[blindlaw] LSAT accomodations

[Angie Matney]

I think Rod has a point. I didn't bother writing an adendum because, while I wanted my score to be a bit higher, it was a 
good enough score that I didn't think I should apologize for it. See how the testing process goes and then decide if you 
need to explain your score. I did mention blindness in my personal statements.

Angie

On Sun, 23 Jul 2006 06:35:56 -0400, Rod Alcidonis wrote:

>Obtaining extra time to complete the exam is not as bad as it may sounds,
>though. I would advise you to write an addendum about it, only if you feel
>that your performance was hampered by the types of accommodations you
>received. However, if you manage to obtain a competitive score on the exam,
>I wouldn't bother with initiating this process.

>Rod

>----- Original Message -----
>From: <cw413 at comcast.net>
>To: <blindlaw at nfbnet.org>
>Sent: Saturday, July 22, 2006 11:08 PM
>Subject: [blindlaw] LSAT accomodations


>> I am new to the list- I have reviewed the previous posts regarding LSAT
>accomodations.  I am preparing to take the test for the second time.  Can
>anyone advise if they used a tactile drawing kit for the logic games
>portion?  If so, was it commercially made?  Also, any comments on the LSAC's
>Authorization to Release Info Form when requesting additional time?  I did
>not request additional time for the first test, and it reflected in my
>scores.  Should I disregard the Release form and do my own explaining and
>documentation when I apply to law school again?  Thanks in advance.
>> CW
>> _______________________________________________
>> blindlaw mailing list
>> blindlaw at nfbnet.org
>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw

>_______________________________________________
>blindlaw mailing list
>blindlaw at nfbnet.org
>http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw



>-- 
>No virus found in this incoming message.
>Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.10.3/395 - Release Date: 7/21/2006