurzweil or Word.
>> All the best,
>> Dennis
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> From: "Joe Orozco" <jsorozco at gmail.com>
>> To: "NFBnet Blind Law Mailing List" <blindlaw at nfbnet.org>
>> Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2007 10:02 AM
>> Subject: Re: [blindlaw] bulk scanners
>>
>>
>>>    My ignorance is going to show prominently, but can someone describe
>>> the
>>> characteristics of a duplex scanner?  Currently, I have a Cannon flatbed
>>> LiDe something or other.  I scan pages one at a time, rather slow, but
>>> this
>>> duplex business leads me to believe the scanner can feed paper through
>>> and
>>> scan both sides?  Thanks in advance for the clarification.
>>>
>>>          Joe
>>>
>>> "Life is a compromise of what your ego wants to do, what experience 
>>> tells
>>> you to do, and what nerves let you do."--Bruce Crampton
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>>> From: "Dennis Clark" <dennisgclark at sbcglobal.net>
>>> To: "NFBnet Blind Law Mailing List" <blindlaw at nfbnet.org>
>>> Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2007 12:43 PM
>>> Subject: Re: [blindlaw] bulk scanners
>>>
>>>
>>>> Hi Robert,
>>>> The Fujitsu's do work with Kurzweil.  I agree with your observation 
>>>> that
>>>> first scanning one side of a batch and then flipping the stack to scan
>>>> the
>>>> other side creates many problems:  most notably that if 2 pages
>>>> accidentally
>>>> feed through, the entire batch is corrupted.  I have wasted many hours
>>>> with
>>>> that process.  It was this frustration that originally caused me to buy
>>>> a
>>>> Fujitsu duplex scanner.
>>>> All the best,
>>>> Dennis
>>>>
>>>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>>>> From: "Robert Jaquiss" <rjaquiss at earthlink.net>
>>>> To: "NFBnet Blind Law Mailing List" <blindlaw at nfbnet.org>
>>>> Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2007 9:31 AM
>>>> Subject: Re: [blindlaw] bulk scanners
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Hello:
>>>>>
>>>>>     I have used both a Fujitsu FI4010 and a Canon DR2580C. The Canon 
>>>>> is
>>>>> small and can have a flatbed option added to it. When looking for a
>>>>> scanner,
>>>>> I would look at the Kurzweil or OpenBook sites for a list of scanners
>>>>> that
>>>>> have been tested. I sure do like the ability of a scanner to do duplex
>>>>> scanning. If your pages get messed in a simplex scanner, you will have
>>>>> a
>>>>> real mess when you flip the stack over.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>
>>>>> Robert Jaquiss
>>>>>
>>>>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>>>>> From: "Deborah Byrne" <deborahbyrne at earthlink.net>
>>>>> To: "Blindlaw" <blindlaw at nfbnet.org>
>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2007 9:46 AM
>>>>> Subject: [blindlaw] bulk scanners
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Hello all,
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm getting ready to start law school and I'm planning to request a
>>>>> bulk
>>>>> scanner.  I'm wondering if any of you have advice on which bulk
>>>>> scanners
>>>>> you
>>>>> do or do not recommend and for what reasons?
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Deborah Byrne
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> blindlaw mailing list
>>>>>> blindlaw at nfbnet.org
>>>>>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> blindlaw mailing list
>>>>> blindlaw at nfbnet.org
>>>>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> blindlaw mailing list
>>>> blindlaw at nfbnet.org
>>>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> blindlaw mailing list
>>> blindlaw at nfbnet.org
>>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> blindlaw mailing list
>> blindlaw at nfbnet.org
>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> blindlaw mailing list
> blindlaw at nfbnet.org
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw
>
> _______________________________________________
> blindlaw mailing list
> blindlaw at nfbnet.org
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw 

_______________________________________________
blindlaw mailing list
blindlaw at nfbnet.org
http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw



More information about the blindlaw mailing list