[blindlaw] Electronic Rulebooks

[Rod Alcidonis]

So, John, determining which one is better, I think, is  a personal choice,
right?  I gathered from your post that  the FRCP on the Cornell site seems
to have somewhat of an advantage over the book, is that right? You mentioned
that the comments were useful to you.

I am trying to figure-out whether I should get the book, or not.  If I can
get the same information on the Cornell site, I don't see the reason to get
the book.

Rod
----- Original Messag
Rod e -----
From: "John Ramsey" <stephnjohnny211 at alltel.net>
To: "'NFBnet Blind Law Mailing List'" <blindlaw at nfbnet.org>
Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2006 2:11 PM
Subject: Re: [blindlaw] Electronic Rulebooks


Hello Rod,

I too have used the Cornell website and as I recall, the only issue was with
some of the rule books not having the accompanying commentary. I have made a
lot of use of the comments-especially when many of my professors get exam
scenarios from the vagaries contained in the comments to the various rules.

Take care,

John




----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----


> _______________________________________________
> blindlaw mailing list
> blindlaw at nfbnet.org
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw
>