[blindlaw] Fwd: Casino access to gaming casino games and restrooms =- Need to fight!
David Andrews
dandrews at visi.com
Wed Dec 27 12:04:58 CST 2006
I can understand someone wanting equal access to all the games in a
casino. I do see some complications ... but ... First some casinos
are on native american tribal lands and are governed by some other
rules and lawa, I believe. Don't know if they are covered by the
ADA. They may be, I just don't know. Secondly, even if they are, a
place of public accommodation I don't think would be required to make
"fundamental" changes to a game.
As to the bathroom thing, this is a blindness issue to me, not an
accommodation one. first, anyone who was at all compatent with using
his/her cane or guide dog should be able to navigate in a rest
room. Secondly, rest rooms have stuff down each side generally,
sinks, urinals, toilet stalls, hand drying machines, towel
dispensers, changing tables etc. Where would you put railings, and
what good would they do. I don't mean to make light of something
that is obviously important to you but this is a solution that isn't
used or needed by blind people.
Dave
At 11:49 PM 12/26/2006, you wrote:
>Begin forwarded message:
>
>>From: Dennis DiBona <dibona at mac.com>
>>Date: December 27, 2006 12:48:10 AM EST
>>To: blindlaw at nfbnet.org, blindlaw at nfbnet.org
>>Subject: Re: Casino access to gaming casino games and restrooms =-
>>Need to fight!
>>
>>It is interesting to hear the responses to the issues of equal
>>access for the blind when it comes to how owners of casinos should
>>be made to provide the same access to ALL the casino games, not
>>just machine games, and level the playing field to accomodate the
>>disabled , in this case the blind and low vision population.
>>The issue to something that universally will be recognized as a
>>guide to assist the blind in any resteroom so those of us who are
>>blind or with low vison can retain our right to use the restoom
>>with digntity and as independently as possible.
>> The first issue seems to indicate that a LAWYER take this on and
>>fight to establish specific language within the ADA law to provide
>>the most opportunity possible to blind/low vision people so they
>>are able to enjoy the same Casino Gaming opportunities as sighted
>>folks. The casinos I have been in certainly make enough money off
>>the blind and low vision players not to mention all the sighted
>>and any others handicapped or not!!! They can easily fix this
>>inequality. To me, it is a matter of taking away my right to
>>engage in any and all activities I choose to , just as sighted
>>people are able to become involved in, no matter what it is.
>> A brilliant pro bono lawyer is needed to make this a reality for
>>our population. I was trying to contact Ellis Rubin, but alas he
>>passed aaway recently and now where do we go? he was the champion
>>of the underdog. Who will rise to the occassion now?
>>His spirit must live on? Any takers out there?? I am interested in
>>knowing. I would be part of any class action if it is not any cost
>>to me as I have so little.
>> But the need for the fight is clear. I see no reason why this
>>case nor the restroom one below, could lose!
>> The law needs to be specific to make casinos accommodate so the
>>blind/low vision persons have access and can play any game in any
>>casino.
>> The second (restroom access) issue is a similar one needing a
>>lawyer to fight for our rights. In this case,it involves a more
>>sensitive issue: that of our human right to take care of our
>>biological needs and remain sanitary in the process.
>> (Yes, it is "nice" to know there are some places where security
>>personnel or staff are in restrooms and do assist. I find that to
>>be a rarity.It is inconsistent. It should not be left to chance.
>> The law must be fair to each person equally in all "access"
>>areas. Blind/low vision included.
>> As I "see" it, this would not be so far fetched: casino
>>restrooms, and any others in public or company buildings, install a
>>standard touch bar rail starting at the restroom door and leading
>>one to the actual commode, sink, towel rack or hand dryer, and
>>back out again. A speaking directional telling us where we are and
>>where we need to turn,go, etc is also needed.
>>Hope someone out there picks up on the legalities here and goes for
>>it! What do you all thinmk?
>>On Dec 26, 2006, at 1:00 PM, blindlaw-request at nfbnet.org wrote:
>>
>>>Send blindlaw mailing list submissions to
>>> blindlaw at nfbnet.org
>>>
>>>To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw
>>>or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>>> blindlaw-request at nfbnet.org
>>>
>>>You can reach the person managing the list at
>>> blindlaw-owner at nfbnet.org
>>>
>>>When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>>>than "Re: Contents of blindlaw digest..."
>>>
>>>
>>>Today's Topics:
>>>
>>> 1. Re: (no subject) (Rumpole)
>>> 2. Re: (no subject) (Stephanie Ortoleva)
>>> 3. Re: (no subject) (Ross Doerr)
>>> 4. Re: (no subject) (Mark BurningHawk)
>>>
>>>
>>>--------------------------------------------------------------------- -
>>>
>>>Message: 1
>>>Date: Mon, 25 Dec 2006 13:43:49 -0500
>>>From: "Rumpole" <Rumpole at gwi.net>
>>>Subject: Re: [blindlaw] (no subject)
>>>To: "NFBnet Blind Law Mailing List" <blindlaw at nfbnet.org>
>>>Message-ID: <000d01c72854$9e9e8020$b824fea9 at siameserules>
>>>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>>>
>>>Ya know, I'm starting to worry about a few folks here.
>>>
>>>
>>>----- Original Message -----
>>>From: "Stephanie Ortoleva" <womankind at earthlink.net>
>>>To: "NFBnet Blind Law Mailing List" <blindlaw at nfbnet.org>
>>>Sent: Friday, December 22, 2006 10:04 AM
>>>Subject: Re: [blindlaw] (no subject)
>>>
>>>
>>>>Or a male one!
>>>>
>>>>At 08:58 PM 12/21/2006, you wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>The female assistant could whisper in your ear!!
>>>>>Steve
>>>>>----- Original Message -----
>>>>>From: "Russell J. Thomas" <rjtlawfirm at yahoo.com>
>>>>>To: "'NFBnet Blind Law Mailing List'" <blindlaw at nfbnet.org>
>>>>>Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2006 10:57 AM
>>>>>Subject: Re: [blindlaw] (no subject)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>Some years ago, I read an article about an experimental machine
>>>>>>that
>>>would
>>>>>>speak to you when you were playing black jack or other games on a
>>>machine.
>>>>>>However, I have heard nothing about that lately.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>As far as table games are concerned, it might be difficult to
>>>>>>provide
>>>an
>>>>>>assistant. For one thing, it would be difficult to have the
>>>>>>assistant
>>>tel
>>>>>>you what you had in your hand without disclosing your hand to
>>>>>>other
>>>>>>players.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>However, it is quite achievable to provide an assistant to
>>>>>>play on a
>>>>>>machine. I am not aware that this service is offered, although
>>>>>>since
>>>when
>>>>>>I
>>>>>>go to Las Vegas I am always with my wife or friends, I have never
>>>asked.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Mens rooms are a favorite subject with me. I think so much
>>>>>>emphasis
>>>has
>>>>>>been placed on wheelchair accessibility that the blind have been
>>>ignored.
>>>>>>I find restrooms, especially large ones, very challenging. I was
>>>recently
>>>>>>at the Marriottt at Los Angeles Airport and couldn't figure out
>>>>>>where
>>>the
>>>>>>sinks were to wash my hands.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>In many of the big casinos in Las Vegas, there are security
>>>>>>personell
>>>in
>>>>>>the restrooms. These people have offered to help me many times.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>So long as the bathroom is accessible, or barrier free, I know
>>>>>>of no
>>>law
>>>>>>or
>>>>>>regulation that currently requires anything more.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Russ Thomas,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Thomas & Associates
>>>>>>2532 Dupont Drive,
>>>>>>Irvine Ca 92612
>>>>>>T: 949.752.0101
>>>>>>F: 949.257.4756
>>>>>>M: 949.466.7238
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>>>>From: blindlaw-bounces at nfbnet.org [mailto:blindlaw- bounces at nfbnet.org]
>>>On
>>>>>>Behalf Of Dennis DiBona
>>>>>>Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2006 8:59 PM
>>>>>>To: blindlaw at nfbnet.org
>>>>>>Subject: [blindlaw] (no subject)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I am researching the issue of equal access for the low vision/ blind
>>>>>>person wishing to play poker in a casino yet due to the
>>>>>>disability
>>>>>>needing a reader in order to level the playing field so he/she
>>>>>>can
>>>>>>play along with regular players. What does the law provide?
>>>>>>Also , restrooms in all casinos are very different and many are
>>>>>>very
>>>>>>user unfriendly. Are there any regs by law that casino
>>>>>>operators must
>>>>>>have in the restrooms to assist the blind to get in and out
>>>>>>with some
>>>>>>ease?
>>>>>>If not, why not? Even a rail to guide the blind along the walls to
>>>>>>and from the commodes and sinks would at least make it somewhat
>>>>>>easier yet allow for a bit of dignity? What are the heavy duty
>>>>>>laws
>>>>>>on this issue?
>>>>>>Thanks.Dennis
>>>>>>_______________________________________________
>>>>>>blindlaw mailing list
>>>>>>blindlaw at nfbnet.org
>>>>>>http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>_______________________________________________
>>>>>>blindlaw mailing list
>>>>>>blindlaw at nfbnet.org
>>>>>>http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>--
>>>>>>No virus found in this incoming message.
>>>>>>Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>>>>>>Version: 7.1.409 / Virus Database: 268.15.26/597 - Release Date:
>>>>>>12/21/2006
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>--
>>>>>No virus found in this outgoing message.
>>>>>Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>>>>>Version: 7.1.409 / Virus Database: 268.15.26/597 - Release Date:
>>>12/21/2006
>>>>>_______________________________________________
>>>>>blindlaw mailing list
>>>>>blindlaw at nfbnet.org
>>>>>http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw
>>>>
>>>>_______________________________________________
>>>>blindlaw mailing list
>>>>blindlaw at nfbnet.org
>>>>http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>------------------------------
>>>
>>>Message: 2
>>>Date: Mon, 25 Dec 2006 14:12:10 -0500
>>>From: Stephanie Ortoleva <womankind at earthlink.net>
>>>Subject: Re: [blindlaw] (no subject)
>>>To: NFBnet Blind Law Mailing List <blindlaw at nfbnet.org>
>>>Message-ID: <6.2.1.2.2.20061225141118.03a81a70 at mail.earthlink.net>
>>>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed;
>>> x-avg-checked=avg-ok-478468D4
>>>
>>> Do we need a class on women's rights and feminism here?
>>>Smile.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>At 01:43 PM 12/25/2006, you wrote:
>>>
>>>>Ya know, I'm starting to worry about a few folks here.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>----- Original Message -----
>>>>From: "Stephanie Ortoleva" <womankind at earthlink.net>
>>>>To: "NFBnet Blind Law Mailing List" <blindlaw at nfbnet.org>
>>>>Sent: Friday, December 22, 2006 10:04 AM
>>>>Subject: Re: [blindlaw] (no subject)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Or a male one!
>>>>>
>>>>>At 08:58 PM 12/21/2006, you wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>The female assistant could whisper in your ear!!
>>>>>>Steve
>>>>>>----- Original Message -----
>>>>>>From: "Russell J. Thomas" <rjtlawfirm at yahoo.com>
>>>>>>To: "'NFBnet Blind Law Mailing List'" <blindlaw at nfbnet.org>
>>>>>>Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2006 10:57 AM
>>>>>>Subject: Re: [blindlaw] (no subject)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Some years ago, I read an article about an experimental
>>>>>>>machine that
>>>>would
>>>>>>>speak to you when you were playing black jack or other games on a
>>>>machine.
>>>>>>>However, I have heard nothing about that lately.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>As far as table games are concerned, it might be difficult to
>>>>>>>provide
>>>>an
>>>>>>>assistant. For one thing, it would be difficult to have the
>>>>>>>assistant
>>>>tel
>>>>>>>you what you had in your hand without disclosing your hand to
>>>>>>>other
>>>>>>>players.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>However, it is quite achievable to provide an assistant to
>>>>>>>play on a
>>>>>>>machine. I am not aware that this service is offered,
>>>>>>>although since
>>>>when
>>>>>>>I
>>>>>>>go to Las Vegas I am always with my wife or friends, I have never
>>>>asked.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Mens rooms are a favorite subject with me. I think so much
>>>>>>>emphasis
>>>>has
>>>>>>>been placed on wheelchair accessibility that the blind have been
>>>>ignored.
>>>>>>>I find restrooms, especially large ones, very challenging. I was
>>>>recently
>>>>>>>at the Marriottt at Los Angeles Airport and couldn't figure
>>>>>>>out where
>>>>the
>>>>>>>sinks were to wash my hands.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>In many of the big casinos in Las Vegas, there are security
>>>>>>>personell
>>>>in
>>>>>>>the restrooms. These people have offered to help me many times.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>So long as the bathroom is accessible, or barrier free, I know
>>>>>>>of no
>>>>law
>>>>>>>or
>>>>>>>regulation that currently requires anything more.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Russ Thomas,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Thomas & Associates
>>>>>>>2532 Dupont Drive,
>>>>>>>Irvine Ca 92612
>>>>>>>T: 949.752.0101
>>>>>>>F: 949.257.4756
>>>>>>>M: 949.466.7238
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>>>>>From: blindlaw-bounces at nfbnet.org [mailto:blindlaw- bounces at nfbnet.org]
>>>>On
>>>>>>>Behalf Of Dennis DiBona
>>>>>>>Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2006 8:59 PM
>>>>>>>To: blindlaw at nfbnet.org
>>>>>>>Subject: [blindlaw] (no subject)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>I am researching the issue of equal access for the low vision/ blind
>>>>>>>person wishing to play poker in a casino yet due to the
>>>>>>>disability
>>>>>>>needing a reader in order to level the playing field so he/ she can
>>>>>>>play along with regular players. What does the law provide?
>>>>>>>Also , restrooms in all casinos are very different and many
>>>>>>>are very
>>>>>>>user unfriendly. Are there any regs by law that casino
>>>>>>>operators must
>>>>>>>have in the restrooms to assist the blind to get in and out
>>>>>>>with some
>>>>>>>ease?
>>>>>>>If not, why not? Even a rail to guide the blind along the
>>>>>>>walls to
>>>>>>>and from the commodes and sinks would at least make it somewhat
>>>>>>>easier yet allow for a bit of dignity? What are the heavy
>>>>>>>duty laws
>>>>>>>on this issue?
>>>>>>>Thanks.Dennis
>>>>>>>_______________________________________________
>>>>>>>blindlaw mailing list
>>>>>>>blindlaw at nfbnet.org
>>>>>>>http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>_______________________________________________
>>>>>>>blindlaw mailing list
>>>>>>>blindlaw at nfbnet.org
>>>>>>>http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>--
>>>>>>>No virus found in this incoming message.
>>>>>>>Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>>>>>>>Version: 7.1.409 / Virus Database: 268.15.26/597 - Release Date:
>>>>>>>12/21/2006
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>--
>>>>>>No virus found in this outgoing message.
>>>>>>Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>>>>>>Version: 7.1.409 / Virus Database: 268.15.26/597 - Release Date:
>>>>12/21/2006
>>>>>>_______________________________________________
>>>>>>blindlaw mailing list
>>>>>>blindlaw at nfbnet.org
>>>>>>http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw
>>>>>
>>>>>_______________________________________________
>>>>>blindlaw mailing list
>>>>>blindlaw at nfbnet.org
>>>>>http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>_______________________________________________
>>>>blindlaw mailing list
>>>>blindlaw at nfbnet.org
>>>>http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>------------------------------
>>>
>>>Message: 3
>>>Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2006 05:38:52 -0800
>>>From: "Ross Doerr" <rumpole at gwi.net>
>>>Subject: Re: [blindlaw] (no subject)
>>>To: "NFBnet Blind Law Mailing List" <blindlaw at nfbnet.org>
>>>Message-ID: <000301c728f3$2e717560$8100a8c0 at Rosslaptop>
>>>Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
>>> reply-type=original
>>>
>>>No Ma'am. We don't.
>>>I'll just go back to my corner and hide now.
>>>
>>>
>>>----- Original Message -----
>>>From: "Stephanie Ortoleva" <womankind at earthlink.net>
>>>To: "NFBnet Blind Law Mailing List" <blindlaw at nfbnet.org>
>>>Sent: Monday, December 25, 2006 11:12 AM
>>>Subject: Re: [blindlaw] (no subject)
>>>
>>>
>>>> Do we need a class on women's rights and feminism here?
>>>>Smile.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>At 01:43 PM 12/25/2006, you wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Ya know, I'm starting to worry about a few folks here.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>----- Original Message -----
>>>>>From: "Stephanie Ortoleva" <womankind at earthlink.net>
>>>>>To: "NFBnet Blind Law Mailing List" <blindlaw at nfbnet.org>
>>>>>Sent: Friday, December 22, 2006 10:04 AM
>>>>>Subject: Re: [blindlaw] (no subject)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>Or a male one!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>At 08:58 PM 12/21/2006, you wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>The female assistant could whisper in your ear!!
>>>>>>>Steve
>>>>>>>----- Original Message -----
>>>>>>>From: "Russell J. Thomas" <rjtlawfirm at yahoo.com>
>>>>>>>To: "'NFBnet Blind Law Mailing List'" <blindlaw at nfbnet.org>
>>>>>>>Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2006 10:57 AM
>>>>>>>Subject: Re: [blindlaw] (no subject)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Some years ago, I read an article about an experimental machine
>>>>>>>>that
>>>>>would
>>>>>>>>speak to you when you were playing black jack or other games
>>>>>>>>on a
>>>>>machine.
>>>>>>>>However, I have heard nothing about that lately.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>As far as table games are concerned, it might be difficult to
>>>>>>>>provide
>>>>>an
>>>>>>>>assistant. For one thing, it would be difficult to have the
>>>>>>>>assistant
>>>>>tel
>>>>>>>>you what you had in your hand without disclosing your hand to
>>>>>>>>other
>>>>>>>>players.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>However, it is quite achievable to provide an assistant to
>>>>>>>>play on
>>>>>>>>a
>>>>>>>>machine. I am not aware that this service is offered, although
>>>>>>>>since
>>>>>when
>>>>>>>>I
>>>>>>>>go to Las Vegas I am always with my wife or friends, I have
>>>>>>>>never
>>>>>asked.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Mens rooms are a favorite subject with me. I think so much
>>>>>>>>emphasis
>>>>>has
>>>>>>>>been placed on wheelchair accessibility that the blind have been
>>>>>ignored.
>>>>>>>>I find restrooms, especially large ones, very challenging. I
>>>>>>>>was
>>>>>recently
>>>>>>>>at the Marriottt at Los Angeles Airport and couldn't figure out
>>>>>>>>where
>>>>>the
>>>>>>>>sinks were to wash my hands.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>In many of the big casinos in Las Vegas, there are security
>>>>>>>>personell
>>>>>in
>>>>>>>>the restrooms. These people have offered to help me many times.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>So long as the bathroom is accessible, or barrier free, I
>>>>>>>>know of
>>>>>>>>no
>>>>>law
>>>>>>>>or
>>>>>>>>regulation that currently requires anything more.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Russ Thomas,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Thomas & Associates
>>>>>>>>2532 Dupont Drive,
>>>>>>>>Irvine Ca 92612
>>>>>>>>T: 949.752.0101
>>>>>>>>F: 949.257.4756
>>>>>>>>M: 949.466.7238
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>>>>>>From: blindlaw-bounces at nfbnet.org
>>>>>>>>[mailto:blindlaw-bounces at nfbnet.org]
>>>>>On
>>>>>>>>Behalf Of Dennis DiBona
>>>>>>>>Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2006 8:59 PM
>>>>>>>>To: blindlaw at nfbnet.org
>>>>>>>>Subject: [blindlaw] (no subject)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>I am researching the issue of equal access for the low
>>>>>>>>vision/blind
>>>>>>>>person wishing to play poker in a casino yet due to the
>>>>>>>>disability
>>>>>>>>needing a reader in order to level the playing field so he/ she can
>>>>>>>>play along with regular players. What does the law provide?
>>>>>>>>Also , restrooms in all casinos are very different and many are
>>>>>>>>very
>>>>>>>>user unfriendly. Are there any regs by law that casino operators
>>>>>>>>must
>>>>>>>>have in the restrooms to assist the blind to get in and out with
>>>>>>>>some
>>>>>>>>ease?
>>>>>>>>If not, why not? Even a rail to guide the blind along the
>>>>>>>>walls to
>>>>>>>>and from the commodes and sinks would at least make it somewhat
>>>>>>>>easier yet allow for a bit of dignity? What are the heavy duty
>>>>>>>>laws
>>>>>>>>on this issue?
>>>>>>>>Thanks.Dennis
>>>>>>>>_______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>blindlaw mailing list
>>>>>>>>blindlaw at nfbnet.org
>>>>>>>>http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>_______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>blindlaw mailing list
>>>>>>>>blindlaw at nfbnet.org
>>>>>>>>http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>--
>>>>>>>>No virus found in this incoming message.
>>>>>>>>Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>>>>>>>>Version: 7.1.409 / Virus Database: 268.15.26/597 - Release Date:
>>>>>>>>12/21/2006
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>--
>>>>>>>No virus found in this outgoing message.
>>>>>>>Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>>>>>>>Version: 7.1.409 / Virus Database: 268.15.26/597 - Release Date:
>>>>>12/21/2006
>>>>>>>_______________________________________________
>>>>>>>blindlaw mailing list
>>>>>>>blindlaw at nfbnet.org
>>>>>>>http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw
>>>>>>
>>>>>>_______________________________________________
>>>>>>blindlaw mailing list
>>>>>>blindlaw at nfbnet.org
>>>>>>http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>_______________________________________________
>>>>>blindlaw mailing list
>>>>>blindlaw at nfbnet.org
>>>>>http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw
>>>>
>>>>_______________________________________________
>>>>blindlaw mailing list
>>>>blindlaw at nfbnet.org
>>>>http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>------------------------------
>>>
>>>Message: 4
>>>Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2006 08:23:19 -0800
>>>From: "Mark BurningHawk" <stone_troll at sbcglobal.net>
>>>Subject: Re: [blindlaw] (no subject)
>>>To: "NFBnet Blind Law Mailing List" <blindlaw at nfbnet.org>
>>>Message-ID: <002201c7290a$288ba280$4001a8c0 at your9e3b38be92>
>>>Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
>>> reply-type=original
>>>
>>>... and might I point out that the whole act of posing the
>>>question of
>>>whether feminist enlighten is called for is rather passive
>>>aggressive, a
>>>typical female controlling strategy? ... *ducks and waits for the
>>>glassware
>>>to fly*
>>>
>>>----- Original Message -----
>>>From: "Ross Doerr" <rumpole at gwi.net>
>>>To: "NFBnet Blind Law Mailing List" <blindlaw at nfbnet.org>
>>>Sent: Tuesday, December 26, 2006 5:38 AM
>>>Subject: Re: [blindlaw] (no subject)
>>>
>>>
>>>>No Ma'am. We don't.
>>>>I'll just go back to my corner and hide now.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>----- Original Message -----
>>>>From: "Stephanie Ortoleva" <womankind at earthlink.net>
>>>>To: "NFBnet Blind Law Mailing List" <blindlaw at nfbnet.org>
>>>>Sent: Monday, December 25, 2006 11:12 AM
>>>>Subject: Re: [blindlaw] (no subject)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Do we need a class on women's rights and feminism here?
>>>>>Smile.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>At 01:43 PM 12/25/2006, you wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>Ya know, I'm starting to worry about a few folks here.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>----- Original Message -----
>>>>>>From: "Stephanie Ortoleva" <womankind at earthlink.net>
>>>>>>To: "NFBnet Blind Law Mailing List" <blindlaw at nfbnet.org>
>>>>>>Sent: Friday, December 22, 2006 10:04 AM
>>>>>>Subject: Re: [blindlaw] (no subject)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Or a male one!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>At 08:58 PM 12/21/2006, you wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>The female assistant could whisper in your ear!!
>>>>>>>>Steve
>>>>>>>>----- Original Message -----
>>>>>>>>From: "Russell J. Thomas" <rjtlawfirm at yahoo.com>
>>>>>>>>To: "'NFBnet Blind Law Mailing List'" <blindlaw at nfbnet.org>
>>>>>>>>Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2006 10:57 AM
>>>>>>>>Subject: Re: [blindlaw] (no subject)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Some years ago, I read an article about an experimental machine
>>>>>>>>>that
>>>>>>would
>>>>>>>>>speak to you when you were playing black jack or other games
>>>>>>>>>on a
>>>>>>machine.
>>>>>>>>>However, I have heard nothing about that lately.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>As far as table games are concerned, it might be difficult to
>>>>>>>>>provide
>>>>>>an
>>>>>>>>>assistant. For one thing, it would be difficult to have the
>>>>>>>>>assistant
>>>>>>tel
>>>>>>>>>you what you had in your hand without disclosing your hand to
>>>>>>>>>other
>>>>>>>>>players.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>However, it is quite achievable to provide an assistant to
>>>>>>>>>play
>>>>>>>>>on
>>>>>>>>>a
>>>>>>>>>machine. I am not aware that this service is offered, although
>>>>>>>>>since
>>>>>>when
>>>>>>>>>I
>>>>>>>>>go to Las Vegas I am always with my wife or friends, I have
>>>>>>>>>never
>>>>>>asked.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Mens rooms are a favorite subject with me. I think so much
>>>>>>>>>emphasis
>>>>>>has
>>>>>>>>>been placed on wheelchair accessibility that the blind have
>>>>>>>>>been
>>>>>>ignored.
>>>>>>>>>I find restrooms, especially large ones, very challenging.
>>>>>>>>>I was
>>>>>>recently
>>>>>>>>>at the Marriottt at Los Angeles Airport and couldn't figure out
>>>>>>>>>where
>>>>>>the
>>>>>>>>>sinks were to wash my hands.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>In many of the big casinos in Las Vegas, there are security
>>>>>>>>>personell
>>>>>>in
>>>>>>>>>the restrooms. These people have offered to help me many
>>>>>>>>>times.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>So long as the bathroom is accessible, or barrier free, I
>>>>>>>>>know of
>>>>>>>>>no
>>>>>>law
>>>>>>>>>or
>>>>>>>>>regulation that currently requires anything more.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Russ Thomas,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Thomas & Associates
>>>>>>>>>2532 Dupont Drive,
>>>>>>>>>Irvine Ca 92612
>>>>>>>>>T: 949.752.0101
>>>>>>>>>F: 949.257.4756
>>>>>>>>>M: 949.466.7238
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>>>>>>>From: blindlaw-bounces at nfbnet.org
>>>>>>>>>[mailto:blindlaw-bounces at nfbnet.org]
>>>>>>On
>>>>>>>>>Behalf Of Dennis DiBona
>>>>>>>>>Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2006 8:59 PM
>>>>>>>>>To: blindlaw at nfbnet.org
>>>>>>>>>Subject: [blindlaw] (no subject)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>I am researching the issue of equal access for the low
>>>>>>>>>vision/blind
>>>>>>>>>person wishing to play poker in a casino yet due to the
>>>>>>>>>disability
>>>>>>>>>needing a reader in order to level the playing field so he/she
>>>>>>>>>can
>>>>>>>>>play along with regular players. What does the law provide?
>>>>>>>>>Also , restrooms in all casinos are very different and many are
>>>>>>>>>very
>>>>>>>>>user unfriendly. Are there any regs by law that casino
>>>>>>>>>operators
>>>>>>>>>must
>>>>>>>>>have in the restrooms to assist the blind to get in and out
>>>>>>>>>with
>>>>>>>>>some
>>>>>>>>>ease?
>>>>>>>>>If not, why not? Even a rail to guide the blind along the
>>>>>>>>>walls to
>>>>>>>>>and from the commodes and sinks would at least make it
>>>>>>>>>somewhat
>>>>>>>>>easier yet allow for a bit of dignity? What are the heavy duty
>>>>>>>>>laws
>>>>>>>>>on this issue?
>>>>>>>>>Thanks.Dennis
>>>>>>>>>_______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>blindlaw mailing list
>>>>>>>>>blindlaw at nfbnet.org
>>>>>>>>>http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>_______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>blindlaw mailing list
>>>>>>>>>blindlaw at nfbnet.org
>>>>>>>>>http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>--
>>>>>>>>>No virus found in this incoming message.
>>>>>>>>>Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>>>>>>>>>Version: 7.1.409 / Virus Database: 268.15.26/597 - Release
>>>>>>>>>Date:
>>>>>>>>>12/21/2006
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>--
>>>>>>>>No virus found in this outgoing message.
>>>>>>>>Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>>>>>>>>Version: 7.1.409 / Virus Database: 268.15.26/597 - Release Date:
>>>>>>12/21/2006
>>>>>>>>_______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>blindlaw mailing list
>>>>>>>>blindlaw at nfbnet.org
>>>>>>>>http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>_______________________________________________
>>>>>>>blindlaw mailing list
>>>>>>>blindlaw at nfbnet.org
>>>>>>>http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>_______________________________________________
>>>>>>blindlaw mailing list
>>>>>>blindlaw at nfbnet.org
>>>>>>http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw
>>>>>
>>>>>_______________________________________________
>>>>>blindlaw mailing list
>>>>>blindlaw at nfbnet.org
>>>>>http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>_______________________________________________
>>>>blindlaw mailing list
>>>>blindlaw at nfbnet.org
>>>>http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>------------------------------
>>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>blindlaw mailing list
>>>blindlaw at nfbnet.org
>>>http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw
>>>
>>>
>>>End of blindlaw Digest, Vol 31, Issue 21
>>>****************************************
>
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>blindlaw mailing list
>blindlaw at nfbnet.org
>http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw
More information about the blindlaw
mailing list