[blindlaw] Please Assist ASAP

[Craig Borne]

How would this fall under Title I -- Employment -- if the party not
receiving an accommodation is simply a "client" and not an "employee?"
Craig 


Craig Borne, Esq.
Director, Office of Federal/State Compliance
Maryland Department of Transportation
7201 Corporate Center Drive
P.O. Box 548, M.S. 330
Hanover, MD 21076
Phone: 410-865-1378
Fax: 410-865-1113
E-Mail: cborne at mdot.state.md.us
 
*** This communication may contain information that is legally
privileged, confidential or exempt from disclosure. If you are not the
intended recipient, please note that any dissemination, distribution
and/or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. Anyone who
receives this message in error should notify the sender immediately
either by telephone or by return email and delete it from his/her
computer.  Thank you.  
 

-----Original Message-----
From: blindlaw-bounces at nfbnet.org [mailto:blindlaw-bounces at nfbnet.org]
On Behalf Of Mazen Basrawi
Sent: Monday, September 18, 2006 1:13 PM
To: NFBnet Blind Law Mailing List
Subject: Re: [blindlaw] Please Assist ASAP

Actually, this issue is covered under Title I of the ADA covering
employment, not Title III which covers public accommodations.

M~



Mazen M. Basrawi
Equal Justice Works/Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein Fellow Disability
Rights Advocates
2001 Center Street, Third Floor
Berkeley, California  94704-1204
Tel: (510) 665-8644
Fax: (510) 665-8511
TTY: (510) 665-8716

STATEMENT OF CONFIDENTIALITY
The contents of this e-mail message and any attachments are confidential
and are intended solely for the addressee. This information may also be
legally privileged. This transmission is sent in trust, for the sole
purpose of delivery to the intended recipient. If you have received this
transmission in error, any use, reproduction or dissemination of this
transmission is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please immediately notify the sender by reply e-mail or at
(510) 665-8644 or (510) 665-8716 (TTY) and delete the message and its
attachments, if any. 

-----Original Message-----
From: braem at comcast.net [mailto:braem at comcast.net]
Sent: Saturday, September 16, 2006 5:12 PM
To: NFBnet Blind Law Mailing List
Subject: Re: [blindlaw] Please Assist ASAP


All I'm trying to find are cases - federal or state - to use as examples
about whether a complaint has ever been filed against a law firm by a
blind client.  One hypo could be this:  blind client needs a contract
drafted.  Law firm does  not have any reader equipment or way to convert
the docs to braille, nor does it feel the need to accommodate the client
by providing a an actual reader, etc. etc.  I know that a law firm or
office is considered a "public accommodation" under the ADA, so I would
think the attorney/law firm would have to accommodate the client in one
way or another.  

That's all I'm looking for, don't know how I can make it simpler than
that.  I suppose the applicable law should be the ADA.  And I'm simply
trying to gather information for an article I'm drafting for a local bar
association (I am a licensed and practicing attorney).  

If you have any cases, settlement agreements, or law articles revolving
around this subject matter, please let me know at braem at comcast.net.
Thanks. 

Michael

-------------- Original message -------------- 
From: "Dennis Clark" <dennisgclark at sbcglobal.net> 

> Hello,
> I am still trying to understand the issue at hand. Specifically what 
> accommodation is needed and not provided? Secondly, what statute do we

> think imposed a duty on the law firm to provide the particular
accommodation 
> requested? I am not saying there isn't such a statute, I simply need
to 
> know if it is the ADA or some other state statute. Also, it would be 
> helpful if posters would sign their emails. I think that 2 earlier
posts on 
> this topic were from the same person, but from two different email 
> addresses. With respect to the first post on the topic, is this an
attorney 
> requesting assistance from other attorneys, or is it a non attorney
trying 
> to obtain legal guidance? Either is fine, but it helps to understand
the 
> poster's position in order to properly address the question. 
> Regards, 
> Dennis 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Locke Milholland" 
> To: "NFBnet Blind Law Mailing List" 
> Sent: Saturday, September 16, 2006 1:29 PM 
> Subject: Re: [blindlaw] Please Assist ASAP 
> 
> 
> >I would look for an ethics opinion under the rule providing that 
> >attorneys
> > maintain communications with clients.Outside the professional
setting, the 
> > legal theory would fall under the same legal actions such as the
claim 
> > against Target for failing to provide accessible website
information. 
> > 
> > 
> >> Can you tell us more about the accommodations that were needed? 
> >> Also,
> >> what 
> >> is the legal theory that would give the law firm this duty? 
> >> Thanks, 
> >>>(Original question). I'm looking for any cases/news articles in 
> >>>which an
> >>>attorney or law 
> >>>firm was sued by a client or potential client who was blind,
because the 
> >>>firm failed to accommodate the client. Please let me know of
anything by 
> >>>e-mailing me at... 
> > 
> > Michael
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > blindlaw mailing list 
> > blindlaw at nfbnet.org 
> > http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw 
> > 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> blindlaw mailing list 
> blindlaw at nfbnet.org 
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw 
_______________________________________________
blindlaw mailing list
blindlaw at nfbnet.org
http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw