[blindlaw] Unsubscribe
Dan Matzkin
dmatzkin at wesleyan.edu
Mon Sep 18 16:10:51 CDT 2006
To unsubscribe from this group you must first purchase a Craft-O-Matic
Adjustable Subscription Cancellation Unit. The unit can be obtained from
most hardware stores and dental clinics. Be sure to obtain the proper
permits to operate the unit from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the
Food and Drug Administration in Washington D.C. USA.
Be sure to unpack the kit carefully and place each component in its
accompanying mesh safety bag. Mount the Pershing DF4 mesinator on top of
the perforated Gerring Mach 77 refibulator and attach them using the
eight-millimeter torque fork. Be sure that the refibulator is mounted at a
66-degree angle and properly dispersed so that it is flush with the curved
section of the Pyrex thistle tube. Place the four sections of the
triangular separation gear into the posture cylinder and lock them into
place using the band-aid adhesive strip. Insert the wiggling pin into the
wobbling hole, making sure that it seated correctly. Place the D cell
battery and the eleven 9 volt batteries in the power chamber.
The device should be calibrated before operation using the optional
digital corkscrew accessory pack prior to operation. Insert the digital
corkscrew through the electronic combustion service chamber using caution
not to touch the reinforced tungsten igniter control module and quickly
turn the inverter drive to 28.6 degrees. Turn the Craft-O-Matic Adjustable
Subscription Cancellation Unit upside down and hit the bottom plate with a
48-ounce ball-peen hammer while shaking the unit vigorously. Force open
the door to the incineration valve compartment and set the pressure gauge
to 719 psi. Close the door and seal it shut with duct tape. The unit
should now be properly calibrated and ready to use.
Before activating the Craft-O-Matic Adjustable Subscription Cancellation
Unit, you must first elevate it to a height of 229 feet above sea level to
insure that the unit receives the proper oxygen level and barometric
pressure. Point the aerial to 17 degrees north by northeast to within the
parameters of the Telstar GS-2 weather satellite and apply pressure to the
wing shaft on the southern most section of the modular accelerator. Using
the special ratchet adapter supplied with the unit, rotate the heater core
to the "on" position. The "on" position has been obtained when the green
light begins to flash, signifying that the red light is about to go off.
Once the red light is off, flip the toggle switch labeled "ON/OFF" to the
"ON" position and count to 47 before logging on to the system.
Logon using your username and password and wait for the prompt. Once
prompted you must check the box with the appropriate action you wish to
take and then press the pressure release button and turn off the
compressor while turning the hand crank at 231 meters per minute. Next,
press control, alt, delete, caps lock, shift, number lock, escape and tab
simultaneously. Press enter.
You will have one second to complete the procedure. If you fail to respond
in the time limit allowed, simply purchase a new Craft-O-Matic Adjustable
Subscription Cancellation Unit and start from the beginning.
Please remember that this is the only way we will accept for you to
unsubscribe from this group. We have made every attempt to simplify the
procedure for your convenience. Failure to comply with the unsubscribe
policy will result in immediate termination of your subscription so please
follow the above directions closely.
Hope that helps!
Dan
>
Just for the record, you can unsubscribe at
>
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw
>
> Search on that page for the word "unsubscribe" and you will find the link.
> You will need your password.
>
> You can also send a message to
>
> blindlaw-request at nfbnet.org
>
> with the line
>
> unsubscribe password
>
> supplying your list password.
>
> I'll unsubscribe you but will not be able to do it immediately.
>
> On Mon, 18 Sep 2006 18:44:10 +0000, braem at comcast.net wrote:
>
>>Please unsubscribe me immediately. I couldn't find a link to do this.
>> Thanks.
>
>>--
>>Michael Braem
>>braem at comcast.net
>
>>CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This electronic mail transmission has been sent
>> by an attorney. It may contain information that is confidential,
>> privileged, proprietary,
> or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure. If
>>you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you are
>> not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or disseminate this message,
>> any part of it, or any
> attachments. If you have received this message in error, please delete
> this message and any attachments from your system without reading the
> content and notify
> the sender immediately of the
>>inadvertent transmission. There is no intent on the part of the sender to
>> waive any privilege, including the attorney-client privilege, that may
>> attach to this
> communication. Thank you for your cooperation.
>
>>-------------- Forwarded Message: --------------
>>From: "Elizabeth Akinola" <elizabetha at ecnv.org>
>>To: "NFBnet Blind Law Mailing List" <blindlaw at nfbnet.org>
>>Subject: Re: [blindlaw] Please Assist ASAP
>>Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 18:43:14 +0000
>>> As Craig pointed, this issue cannot be covered under Title I of the ADA
>>> since the question is about clients not employees. If it falls
>>> anywhere,
>>> it'd be under Title III--public accommodations.
>>>
>>> Like hospitals and shopping centers, a lawyer's office offers services
>>> to
>>> the general public, and is therefore a place of public accommodation.
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Mazen Basrawi" <mbasrawi at exchange.dralegal.org>
>>> To: "NFBnet Blind Law Mailing List" <blindlaw at nfbnet.org>
>>> Sent: Monday, September 18, 2006 12:12 PM
>>> Subject: Re: [blindlaw] Please Assist ASAP
>>>
>>>
>>> > Actually, this issue is covered under Title I of the ADA covering
>>> > employment, not Title III which covers public accommodations.
>>> >
>>> > M~
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Mazen M. Basrawi
>>> > Equal Justice Works/Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein Fellow
>>> > Disability Rights Advocates
>>> > 2001 Center Street, Third Floor
>>> > Berkeley, California 94704-1204
>>> > Tel: (510) 665-8644
>>> > Fax: (510) 665-8511
>>> > TTY: (510) 665-8716
>>> >
>>> > STATEMENT OF CONFIDENTIALITY
>>> > The contents of this e-mail message and any attachments are
>>> confidential
>>> > and are intended solely for the addressee. This information may also
>>> be
>>> > legally privileged. This transmission is sent in trust, for the sole
>>> > purpose of delivery to the intended recipient. If you have received
>>> this
>>> > transmission in error, any use, reproduction or dissemination of this
>>> > transmission is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
>>> > recipient, please immediately notify the sender by reply e-mail or at
>>> > (510) 665-8644 or (510) 665-8716 (TTY) and delete the message and its
>>> > attachments, if any.
>>> >
>>> > -----Original Message-----
>>> > From: braem at comcast.net [mailto:braem at comcast.net]
>>> > Sent: Saturday, September 16, 2006 5:12 PM
>>> > To: NFBnet Blind Law Mailing List
>>> > Subject: Re: [blindlaw] Please Assist ASAP
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > All I'm trying to find are cases - federal or state - to use as
>>> examples
>>> > about whether a complaint has ever been filed against a law firm by a
>>> > blind client. One hypo could be this: blind client needs a contract
>>> > drafted. Law firm does not have any reader equipment or way to
>>> convert
>>> > the docs to braille, nor does it feel the need to accommodate the
>>> client
>>> > by providing a an actual reader, etc. etc. I know that a law firm or
>>> > office is considered a "public accommodation" under the ADA, so I
>>> would
>>> > think the attorney/law firm would have to accommodate the client in
>>> one
>>> > way or another.
>>> >
>>> > That's all I'm looking for, don't know how I can make it simpler than
>>> > that. I suppose the applicable law should be the ADA. And I'm
>>> simply
>>> > trying to gather information for an article I'm drafting for a local
>>> bar
>>> > association (I am a licensed and practicing attorney).
>>> >
>>> > If you have any cases, settlement agreements, or law articles
>>> revolving
>>> > around this subject matter, please let me know at braem at comcast.net.
>>> > Thanks.
>>> >
>>> > Michael
>>> >
>>> > -------------- Original message --------------
>>> > From: "Dennis Clark" <dennisgclark at sbcglobal.net>
>>> >
>>> >> Hello,
>>> >> I am still trying to understand the issue at hand. Specifically what
>>> >> accommodation is needed and not provided? Secondly, what statute do
>>> we
>>> >
>>> >> think imposed a duty on the law firm to provide the particular
>>> > accommodation
>>> >> requested? I am not saying there isn't such a statute, I simply need
>>> > to
>>> >> know if it is the ADA or some other state statute. Also, it would be
>>> >> helpful if posters would sign their emails. I think that 2 earlier
>>> > posts on
>>> >> this topic were from the same person, but from two different email
>>> >> addresses. With respect to the first post on the topic, is this an
>>> > attorney
>>> >> requesting assistance from other attorneys, or is it a non attorney
>>> > trying
>>> >> to obtain legal guidance? Either is fine, but it helps to understand
>>> > the
>>> >> poster's position in order to properly address the question.
>>> >> Regards,
>>> >> Dennis
>>> >>
>>> >> ----- Original Message -----
>>> >> From: "Locke Milholland"
>>> >> To: "NFBnet Blind Law Mailing List"
>>> >> Sent: Saturday, September 16, 2006 1:29 PM
>>> >> Subject: Re: [blindlaw] Please Assist ASAP
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> >I would look for an ethics opinion under the rule providing that
>>> >> >attorneys
>>> >> > maintain communications with clients.Outside the professional
>>> > setting, the
>>> >> > legal theory would fall under the same legal actions such as the
>>> > claim
>>> >> > against Target for failing to provide accessible website
>>> > information.
>>> >> >
>>> >> >
>>> >> >> Can you tell us more about the accommodations that were needed?
>>> >> >> Also,
>>> >> >> what
>>> >> >> is the legal theory that would give the law firm this duty?
>>> >> >> Thanks,
>>> >> >>>(Original question). I'm looking for any cases/news articles in
>>> >> >>>which an
>>> >> >>>attorney or law
>>> >> >>>firm was sued by a client or potential client who was blind,
>>> > because the
>>> >> >>>firm failed to accommodate the client. Please let me know of
>>> > anything by
>>> >> >>>e-mailing me at...
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Michael
>>> >> >
>>> >> > _______________________________________________
>>> >> > blindlaw mailing list
>>> >> > blindlaw at nfbnet.org
>>> >> > http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw
>>> >> >
>>> >>
>>> >> _______________________________________________
>>> >> blindlaw mailing list
>>> >> blindlaw at nfbnet.org
>>> >> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > blindlaw mailing list
>>> > blindlaw at nfbnet.org
>>> > http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> blindlaw mailing list
>>> blindlaw at nfbnet.org
>>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw
>
>
>>_______________________________________________
>>blindlaw mailing list
>>blindlaw at nfbnet.org
>>http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> blindlaw mailing list
> blindlaw at nfbnet.org
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw
>
More information about the blindlaw
mailing list