[blindlaw] Who does NFB really support?
Craig Anderson
marcra at visi.com
Thu Dec 14 10:37:51 CST 2006
Some commentators on the performance of Supreme Court Justice Clarence
Thomas have reminded us of the old truth that the most pernicious form of
racism is the Uncle Tom variety practiced by African Americans who
themselves think blacks are inferior. I don't suppose the NFB officials who
are touting themselves as "self-reliant conservatives" on this issue
explicitly take the view that the blind -- being blind after all -- should
be content with whatever crumbs society throws them, lest the public become
angry with their stridency and crush them down even more. But if the
Federation's position is to be taken seriously, it looks at least a little
like the NFB takes that view. The government's sole contention on its appeal
of this ruling appears to be that the currency modifications the decision
will ultimately require will cost too much. The district court rejected
this contention as specious. Two factors accentuating this speciousness are
that the plaintiffs are not suggesting modifications to the design of the $1
bill and are proposing that the changes prescribed by the decision be
implemented as part of the next of the Departnent of the Treasury's periodic
anti-counterfeiting currency modifications. Even if this "excessive cost"
argument were sound, the government wouldn't need the NFB's help to make it.
Why that organization has decided to suck up to the Bush administration in
this matter is beyond me.
Craig
----- Original Message -----
From: "dlb723" <dlb723 at comcast.net>
To: <blindlaw at nfbnet.org>
Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2006 4:12 PM
Subject: [blindlaw] Who does NFB really support?
National Federation of Blind Aligns with Bush Administration Appeal of
Landmark Currency Ruling
by Randy Shaw, Dec. 13, 2006
When a federal judge recently ruled that the United States must follow the
lead of 180 nations and modify its currency to accommodate the blind, the
decision
was applauded by sources ranging from the New York Times to The Daily Show
with John Stewart. But the Bush Administration had an ace up its sleeve---a
self-described advocacy group for blind persons that has repeatedly aligned
itself against key civil rights measures for the blind. The National
Federation
of the Blind (NFB) stood alone among major blind and disability rights
organizations in publicly denouncing the ruling, and urged the Bush
Administration
to appeal. On December 12, the NFB got its wish, and even issued a press
release "applauding" the Treasury Department's appeal of the historic
ruling.
As I wrote on
December 1,
the NFB, a controversial nonprofit with ties to Diebold voting machines, was
trying to provide political cover for the Bush Administration's potential
decision
to appeal a federal court ruling that would make US currency more accessible
to the blind.
I received dozens of responses from blind persons and organizations to my
article, and all supported the court's decision. But the NFB has made it
clear
over its history that it thinks it knows the interests of blind people
better than they do, and so it issued a press release condemning the
landmark court
victory.
Many of these responses detailed questionable practices by the NFB that go
well beyond what was detailed in my article. For example, I learned that the
NFB even opposes guide dogs for the blind!
Now the NFB is applauding the Bush Administration's decision to appeal a
ruling that was lavishly praised across America.
The Bush Administration has had success finding African-Americans who oppose
civil rights enforcement and affirmative action, Latinos who oppose
immigration
reform, environmentalists who support Alaska drilling and labor staff who
oppose unions.
The NFB fits perfectly in this collection, as it works hard to deny civil
rights to those it claims to represent.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> blindlaw mailing list
> blindlaw at nfbnet.org
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw
>
More information about the blindlaw
mailing list